- Thread starter
- #81
Israel AF is superior to any European nation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Israel had state-of-the-art aircraft supplied by the US. The opposition had the USSR's outdated cast off Migs. Same thing with Sadam - a huge military but too outdated to even launch a sustained defense.
Scud missiles, they would fire them at Tel Aviv and they would land near Haifa.
Not proven in warfare. On the other hand supercarriers ability to withstand and survive the equivalent of impacts by more than a half dozen missiles is a proven fact.How are you gauging best? I mean the USA has the most useless aircraft carriers that count for nothing in a real warUSA then Russia then China
Then a huge huge drop off
British have a good navy and special forces
Israel has bad azzz Air Force and special forces
French have good balance
That is what I said the Isreali's/US had superior technology that is why they won.Oz and the Orchestra
..like I said, you don't know much about the military/wars/etc ......
1. you didn't understand a single thing in my post
2. wars are MORE than just weapons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahhahahaahah...jesus christ--in fact, logistics/etc determines battles
3. here's a BIG one = Iraq's military not only had the knowlege of the terrain/weather--but the had war experience --and experience in that terrain and weather--big advantage
4. Scuds = HAHHAHAHAHAAHAH ..
--a. irrelevant
--b..Scuds used up a lot of Allied power including SAS and aircraft
5. etc
..if Israel and the US were not better, they would not have won!!! DUH --especially considering my points in the previous points
Training and motivation counted for jack shit in Saddam's case. His forces were routed within weeks by the massive superiority in the technology of the US/British forces.Oz and the Orchestra
training--motivation--not the weapons
That is what I said the Isreali's/US had superior technology that is why they won.Oz and the Orchestra
..like I said, you don't know much about the military/wars/etc ......
1. you didn't understand a single thing in my post
2. wars are MORE than just weapons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahhahahaahah...jesus christ--in fact, logistics/etc determines battles
3. here's a BIG one = Iraq's military not only had the knowlege of the terrain/weather--but the had war experience --and experience in that terrain and weather--big advantage
4. Scuds = HAHHAHAHAHAAHAH ..
--a. irrelevant
--b..Scuds used up a lot of Allied power including SAS and aircraft
5. etc
..if Israel and the US were not better, they would not have won!!! DUH --especially considering my points in the previous points
When British Aerospace sells aircraft to Suadi Arabia training the pilots and all the logistics involved in making the system work is also part of the package as it was with Israel and the US.
Saddam had spent the last decade locked in an endless war with Iran, a country that was much largest both militarily and in population. That was actually technologically superior at the time. As at that stage, they still had a lot of the best equipment that the US would sell to other nations.Training and motivation counted for jack shit in Saddam's case. His forces were routed within weeks by the massive superiority in the technology of the US/British forces.Oz and the Orchestra
training--motivation--not the weapons
Quasar44
I don't see how anyone can assess what China has. Being patriotic doesnt affect their capabilities.
Don't assume anything about them.