Who did more lasting damage to Europe?

Who did more lasting damage to Europe?

  • Hitler & Mussolini

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Merkel & May

    Votes: 13 48.1%
  • Other

    Votes: 6 22.2%

  • Total voters
    27
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.
 
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Hitler & Mussolini did more damage to Europe than Merkel & May.

Why? Because only one of those two pairs is responsible for the deaths and suffering of scores of millions of people.

Oh, and because I haven't been driven insane by psycho, comical, goofy, partisan, mega-super hyperbole. Yet.
.

Europe recovered rapidly from the damage inflicted by Hitler and Mussolini.
 
But Where is Hitler from? Do you listen to Hitler as an Academic? He shouts the slogans, the pestilent Jew, then there's 7 about poltics about the Reactionary Allies and the Communists? Where is Hitler From? Isn't This what Napoleon did? Napoleon is a Crowned Roman Emperor for the Pope to Observe, the salute the depicted , Roman salute, and somehow this is enough to appease this region of the world. Italy, Germany, France rolls over seems like!
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.
FDR made Stalin fight the war in Europe

Actually no, Hitler did that but France and England are responsible for putting Hitler in power. The Europeans themselves are responsible for putting themselves in their, current mess. You'd think that they would know by now that any form of collective government can never work because it never has so it never will. DUH!
 
Dick, aptly named, Neville Chamberlain was just an appeasement weakling, so says everybody, who allowed Hitler's pure Crap to be smiled at for a full decade. Only on maybe the 4th invasion in Poland did any sort of Alliance kick into effect. And Hitler is known as a World War 1 sicko who insulted cowardly surrender, and he probably hated France And England from World War 1.
 
World war 1 created World War 2.

First of all, the Germans sent Lenin to Russia with orders to overthrow the Czar and take the Russians out of the war, which they did. Communism was a German implant, a close cousin to the National Socialists. In fact, it was well know that it was easy to convert a communist into a National Socialist and vice versa.

Then President Wilson and company presided over horrible terms that created the desire by Germany to get even.

After planting the seeds, everyone just sat back and watched the horror unfold.
 
Votto you're a total liar. Half truth just makes you a total liar! Lenin it says was in several exiles for communist activities. Don't Slightly suggest cohesion between German government and Lenin activities, who needed exile in the West, mostly Finland?
 
OK OK I'm reading it tbut this hand-drawn blog is convincing as say, Star Trek Episode 3 to a History Review. You Know that Orthodox Christianity was devoid of education for the peasants? You are aware that the peasants were the last places in Europe to still be whipped and flogged? You are aware the Emperor fired on all thes epersons, that the Russo-Japanese war of 1905 was a humiliation to all the Armed Forces? I think its ridiculous and its fair for Churchill to be Spouting pure pompous, BS, that is his highborn role, like sending Thousands of men to Die before the war in his little Venture into Istanbul, Whoopsies! I'm some highborn commander that gets to just make Cluster%(&*#$ kill thousands of men and come back after some rest, whoopsies.

Wow to be Clear, that's Churchill accusing enemies , of providing the poison within a half-ally , probably During a war. That's probably a negatively evidential quote. It probably required negative proof to past the smell test. It has an Affective quality.

Marxism developed in French Revolution protests and moved to Russia with other circumstances, aren't these well-known facts, and much more obscure s the idea that Any support in what, "Finances"? "Politics"? Came out of Germany? And Hitler was totally afraid and Against the Communists. His Nazi party is definitely the formation of a politics against the COmmunists and other factions.
 
Last edited:
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

You mean who did Stalin think he was invading Poland with Hitler to divvy it up between the two?

I think that's what you meant, right?

The Allies should have declared war on both of them.

Nnnnnnnnnnnnape. I meant what I posted. I'm careful that way. Nice try but deal with it.
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.

Pop quiz ---- Hitler ate his own bullet because who was coming?
 
Votto you're a total liar. Half truth just makes you a total liar! Lenin it says was in several exiles for communist activities. Don't Slightly suggest cohesion between German government and Lenin activities, who needed exile in the West, mostly Finland?
Educate yourself

Germany’s Role in the Rise of Lenin and the Russian Communism
Ive just read that and I shall give you feedback.

Any historical analysis that contains this phrase "it can be no coincidence" should be given a wide swerve.
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.

Pop quiz ---- Hitler ate his own bullet because who was coming?
Pop quiz 2 - T or F after Russia invaded Finland while Hitler invaded Poland, wait....what? Russia invaded who?...wait...you mean Russia invaded someone before WW II started at the same time Hitler also invaded?
But...but.... anyway... Finlands tiny army actually succussfully held Russia back and only lost a small portion of their territory.
 
The damage caused by Nazi Germany was extensive, and physically ruinous. However, the Marshall Plan, and re-construction after WWII largely erased the destruction, and relatively quickly, except for the Communist Block countries who lagged behind. However, even places like East Germany rebounded with unification a few decades later.

The post WWII Socialism, and the unbridled importation of Muslim refugees is creating longer term, systemic problems for Europe which will transcend much more time than the effects of WWII.
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.

Pop quiz ---- Hitler ate his own bullet because who was coming?
Pop quiz 2 - T or F after Russia invaded Finland while Hitler invaded Poland, wait....what? Russia invaded who?...wait...you mean Russia invaded someone before WW II started at the same time Hitler also invaded?
But...but.... anyway... Finlands tiny army actually succussfully held Russia back and only lost a small portion of their territory.
T
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.

Pop quiz ---- Hitler ate his own bullet because who was coming?
Pop quiz 2 - T or F after Russia invaded Finland while Hitler invaded Poland, wait....what? Russia invaded who?...wait...you mean Russia invaded someone before WW II started at the same time Hitler also invaded?
But...but.... anyway... Finlands tiny army actually succussfully held Russia back and only lost a small portion of their territory.

Russia and Finland have a history like that. As is not uncommon between, you know, countries that sit right next to each other.

What's that got to do with FDR?
 
FDR-he let Stalin run wild.

I know right? Who did Stalin think he was, conquering Nazi Germany and shit. :mad:

:rolleyes:
This gets old.
1) It wasn't his choice. While he didn't trust Hitler, his choice was to work with him and split the goods. Hitler would have NEVER got the military might he had without Stalin helping him on multiple levels. It wasn't until Hitler turned on Stalin did he fight against him.
2) Russia's vast-vast brutal weather and landscape did more to defeat Hitler than his armies. Not to mention Hitler's own poor decision making.
3) Without America's supply chain and our entrance, Hitler would have won. That is inarguable. Russia was very good at defending itself in WWII, but not very good at invading outsife of their own lands.

Pop quiz ---- Hitler ate his own bullet because who was coming?
Pop quiz 2 - T or F after Russia invaded Finland while Hitler invaded Poland, wait....what? Russia invaded who?...wait...you mean Russia invaded someone before WW II started at the same time Hitler also invaded?
But...but.... anyway... Finlands tiny army actually succussfully held Russia back and only lost a small portion of their territory.
T

He didn't state a question. Learn to read.
 
Why?

Naked incompetence.

Mekel is enemy of white christian man. she deliberately destroyed his countries, she is the pure evil, a demon

incroyable-un-demon-jaillit-des-yeux-d%E2%80%99angela-merkel-lors-de-linauguration-du-tunnel-suisse.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top