White House inadvertently texted top-secret Yemen war plans to journalist

It's always da evil Jews, isn't it? :rolleyes: Riddle me this, your previous post is talking about how AIPAC donated hundreds of millions to Trump's campaign, i.e. you're implying they control Trump. and now this post is claiming that Goldberg is 'closely' related to AIPAC, but yet Goldberg hates Trump? Your conspiracy theories regarding 'da evil Jews' isn't quite lining up.
Yo Vern, save you "antisemite" card for another time


Even Jewish Mike Blumenthal agrees that MIKE WALTZ had the means , motive and opportunity to BACKSTAB President Trump



@ 1:20
 
Your story is changing. You were whining and crying about the SC ruling……..and lying about it. I just called out your lie.

Why would it need to be spelled out that a President can’t be prosecuted for exercising the power the Constitution gives him? Are you really that stupid? Rhetorical.
the constitution is clear, the SC followed constitutional law.
Yes it is.
WHERE in the constitution does it give the president or anyone else immunity?
 
Post where it says he can be prosecuted for doing his official duties.
Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Following an impeachment conviction by the Senate, the President could be removed from office and convicted of a crime. This is the exact remedy a prosecutor would seek. Therefore, when looking at Fitzgerald through a plaintiff's lens, the President is “above the law” in civil cases but not in criminal cases.
 
Yo Dingle Berry , as SCOTUS clearly stated if the President's actions are within the confines of ARTICLE II he has immunity
That's the corrupt supreme court, not the constitution.
Why don't you find a thread about basketweaving and stay there
Because RWNJ's would turn that into political drama too.
They could turn making a tuna fish sandwich into a political shit show.
 
Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Following an impeachment conviction by the Senate, the President could be removed from office and convicted of a crime. This is the exact remedy a prosecutor would seek. Therefore, when looking at Fitzgerald through a plaintiff's lens, the President is “above the law” in civil cases but not in criminal cases.
HUH?

Legal authority for your "conclusion"
 
I suggest you re read it as it does in fact grant immunity, try the section on senators and congressmen. If they have it so does the President.
For civil cases, not criminal.
Not true anymore, the corrupt supreme court gave your dear leader limited immunity all his actions.
Depending......................To be determined.
 
That's the corrupt supreme court, not the constitution.

Because RWNJ's would turn that into political drama too.
They could turn making a tuna fish sandwich into a political shit show.
How retarded can they go?

So according to the Socialist Demon Rats , the president can comply with Article II provisos yet find himself in violation of the Law if he pisses Hakeem or Chuck off ?!?!?!?!?!?
 
15th post
Well, it WAS the US constitution but the Trump courts are destroying that.
1743517647262.webp
 
Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Following an impeachment conviction by the Senate, the President could be removed from office and convicted of a crime. This is the exact remedy a prosecutor would seek. Therefore, when looking at Fitzgerald through a plaintiff's lens, the President is “above the law” in civil cases but not in criminal cases.
Don’t see “official duties” in that, Simp.

You lose.

:dance::dance::dance::dance:
 
How retarded can they go?

So according to the Socialist Demon Rats , the president can comply with Article II provisos yet find himself in violation of the Law if he pisses Hakeem or Chuck off ?!?!?!?!?!?
According to RWNJ's a president doesn't even have to do that.

Rep. Marjorie Greene files articles of impeachment against ...

1743518008843.webp
The Hill
https://thehill.com › homenews › house › 535317-rep-...
Jan 21, 2021 — Rep. Marjorie Greene (R-Ga.) said Thursday that she has filed articles of impeachment against President Biden, only a day after he was sworn ...
Don’t see “official duties” in that, Simp.

You lose.

:dance::dance::dance::dance:
You lose Q-NUT.
It was the corrupt supreme court that included "official duties"........DUMB ASS.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom