Who Are The Palestinians?

[montelatici]

But it was Israel that attacked in the 1967 War. Israel started the fight. Why do you post nonsense?

"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) "

CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War Central Intelligence Agency

Yes you see, Israel paid 5 surrounding Arab countries to pretend a united Arab attack at five different positions. I'll bet those Zionists never knew that, right Monte?

There was no attack by the Arab countries. Israel attacked. Are you able to read?

Go do some research on the term 'pre emptive strike' liar. Israel had every reason to believe that Egypt was planning an attack on them.

Egypt mobilized forces by the Israeli border. They expelled peacekeeping forces that were placed there following the Suez Crisis. Egypt also closed the Strait of Tiran , which Israel said beforehand would be considered an act of war.
Why should Israel have waited until Egypt was going to attack them ??

"It is often claimed that Israel’s attack on Egypt that began the June 1967 “Six Day War” was a “preemptive” one. Implicit in that description is the notion that Israel was under imminent threat of an attack from Egypt. Yet this historical interpretation of the war is not sustained by the documentary record.

The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack.............the CIA assessed that Nasser’s military presence in the Sinai was defensive,..............Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Despite its total lack of sustainability from the documentary record, and despite such admissions from top Israeli officials, it is virtually obligatory for commentators in contemporary mainstream accounts of the ’67 war to describe Israel’s attack on Egypt as “preemptive”.

Israel s attack on Egypt in June 67 was not preemptive Foreign Policy Journal

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

 

[Phoenall]

No right of return under International law. video dismissed as being propaganda

She is a rights lawyer.

And you are not.

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Sure they have.

Nice duck.

Links to the reports have been given, not my fault you refused to read them.

 

[montelatici]

Who are the Palestinians?

Lamis Deek

No right of return under International law. video dismissed as being propaganda

She is a rights lawyer.

And you are not.

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

 

[Phoenall]

Yes you see, Israel paid 5 surrounding Arab countries to pretend a united Arab attack at five different positions. I'll bet those Zionists never knew that, right Monte?

There was no attack by the Arab countries. Israel attacked. Are you able to read?

Go do some research on the term 'pre emptive strike' liar. Israel had every reason to believe that Egypt was planning an attack on them.

Egypt mobilized forces by the Israeli border. They expelled peacekeeping forces that were placed there following the Suez Crisis. Egypt also closed the Strait of Tiran , which Israel said beforehand would be considered an act of war.
Why should Israel have waited until Egypt was going to attack them ??

"It is often claimed that Israel’s attack on Egypt that began the June 1967 “Six Day War” was a “preemptive” one. Implicit in that description is the notion that Israel was under imminent threat of an attack from Egypt. Yet this historical interpretation of the war is not sustained by the documentary record.

The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack.............the CIA assessed that Nasser’s military presence in the Sinai was defensive,..............Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Despite its total lack of sustainability from the documentary record, and despite such admissions from top Israeli officials, it is virtually obligatory for commentators in contemporary mainstream accounts of the ’67 war to describe Israel’s attack on Egypt as “preemptive”.

Israel s attack on Egypt in June 67 was not preemptive Foreign Policy Journal

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

 

[montelatici]

There was no attack by the Arab countries. Israel attacked. Are you able to read?

Go do some research on the term 'pre emptive strike' liar. Israel had every reason to believe that Egypt was planning an attack on them.

Egypt mobilized forces by the Israeli border. They expelled peacekeeping forces that were placed there following the Suez Crisis. Egypt also closed the Strait of Tiran , which Israel said beforehand would be considered an act of war.
Why should Israel have waited until Egypt was going to attack them ??

"It is often claimed that Israel’s attack on Egypt that began the June 1967 “Six Day War” was a “preemptive” one. Implicit in that description is the notion that Israel was under imminent threat of an attack from Egypt. Yet this historical interpretation of the war is not sustained by the documentary record.

The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack.............the CIA assessed that Nasser’s military presence in the Sinai was defensive,..............Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Despite its total lack of sustainability from the documentary record, and despite such admissions from top Israeli officials, it is virtually obligatory for commentators in contemporary mainstream accounts of the ’67 war to describe Israel’s attack on Egypt as “preemptive”.

Israel s attack on Egypt in June 67 was not preemptive Foreign Policy Journal

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

 

[Phoenall]

No right of return under International law. video dismissed as being propaganda

She is a rights lawyer.

And you are not.

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

WHY DO YOU LIE the links where given and you tried to counter with a UN resolution that has no legal standing


The Politics Of The Palestinian Right Of Return - Forbes

The ‘right of return’ is sometimes explained away as being symbolic rather than practical, an element of the Palestinian ‘narrative’ regarding the blameless circumstances of their diaspora. Israelis are demanded to accept both the narrative, in which they are the villains, and the possibility of the mass return of Palestinians that would, by design, end Israel as a Jewish state.

 

[Phoenall]

Go do some research on the term 'pre emptive strike' liar. Israel had every reason to believe that Egypt was planning an attack on them.

Egypt mobilized forces by the Israeli border. They expelled peacekeeping forces that were placed there following the Suez Crisis. Egypt also closed the Strait of Tiran , which Israel said beforehand would be considered an act of war.
Why should Israel have waited until Egypt was going to attack them ??

"It is often claimed that Israel’s attack on Egypt that began the June 1967 “Six Day War” was a “preemptive” one. Implicit in that description is the notion that Israel was under imminent threat of an attack from Egypt. Yet this historical interpretation of the war is not sustained by the documentary record.

The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack.............the CIA assessed that Nasser’s military presence in the Sinai was defensive,..............Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Despite its total lack of sustainability from the documentary record, and despite such admissions from top Israeli officials, it is virtually obligatory for commentators in contemporary mainstream accounts of the ’67 war to describe Israel’s attack on Egypt as “preemptive”.

Israel s attack on Egypt in June 67 was not preemptive Foreign Policy Journal

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

 

[montelatici]

She is a rights lawyer.

And you are not.

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

WHY DO YOU LIE the links where given and you tried to counter with a UN resolution that has no legal standing


The Politics Of The Palestinian Right Of Return - Forbes

The ‘right of return’ is sometimes explained away as being symbolic rather than practical, an element of the Palestinian ‘narrative’ regarding the blameless circumstances of their diaspora. Israelis are demanded to accept both the narrative, in which they are the villains, and the possibility of the mass return of Palestinians that would, by design, end Israel as a Jewish state.

Now, why would I (or any neutral) believe an opinion piece written by two self-serving Zionists?

 

[montelatici]

"It is often claimed that Israel’s attack on Egypt that began the June 1967 “Six Day War” was a “preemptive” one. Implicit in that description is the notion that Israel was under imminent threat of an attack from Egypt. Yet this historical interpretation of the war is not sustained by the documentary record.

The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack.............the CIA assessed that Nasser’s military presence in the Sinai was defensive,..............Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Despite its total lack of sustainability from the documentary record, and despite such admissions from top Israeli officials, it is virtually obligatory for commentators in contemporary mainstream accounts of the ’67 war to describe Israel’s attack on Egypt as “preemptive”.

Israel s attack on Egypt in June 67 was not preemptive Foreign Policy Journal

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

 

[MJB12741]

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

 

[P F Tinmore]

She is a rights lawyer.

And you are not.

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

WHY DO YOU LIE the links where given and you tried to counter with a UN resolution that has no legal standing


The Politics Of The Palestinian Right Of Return - Forbes

The ‘right of return’ is sometimes explained away as being symbolic rather than practical, an element of the Palestinian ‘narrative’ regarding the blameless circumstances of their diaspora. Israelis are demanded to accept both the narrative, in which they are the villains, and the possibility of the mass return of Palestinians that would, by design, end Israel as a Jewish state.

Both authors of this hit piece are associated with the Middle East Forum.

The MEF is a conservative think tank founded in 1990 by Danial Pipes.

 

[montelatici]

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

 

[Phoenall]

And there is no legal right of return, and that does not need a lawyer to explain why.

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

WHY DO YOU LIE the links where given and you tried to counter with a UN resolution that has no legal standing


The Politics Of The Palestinian Right Of Return - Forbes

The ‘right of return’ is sometimes explained away as being symbolic rather than practical, an element of the Palestinian ‘narrative’ regarding the blameless circumstances of their diaspora. Israelis are demanded to accept both the narrative, in which they are the villains, and the possibility of the mass return of Palestinians that would, by design, end Israel as a Jewish state.

Now, why would I (or any neutral) believe an opinion piece written by two self-serving Zionists?

STOP LYING all your posts are biased against Israel and the Jews, and some are RACIST LIES as well. Would you believe the UN who say that it is not a legal right.

UN Resolution 194 and the Right of Return



Of the 15 paragraphs, the first six sections addressed ways to achieve a truce; the next four paragraphs addressed the ways that Jerusalem and surrounding villages and towns should be demilitarized, and how an international zone or jurisdiction would be created in and around Jerusalem. The resolution also called on all parties to protect and allow free access to holy places, including religious buildings.

One paragraph has drawn the most attention: Paragraph 11, which alone addressed the issue of refugees and compensation for those whose property was lost or damaged. Contrary to Arab claims, it did not guarantee a Right of Return and certainly did not guarantee anunconditionalRight of Return – that is the right of Palestinian Arab refugees to return to Israel. Nor did it specifically mentionArabrefugees, thereby indicating that the resolution was aimed at all refugees, both Jewish and Arab. Instead, Resolution 194 recommended that refugees be allowed to return to their homelandifthey met two important conditions:

1. That they be willing to live in peace with their neighbors.

2. That the return takes place “at the earliest practicable date.”

 

[Phoenall]

Try looking up operation dawn as it destroys your whole premise on the 6 days war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dawn_(1967)

Wiki destroys nothing. It is an editing war between partisans.

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Its what the Egyptians said happened, and why they were caught with their pants down. And it is also what the Russians said when the US told them about the impending attack that would escalate into a bloodbath with the US coming to the aid of Israel.
You did not post the CIA report you posted one persons abridged version of events, showing that you will use any LIES to bolster your Jew Hatred.

 

[Phoenall]

Only because it destroys your argument and shows that Egypt was about to attack Israel until the Russians told them not to

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

Do you, or more precisely to attack another countries children far from the wart zone. For every Israeli child harmed by the Palestinians I would take into administrative custody 100 Palestinian children as hostages for stopping the terrorist attacks. I would place them in the areas that hamas target and let them take whatever measures they want.

 

[montelatici]

Who says?

The UN, ICC, ICJ and international law. And the links have been posted before to show this

Making things up again Phoney. No such links were ever posted. You saying so doesn't make it true, in fact, 99% of the time the exact opposite of what you post is the truth.

WHY DO YOU LIE the links where given and you tried to counter with a UN resolution that has no legal standing


The Politics Of The Palestinian Right Of Return - Forbes

The ‘right of return’ is sometimes explained away as being symbolic rather than practical, an element of the Palestinian ‘narrative’ regarding the blameless circumstances of their diaspora. Israelis are demanded to accept both the narrative, in which they are the villains, and the possibility of the mass return of Palestinians that would, by design, end Israel as a Jewish state.

Now, why would I (or any neutral) believe an opinion piece written by two self-serving Zionists?

STOP LYING all your posts are biased against Israel and the Jews, and some are RACIST LIES as well. Would you believe the UN who say that it is not a legal right.

UN Resolution 194 and the Right of Return



Of the 15 paragraphs, the first six sections addressed ways to achieve a truce; the next four paragraphs addressed the ways that Jerusalem and surrounding villages and towns should be demilitarized, and how an international zone or jurisdiction would be created in and around Jerusalem. The resolution also called on all parties to protect and allow free access to holy places, including religious buildings.

One paragraph has drawn the most attention: Paragraph 11, which alone addressed the issue of refugees and compensation for those whose property was lost or damaged. Contrary to Arab claims, it did not guarantee a Right of Return and certainly did not guarantee anunconditionalRight of Return – that is the right of Palestinian Arab refugees to return to Israel. Nor did it specifically mentionArabrefugees, thereby indicating that the resolution was aimed at all refugees, both Jewish and Arab. Instead, Resolution 194 recommended that refugees be allowed to return to their homelandifthey met two important conditions:

1. That they be willing to live in peace with their neighbors.

2. That the return takes place “at the earliest practicable date.”

Do you believe that posting an opinion, a Zionist opinion, makes your case?

 

[MJB12741]

It just shows what the most recent Hasbara editor wrote. The record (per the link posted earlier) shows that the CIA knew that Egypt was preparing to defend itself from a planned Israeli invasion.

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

Do you, or more precisely to attack another countries children far from the wart zone. For every Israeli child harmed by the Palestinians I would take into administrative custody 100 Palestinian children as hostages for stopping the terrorist attacks. I would place them in the areas that hamas target and let them take whatever measures they want.

If I were prime minister of Israel I would go much further. I would schedule a peace meeting with all known Hamas leaders, all expences paid by Israel at the finest resort in Tel Aviv including the finest of rooms, elegant dining & entertainment. The morning of the meeting I would first thank & welcome each & every one of them for attending. And then I would make an announcement that from now on, each time Hamas kills an Israeli, Israel will retaliate by killing 10,000 Palestinians. What other suggestions do you have to establish peace?

 

[montelatici]

BULLSHIT ISLAMOMORON LIES The Russians told Egypt to stand down as they could not support their planned attack on Israel

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

Do you, or more precisely to attack another countries children far from the wart zone. For every Israeli child harmed by the Palestinians I would take into administrative custody 100 Palestinian children as hostages for stopping the terrorist attacks. I would place them in the areas that hamas target and let them take whatever measures they want.

If I were prime minister of Israel I would go much further. I would schedule a peace meeting with all known Hamas leaders, all expences paid by Israel at the finest resort in Tel Aviv including the finest of rooms, elegant dining & entertainment. The morning of the meeting I would first thank & welcome each & every one of them for attending. And then I would make an announcement that from now on, each time Hamas kills an Israeli, Israel will retaliate by killing 10,000 Palestinians. What other suggestions do you have to establish peace?

Sounds like Nazi policy in occupied territory with a turbocharger. Well done you are now an official ZioNazi.

"MARCH 24, 1944
SS MEN MASSACRE ITALIANS NEAR ROME
Units of the SS (the elite guard of the Nazi state) shoot more than 300 Italians in the Ardeatine Caves, south of Rome, in reaction to a partisan attack on German soldiers. Ten hostages are shot for every German soldier killed. The SS blow up the caves after the massacre."

German Rule in Occupied Europe

 

[MJB12741]

That's not what the CIA's record, as linked from their site, states. You can make up all you want or repeat Israeli propaganda, it doesn't make it true.

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

Do you, or more precisely to attack another countries children far from the wart zone. For every Israeli child harmed by the Palestinians I would take into administrative custody 100 Palestinian children as hostages for stopping the terrorist attacks. I would place them in the areas that hamas target and let them take whatever measures they want.

If I were prime minister of Israel I would go much further. I would schedule a peace meeting with all known Hamas leaders, all expences paid by Israel at the finest resort in Tel Aviv including the finest of rooms, elegant dining & entertainment. The morning of the meeting I would first thank & welcome each & every one of them for attending. And then I would make an announcement that from now on, each time Hamas kills an Israeli, Israel will retaliate by killing 10,000 Palestinians. What other suggestions do you have to establish peace?

Sounds like Nazi policy in occupied territory with a turbocharger. Well done you are now an official ZioNazi.

"MARCH 24, 1944
SS MEN MASSACRE ITALIANS NEAR ROME
Units of the SS (the elite guard of the Nazi state) shoot more than 300 Italians in the Ardeatine Caves, south of Rome, in reaction to a partisan attack on German soldiers. Ten hostages are shot for every German soldier killed. The SS blow up the caves after the massacre."

German Rule in Occupied Europe

How dare you call me of all people a ZioNazi. I despise both Zionists & Nazi's for their brutal treatment of others. What kind of people make peace offerings to Palestinians, build a security fence & concede them their own land to keep them in Israel when all the Palestinians want is to be free from Israel? Not even once have those Zionists tried to help free the Palestinians back to their indigenous homelands. Shame on them!

 

[aris2chat]

Five Arab nations unite at several positions on Israel's border & close the Gulf of Aqaba. Israel responds & gains additional land in the process to prevent that from happening again. Accept it Pali supporters. It is what it is.

So, you believe that a blockade to prevent a country from receiving weapons/strategic materials is sufficient cause for a country to attack another country?

Do you, or more precisely to attack another countries children far from the wart zone. For every Israeli child harmed by the Palestinians I would take into administrative custody 100 Palestinian children as hostages for stopping the terrorist attacks. I would place them in the areas that hamas target and let them take whatever measures they want.

If I were prime minister of Israel I would go much further. I would schedule a peace meeting with all known Hamas leaders, all expences paid by Israel at the finest resort in Tel Aviv including the finest of rooms, elegant dining & entertainment. The morning of the meeting I would first thank & welcome each & every one of them for attending. And then I would make an announcement that from now on, each time Hamas kills an Israeli, Israel will retaliate by killing 10,000 Palestinians. What other suggestions do you have to establish peace?

Sounds like Nazi policy in occupied territory with a turbocharger. Well done you are now an official ZioNazi.

"MARCH 24, 1944
SS MEN MASSACRE ITALIANS NEAR ROME
Units of the SS (the elite guard of the Nazi state) shoot more than 300 Italians in the Ardeatine Caves, south of Rome, in reaction to a partisan attack on German soldiers. Ten hostages are shot for every German soldier killed. The SS blow up the caves after the massacre."

German Rule in Occupied Europe

How dare you call me of all people a ZioNazi. I despise both Zionists & Nazi's for their brutal treatment of others. What kind of people make peace offerings to Palestinians, build a security fence & concede them their own land to keep them in Israel when all the Palestinians want is to be free from Israel? Not even once have those Zionists tried to help free the Palestinians back to their indigenous homelands. Shame on them!

the weak resort to vile name calling instead of making a good argument or presentation of facts