Joe Kent again lays down the cards, dares the Administration to refute him, which it can't....

[EMH]

US intel community agreed before war 'Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon': ex-counterterrorism chief

Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent said the U.S. intelligence community agreed prior to the war that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon.

www.foxnews.com

""One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.," Kent wrote in a post on Thursday."



now somehow that, via...

regime change
punishment for executing protestors
they are the "bully" of the Middle East (except nobody can name a war they started)
they "sponsor terror" despite the vast majority of the "terror" being hate hoaxed by Israel, and the fact that Iran, not America, not Israel, was actually trying to off Taliban.


to.... drumroll... what we've heard over and over for 40 years now.


"Iran can't be allowed to have a nuke". .... .... .... never mind our 18 intel agencies all told Donald Trump that Iran was not in the process of trying to make a nuke...


Iran has never had a radiation spike in large part because Russians run their nuke power generation...


This is absolutely pathetic. There was NO US NATIONAL INTEREST in attacking Iran, ZERO.

 

[excalibur]

However, in April 2015, President Obama acknowledged in an NPR interview that the deal included "sunset clauses" where, in the final years of the agreement (around 13-15 years later), Iran’s breakout time to a nuclear weapon would shrink to "near zero". ​

 

[Concerned American]

US intel community agreed before war 'Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon': ex-counterterrorism chief

Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent said the U.S. intelligence community agreed prior to the war that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon.

www.foxnews.com

""One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.," Kent wrote in a post on Thursday."



now somehow that, via...

regime change
punishment for executing protestors
they are the "bully" of the Middle East (except nobody can name a war they started)
they "sponsor terror" despite the vast majority of the "terror" being hate hoaxed by Israel, and the fact that Iran, not America, not Israel, was actually trying to off Taliban.


to.... drumroll... what we've heard over and over for 40 years now.


"Iran can't be allowed to have a nuke". .... .... .... never mind our 18 intel agencies all told Donald Trump that Iran was not in the process of trying to make a nuke...


Iran has never had a radiation spike in large part because Russians run their nuke power generation...


This is absolutely pathetic. There was NO US NATIONAL INTEREST in attacking Iran, ZERO.

Hmm, seems your EXPERTS need to educate themselves.

Iran has demonstrated missile capabilities that can reach up to 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers), which is significantly beyond their previously claimed limit of 1,240 miles (2,000 kilometers). This was evidenced by their attempt to strike the Diego Garcia military base, located 2,500 miles away, although the attack was unsuccessful.
The Economic Times The Times of Israel

 

[EMH]

Iran has demonstrated missile capabilities that can reach up to 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers), which is significantly beyond their previously claimed limit of 1,240 miles (2,000 kilometers).

Iran gets help from China and Russia. Duh...

and that's not the question. The question was WERE THEY BUILDING A NUKE BOMB? The answer Trump got from 18 out of 18 US intel agencies was NO.



Trump on Tucker's show before the election said

"many people tell me 107 never happened."


Now it is a reason to attack Iran.



And transman Brigitt Macron is now "the respected First Lady of France."

Well, then he should come over here and DISROBE and leave no doubt....

Indeed, before the French lay a hand on Candace Owens, the American People should demand just that. In France the chosen gave those who noticed the "First Lady" is a man "the Alex Jones treatment," where just a few fudged documents were sufficient to NOT GET A LOOK AT THE ACTUAL TRUTH, and then convict solely on the basis of chosen fudged documents and chosen fascist gun grabbing treasonous liars.




and notice the response no longer included Mossad's lie about Iran building a nuke bomb....

 

[EMH]

However, in April 2015, President Obama acknowledged in an NPR interview that the deal included "sunset clauses" where, in the final years of the agreement (around 13-15 years later), Iran’s breakout time to a nuclear weapon would shrink to "near zero". ​

In 2002 VP Dick Cheney told us that if we don't invade Iraq, we will see a nuke cloud over DC....


because Dick Cheney and Tenet were the ones doctoring the intel which turned out to be complete and total 100% pure

TREASONOUS ZIONIST FASCIST BULLSHIT

 

[markef]

US intel community agreed before war 'Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon': ex-counterterrorism chief

Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent said the U.S. intelligence community agreed prior to the war that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon.

www.foxnews.com

""One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.," Kent wrote in a post on Thursday."



now somehow that, via...

regime change
punishment for executing protestors
they are the "bully" of the Middle East (except nobody can name a war they started)
they "sponsor terror" despite the vast majority of the "terror" being hate hoaxed by Israel, and the fact that Iran, not America, not Israel, was actually trying to off Taliban.


to.... drumroll... what we've heard over and over for 40 years now.


"Iran can't be allowed to have a nuke". .... .... .... never mind our 18 intel agencies all told Donald Trump that Iran was not in the process of trying to make a nuke...


Iran has never had a radiation spike in large part because Russians run their nuke power generation...


This is absolutely pathetic. There was NO US NATIONAL INTEREST in attacking Iran, ZERO.

If only the dummass Muslim Iranian dictators funding terrorism and mass murder worldwide for decades had only stopped threatening "Death to America" where Trump could hear them.

 

[EMH]

If only the dummass Muslim Iranian dictators funding terrorism and mass murder worldwide for decades had only stopped threatening "Death to America" where Trump could hear them.

If we took a poll of America on whether or not to deport you to Israel right now with just that post of sub crap as the justification, what do you think the poll would show??

 

[markef]

If we took a poll of America on whether or not to deport you to Israel right now with just that post of sub crap as the justification, what do you think the poll would show??

The overwhelming majority of God-rejecting leftists would likely prefer murdering me over deporting me.

 

[BackAgain]

US intel community agreed before war 'Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon': ex-counterterrorism chief

Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent said the U.S. intelligence community agreed prior to the war that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon.

www.foxnews.com

""One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.," Kent wrote in a post on Thursday."



now somehow that, via...

regime change
punishment for executing protestors
they are the "bully" of the Middle East (except nobody can name a war they started)
they "sponsor terror" despite the vast majority of the "terror" being hate hoaxed by Israel, and the fact that Iran, not America, not Israel, was actually trying to off Taliban.


to.... drumroll... what we've heard over and over for 40 years now.


"Iran can't be allowed to have a nuke". .... .... .... never mind our 18 intel agencies all told Donald Trump that Iran was not in the process of trying to make a nuke...


Iran has never had a radiation spike in large part because Russians run their nuke power generation...


This is absolutely pathetic. There was NO US NATIONAL INTEREST in attacking Iran, ZERO.

There is no genuine question about it. It is a simple and obvious fact that Iran was absolutely seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

There is (quite literally) no other reason to enrich uranium to 60% other than to lay the groundwork to get it to 90% enrichment. And the sole purpose for the latter is to make nuclear weapons.

Plus, of course, Iran acknowledged their intention.

And, how long does it take to enrich the uranium to 90% once you’ve accomplished enrichment to 60%? A week 10 days.

Kent is an agent of disinformation. And some of you folks (like EMH) lap that disinformation right the hell up.

 

[BackAgain]

If we took a poll of America on whether or not to deport you to Israel right now with just that post of sub crap as the justification, what do you think the poll would show??

Probably not what you seem to imagine.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

US intel community agreed before war 'Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon': ex-counterterrorism chief

Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent said the U.S. intelligence community agreed prior to the war that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon.

www.foxnews.com

""One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.," Kent wrote in a post on Thursday."



now somehow that, via...

regime change
punishment for executing protestors
they are the "bully" of the Middle East (except nobody can name a war they started)
they "sponsor terror" despite the vast majority of the "terror" being hate hoaxed by Israel, and the fact that Iran, not America, not Israel, was actually trying to off Taliban.


to.... drumroll... what we've heard over and over for 40 years now.


"Iran can't be allowed to have a nuke". .... .... .... never mind our 18 intel agencies all told Donald Trump that Iran was not in the process of trying to make a nuke...


Iran has never had a radiation spike in large part because Russians run their nuke power generation...


This is absolutely pathetic. There was NO US NATIONAL INTEREST in attacking Iran, ZERO.

Iran has increasingly been more and more ripe for taking out. They financially support and train global terrorism. They mass murdered at least 30,000 of their own citizens just in 2025. They have built the worlds largest and most advanced drone army. Their long range missile capability has been growing.

AND BESIDES ALL OF THIS - WHAT THIS STUPIDITY COMPLETELY IGNORES - Iran has been manufacturing near weapons grade uranium for over a decade. And storing it. And began ramping it up in the past few years. Inarguable. Everyone knows it. The - ONLY - reason to produce and store weapon-enriched uranium is to make a bomb.
Idiots like this need to simply STFU with "no proof" bullshit. Making that uranium and storing it - IS PREPARING FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

 

[EMH]

The overwhelming majority of God-rejecting leftists would likely prefer murdering me over deporting me.

Two topics for you...

Thread 'The relentless idiocy of equating "support for Israel" with "conservative"'

Mar 12, 2026

It is perfectly clear that many here who ID as "conservative" have no clue what the word means

Google Search

GoogAI

"A conservative non-interventionist foreign policy emphasizes avoiding foreign entanglements, prioritizing national sovereignty, and maintaining a strong defense for self-defense rather than global nation-building. Rooted in historical American...

• EMH
• Replies: 217
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

Thread 'Introducing the "Ilhan Omar Act"'

Aug 10, 2024

We need an "Ilhan Omar Act" right now.

Ms. Omar clearly stated she cares more about Somalia than America.

Ilhan Omar Brags About Advancing a Somalia First Agenda in Congress

Every day, up to 5,000 prospective “asylum-seekers” cross America’s porous southern border, a growing crisis that has existed since Joe Biden became president and acted on his campaign call for foreign nationals to “surge to the border.” A question Americans should be asking is: How many of them...

www.heritage.org

This is what the Ilhan Omar Act would state...


If you are convicted of articulating that you care more about another country than the United States, you are DEPORTED TO THAT COUNTRY.



This way, Ms. Omar would be punted back to Somalia....

and ALL SUBS would be deported to ISRAEL.


And THAT would truly MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!!

• EMH
• Replies: 88
• Forum: Politics

• 

 

[EMH]

There is (quite literally) no other reason to enrich uranium to 60%

We remember all the lies last time used to sell out our troops, national interest, and solvency to the cause of Zionist Fascism in Iraq.


Yellowcake from Niger = 100% BS fudged document and Saddam had 20 tons of yellowcake he could not enrich
Saddam giving chem and bio to "AQ" = 100% fabrication, even if you believe AQ actually existed. If it did exist as a mountain range terror group, both of those weapons are not good weapons for them. Sarin requires air superiority to even try, expensive bulky storage facility, expensive hazard suits etc. Bio has a lot of the same issues, and as we saw with Covid, it largely flops. The "actual claim" of that came from one innocent Afghan grabbed in 2001, sent to Gitmo, then the CIA branch office in Libya where he was waterboarded until he said it. He later told the FBI he was not AQ and had never heard of AQ.


You were one of the Zionist Fascists pushing hard for a US war with Iraq with those lies....

 

[EMH]

Probably not what you seem to imagine.

LOL!!!

Let's have a look at some polls, why not...

New poll shows growing number of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of Iran war

The latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll shows that six in 10 Americans disapprove of how President Trump is handling Iran. Lisa Desjardins joins Amna Nawaz to offer insights on the poll with a closer look at how Americans are seeing the war in Iran and rising gas prices.

www.pbs.org

Negative views of Israel, Netanyahu continue to rise among Americans – especially young people

Views of Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu have grown more negative among U.S. adults, with majorities under 50 in both parties rating them poorly.

www.pewresearch.org

• 60% of U.S. adults have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 53% last year.
• 59% have little or no confidence in Netanyahu to do the right thing regarding world affairs – up from 52% last year.
• In both political parties, majorities of adults under the age of 50 now rate Israel and Netanyahu negatively

Meaning other than BrokeLoser's demographic, everyone else here is not fooled anymore...

 

[BackAgain]

We remember all the lies last time used to sell out our troops, national interest, and solvency to the cause of Zionist Fascism in Iraq.

Nonsense at every point in that idiotic reply. Especially dishonest of you is your usual spew of baseless accusations about the “Zionist” cause. You’re still just spouting absolutely absurd talking points.

Yellowcake from Niger = 100% BS fudged document and Saddam had 20 tons of yellowcake he could not enrich
Saddam giving chem and bio to "AQ" = 100% fabrication, even if you believe AQ actually existed. If it did exist as a mountain range terror group, both of those weapons are not good weapons for them. Sarin requires air superiority to even try, expensive bulky storage facility, expensive hazard suits etc. Bio has a lot of the same issues, and as we saw with Covid, it largely flops. The "actual claim" of that came from one innocent Afghan grabbed in 2001, sent to Gitmo, then the CIA branch office in Libya where he was waterboarded until he said it. He later told the FBI he was not AQ and had never heard of AQ.

This conversation has absolutely no nexus with Iraq. So your laborious rant is of no cake.

You were one of the Zionist Fascists pushing hard for a US war with Iraq with those lies....

I have never been a fascist. Your claims are dishonest.

LOL!!!

Let's have a look at some polls, why not...

New poll shows growing number of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of Iran war

The latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll shows that six in 10 Americans disapprove of how President Trump is handling Iran. Lisa Desjardins joins Amna Nawaz to offer insights on the poll with a closer look at how Americans are seeing the war in Iran and rising gas prices.

www.pbs.org

Negative views of Israel, Netanyahu continue to rise among Americans – especially young people

Views of Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu have grown more negative among U.S. adults, with majorities under 50 in both parties rating them poorly.

www.pewresearch.org

• 60% of U.S. adults have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 53% last year.
• 59% have little or no confidence in Netanyahu to do the right thing regarding world affairs – up from 52% last year.
• In both political parties, majorities of adults under the age of 50 now rate Israel and Netanyahu negatively

Meaning other than BrokeLoser's demographic, everyone else here is not fooled anymore...

your ability to engage in any actual discussion is really and fully undercut by your lack of intellect.

Polls don’t tell us anything factual regarding anything being discussed.

 

[Cassandro]

The question was WERE THEY BUILDING A NUKE BOMB?

No, the question is whether they were building the COMPONENTS of a nuclear bomb. The answer is YES.

 

[toomuchtime_]

No, the question is whether they were building the COMPONENTS of a nuclear bomb. The answer is YES.

No, the question is, might they be trying to produce fissile material for a bomb, and if they wee or planned to, they must give up the capability to do so, namely all enrichment equipment.

 

[EMH]

Polls don’t tell us anything factual regarding anything being discussed

LOL!!!

Everything Zionist Fascist is around 30% in the polls, meaning just you Zionist Fascist Traitors and the drone army of self proclaimed sub humans. Everyone else has a clue. Trump is discovering that the hard way.

 

[EMH]

No, the question is whether they were building the COMPONENTS of a nuclear bomb. The answer is YES.

You treasonous Zionist Fascist LIARS never stop.

You "know better" than our 18 intel agencies.... because you have a beak and a birdbrain (and ZERO patriotism to America) and you parrot Jew Fraud of a Christian Preacher and the Fox Faux News...

 

[BackAgain]

LOL!!!

Everything Zionist Fascist is around 30% in the polls, meaning just you Zionist Fascist Traitors and the drone army of self proclaimed sub humans. Everyone else has a clue. Trump is discovering that the hard way.

Your perpetual alarm about all things related to Jews and Israel is ******* boring.

It is perhaps worthy of a few derisive laughs aimed at you and what passes for your “thought [sic] process, yet it is still basically just a dull one note symphony of bullshit.