I suppose my focus was on the primary functions of government: to serve the governed and to provide for their health, safety and well being. The Abbas government has chosen to provide for the killers it creates to the detriment of the general population. I do make judgements about such matters. I think it's important to do so. Amidst the endless whining from the Pals and their pompous demands for statehood, their ''leadership'' refuses to perform the most basic functions of government, seemingly because the business of civil government infringes on their primary focus of managing a criminal / Islamic terrorist syndicate.RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,
BLUF: This is one of those "Gray Areas" in the law.
(COMMENT)... What is a common theme in these articles is a presumption that Israel has some presumed obligation to provide medical services to the islamic terrorist enclaves which breed islamic terrorists who kill Israeli citizens.
The Hague Regulation said:Article 43. The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.[/indent]International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights said:Article 12
1. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.
2. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.
3. The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.SOURCE: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, A/RES/2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976,
[/indent]International Covenant on Economic said:Article 12
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
SOURCE: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, A/RES/2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 3 January 1976
Health care is one of those issues that the Arab Palestinians DO NOT enjoy and the same Human Development Level as Israel.
It seems that in
◈ Area "A" where the Arab Palestinians have full civil and security control, the health and well-being are the responsibility of the Ramallah Government. ◈ Area "B" is a gray area wherein the Arab Palestinian civil control and partial security control - so goes the responsibility for health and well-being.◈ Area "C" where the Israeli have full civil and security control, the health and well-being are the responsibility of the Jerusalem (Israeli) Government. (NO QUESTION) But how do the Israelis accomplish this task?◈ The Gaza Strip, HAMAS claims control.
But medical services are one of those services where the patient can refuse care. By Human Rights Law (International Covenant) and International Humanitarian Law (Hague Regulation), the International Community will undoubtedly hold Israel responsible since it is the most developed nation and the only functional government within the territory formerly under the Mandate (East of the Jordan River). Theoretically, Human Rights and Humanitarian Concerns are outside political debate.
It is my understanding that Israel DID NOT refuse the Arab Palestinians COVID-19 Vaccine. The Arab Palestinians DID NOT request COVID-19 Vaccine from Israel.
The question is, has this turned into a political football?
Most Respectfully,R