Who does Trump think he is?

[meaner gene]

Free passage doesn't mean want you want it to mean.

Panama is now giving our naval ships FREE passage through the canal. I'd call that a win. They knew if they kept ripping us off they lose control of the canal.

 

[Oddball]

It doesn't matter the reason. If it's an american, Just get the warrant. They have judges that can issue warrants, 24/7/365. It's what the constitution says. And Trump went against that. He could've vetoed the reauthorization and told them to remove 702.

Funny how Trump blasted Obama for spying on his campaign. As you mentioned before. But when it time for him to protect any other American citizens, he didn't care.
"Good for the. Not for me."

So you're equating fraudulently attaining a star chamber court warrant to spy on a political rival, with legitimate above-board investigations of criminal wrongdoing?

Have you lost your fucking mind?

 

[Billiejeens]

So you're equating fraudulently attaining a star chamber court warrant to spy on a political rival, with legitimate above-board investigations of criminal wrongdoing?

Have you lost your fucking mind?

Yes

 

[YoursTruly]

So you're equating fraudulently attaining a star chamber court warrant to spy on a political rival, with legitimate above-board investigations of criminal wrongdoing?

Have you lost your fucking mind?

I'm saying spying on Americans without a warrant, is unconstitutional. You can try to spin this into some BS if you want to. But I'm only supporting the constitution.
And you RINO's are bashing me for doing so.

 

[YoursTruly]

He hasn't taken over one country. But, he has got concessions from several of them, if not all.

If it's something those countries want to do, on their own (without force or cohesion), I'm all for it.

 

[Oddball]

I'm saying spying on Americans without a warrant, is unconstitutional. You can try to spin this into some BS if you want to. But I'm only supporting the constitution.
And you RINO's are bashing me for doing so.

Not a RINO...I'm a recovering libertarian.

For all that he's done over the last few weeks, I would have thought that glibertarians like you would be cheering to the heavens for all the havoc Trump is wreaking to the entrenched bureaucracy...But instead all you can do is bitchbitchbitchbitch....One of the numerous reasons I ditched your train wreck of a party after '04.

Yes, the Orange God Emperor is a poorly closeted 1980's democrat, but he has effected more real change in Foggy Bottom over the last few weeks, than all your bitching and lofty position papers from CATO ever did.

 

[YoursTruly]

Not a RINO...I'm a recovering libertarian.

For all that he's done over the last few weeks, I would have thought that glibertarians like you would be cheering to the heavens for all the havoc Trump is wreaking to the entrenched bureaucracy...But instead all you can do is bitchbitchbitchbitch....One of the numerous reasons I ditched your train wreck of a party after '04.

Yes, the Orange God Emperor is a poorly closeted 1980's democrat, but he has effected more real change in Foggy Bottom over the last few weeks, than all your bitching and lofty position papers from CATO ever did.

Libertarians are just washed up & pissed off ex Bernie supporting liberals.

The dust is going to settle on Trump within the next 6 months. His big show starter is going to come to an end. And the big spending, life long democrat is going to show his true colors.
All these EO's he's doing now, mostly are just photo op BS, to get his supporters excited. He and most presidents pulls this fake BS when they first enter the white house.

 

[Independent thinker]

If it's something those countries want to do, on their own (without force or cohesion), I'm all for it.

Depends on what you mean by force or coercion. Telling countries they had better pony up to help us is not either. One example is NATO, another Climate Change. If we're going to foot most of the bills for it all then screw them. Same with the border. If they are going to help people rush to our border to cross illegally, then they'd better expect some push back on that. And, we built and paid for the Panama Canal and then just gave it to them. If they're going to just let our enemies go through then they should get some push back. We also defend Greenland and have bases there. They should pay us for that in the form of rare Earth metals, just as Ukraine should. The whole world expects us to be their gravy train for everything, to the tune of 35 trillion dollars.

 

[YoursTruly]

Depends on what you mean by force or coercion. Telling countries they had better pony up to help us is not either. One example is NATO, another Climate Change. If we're going to foot most of the bills for it all then screw them. Same with the border. If they are going to help people rush to our border to cross illegally, then they'd better expect some push back on that. And, we built and paid for the Panama Canal and then just gave it to them. If they're going to just let our enemies go through then they should get some push back. We also defend Greenland and have bases there. They should pay us for that in the form of rare Earth metals, just as Ukraine should. The whole world expects us to be their gravy train for everything, to the tune of 35 trillion dollars.

There's no need to tell NATO or a country to spend more. We should simply spend less. Them spending more, and we keep spending the same isn't saving us any money.
As far as the border goes, no government should have the authority to force their people to stay in their own country.
And I dare say that if all these migrants were just passing through to Canada, we'd surely help them complete their journey. It would be Canada's problem, not ours.
Just like Abbott and DeSantis sending theirs to NY & Chicago.

 

[Independent thinker]

There's no need to tell NATO or a country to spend more. We should simply spend less. Them spending more, and we keep spending the same isn't saving us any money.
As far as the border goes, no government should have the authority to force their people to stay in their own country.
And I dare say that if all these migrants were just passing through to Canada, we'd surely help them complete their journey. It would be Canada's problem, not ours.
Just like Abbott and DeSantis sending theirs to NY & Chicago.

But the point with NATO is, if the other countries paid their fair share, we wouldn't be spending what we are spending.

 

[YoursTruly]

But the point with NATO is, if the other countries paid their fair share, we wouldn't be spending what we are spending.

FFS, we don't even need to be part of NATO. And if we just greatly reduced what we send to NATO, there's not a darn thing they could do about it.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Crazy would be putting loyalty in a politicians. Trump or Biden. Political loyalty is insane.

Yet you only talk like this with Trump. Like it or not, you live in a political world. Your choice is to participate or not participate. You choose not to participate and criticize the result

 

[BackAgain]

Or him saying the N word.

Claim made. No proof.

Or him saying not to invite wounded soldiers to perform because "no one wants to see that".

Claim made. No proof.

I guess those aren't on tape.

They wouldn’t be if they weren’t said.

He's not dumb like Nixon.

He isn’t dumb at all.

And even if we showed you those tapes, would you take back your vote?

If you have such tapes, play them. Otherwise, it’s simply unsupported claims and I doubt they are true.

 

[Billiejeens]

I'm saying spying on Americans without a warrant, is unconstitutional. You can try to spin this into some BS if you want to. But I'm only supporting the constitution.
And you RINO's are bashing me for doing so.

You get bashed because you don't seem to know that you have to build a consensus.
You have to build alliances.
It doesn't matter how correct you may be - unless you want a Dictatorship you need to consistently win elections.

 

[sealybobo]

Claim made. No proof.


Claim made. No proof.


They wouldn’t be if they weren’t said.

He isn’t dumb at all.

If you have such tapes, play them. Otherwise, it’s simply unsupported claims and I doubt they are true.

Have you ever said the N word?

 

[BackAgain]

Have you ever said the N word?

I have quoted people who have used that word. But I have never referred to black people by using that word.

Why do you ask? (I mean, I have a hunch as to what you were trying to say. But it looks to be merely uninformed speculation on your part.)

 

[YoursTruly]

You get bashed because you don't seem to know that you have to build a consensus.
You have to build alliances.
It doesn't matter how correct you may be - unless you want a Dictatorship you need to consistently win elections.

They need a consensus to abide by the constitution and get a warrant to spy on us?

You Trump supporting RINO's need to have your heads checked.

 

[Billiejeens]

They need a consensus to abide by the constitution and get a warrant to spy on us?

You Trump supporting RINO's need to have your heads checked.

A politics group is not the group for you.

 

[gipper]

Or, and I’ll continue the largely baseless speculation, here, perhaps the oft-misunderstood concept of “America First” has nothing to do with any “empire.”

Also, to place the interests of our republic over that of the interests of other nations (which is the foundation of “America First”) is perfectly consistent with contemplating the notions of seeking to acquire Greenland, Canada etc.

Oh DumbAgain stop being so dumb. You claim you oppose empire while supporting imperialism and war. You cons are so confused.

 

[gipper]

I'm saying spying on Americans without a warrant, is unconstitutional. You can try to spin this into some BS if you want to. But I'm only supporting the constitution.
And you RINO's are bashing me for doing so.

They claim to support the Constitution while simultaneously ignoring it when it’s convenient.

Can’t fix stupid.