Whistle Blower Outted -- It is a Brennen era operative....

[Thinker101]

Sure, listening to you clowns it's the end of the world every 20 minutes.

Then justify the phone call. Tell us how it was in the best interest of the nation. It benefits the 2020 re-election campaign, but how does it benefit our nation?

To help identify the corruption in politics.

Well then, he certainly did expose corruption in politics! He's gonna get impeached for it.

Trump isn't going to get impeached. A lot of Democrats are going to be unwilling to stab their deplorable constituents in the back.

I'll bet you all the money in my checking account against all the money in yours that Trump will face trial in the Senate before you wish anyone Happy New Year.

The ostrich defense doesn't even work for ostriches.

That's alright, I don't need $1.99.

 

[Seawytch]

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

Just find the individuals who changed the whistle-blower rules to allow hearsay...This has been planned out & set up for months!

Democrats would be grasping at straws if they hadn't banned them.

The whistleblower rules were in place since May 24, 2018.

Trump called Zelensky on July 25, 2019.

The recent complain was received in Aug. 12, 2019.

That's one heck of a crystal ball these guys are consulting, changing rules so far in advance, more than a year before Trump extorted Zelensky, and almost a year before the latter was even elected. And you are so very perspicacious to bring this to our attention. Pure genius.

worth repeating....

the form was printed in May of 2018, a year and 3 months before the whistleblower reported it in Aug of 2019

yeah, one heck of crystal ball....!!!!!

You'd think these right wingers would know better by now to not believe their sources without checking them....

plus the IG weighed in with a tweet, saying the whistle blower gave them BOTH first hand and second hand info, and his investigators corroborated the second hand info.

You just look dumber by the day. There was NO first hand information since the LEAKER, not whistleblower was NOT present. There has been NO corroboration of any of your lies. You just look completely desperate as this whole thing is blowing up in your face. Again.

Aww, it's so adorable watching rightards run with talking points.

Those aren't talking points, those are flat out falsehoods.

 

[Faun]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

Wrong. Even Dims accept the fact that the rule changed.

Yeah, a year and a half ago.

 

[Contumacious]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

Indeed

This is NOT an impeachment proceeding - this is an old fashion banana republic Coup D' Etat.

An impeachment proceeding is one authorized by the Constitution for high crimes and misdemeanors - there are no allegations that the Prez has committed one of those;

There is NO evidence that the accuser is a "whistleblower" the info is that he works for CIA

There is NO evidence that he has personal knowledge of the allegations

We must NOT allowed the Lamestream Media, Deep state and Demo Rats define whistleblower.


.

.

 

[Faun]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

That's "coup de etat"

It is a coup! ^^^


The President tweeting just now!

and he is ABSOLUTELY right

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

As I learn more and more each day, I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the....
....People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!

Inciting violence, yet more reason to impeach him. The sooner the better.

 

[skye]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

That's "coup de etat"

It is a coup! ^^^


The President tweeting just now!

and he is ABSOLUTELY right

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

As I learn more and more each day, I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the....
....People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!

Inciting violence, yet more reason to impeach him. The sooner the better.

dream on

take a tablet...for your TDS condition

 

[Kondor3]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

Don't care if it's Joe McCarthy or Julius Rosenberg reincarnated... so long as he/she/it is telling the truth in this context.

 

[Faun]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

That's "coup de etat"

It is a coup! ^^^


The President tweeting just now!

and he is ABSOLUTELY right

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

As I learn more and more each day, I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the....
....People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!

Inciting violence, yet more reason to impeach him. The sooner the better.

dream on

take a tablet...for your TDS condition

Save those for those impeaching trump. You're gonna need them to soothe yourself.

 

[Crepitus]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

Wrong. Even Dims accept the fact that the rule changed.

Yeah, a year and a half ago.

Not even then.

"In a statement issued late Monday afternoon, the inspector general of the intelligence community (ICIG) said that the form submitted by the whistleblower on August 12, 2019, was the same one the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018. The statement reiterated the fact that having firsthand knowledge of the event has never been required in order to submit a whistleblower complaint. "Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute."
"In fact," the ICIG's statement continues, "by law the Complainant...need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law.""

Fact check: Trump and other Republicans falsely claim whistleblower rules changed just before Ukraine complaint - CNNPolitics

 

[Contumacious]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

Wrong. Even Dims accept the fact that the rule changed.

Yeah, a year and a half ago.

Not even then.

"In a statement issued late Monday afternoon, the inspector general of the intelligence community (ICIG) said that the form submitted by the whistleblower on August 12, 2019, was the same one the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018. The statement reiterated the fact that having firsthand knowledge of the event has never been required in order to submit a whistleblower complaint. "Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute."
"In fact," the ICIG's statement continues, "by law the Complainant...need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law.""

Fact check: Trump and other Republicans falsely claim whistleblower rules changed just before Ukraine complaint - CNNPolitics

Bullfeathers

Only Congress can amend the statute. The Federal Circuit is the ONLY Court that hears whistleblower complainst. Itb has ruled that:


The government similarly argues that petitioner did not have a "reasonable belief" as required by the statute regarding many of the alleged disclosures. The WPA requires that the employee have a reasonable belief that he is disclosing: 1) a violation of law, rule, or regulation; or 2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)(A); LaChance v. White, 174 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed. Cir. 1999); Frederick v. Dep't of Justice, 73 F.3d 349, 352 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Specifically, the government argues that petitioner could not have a reasonable belief that he was disclosing a violation or gross mismanagement because several of the disclosures were apparently based on rumor, namely the May 22, 1998, disclosure concerning the practice of hiring analysts and "impermissibly" converting them into auditors, and the June 18, 1998, disclosure concerning the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits instructing employees to falsify their government employment applications. The government urges that if petitioner does not have a factual basis for an allegation, he cannot have made a protected disclosure, citing Frederick, 73 F.3d at 353. Unfortunately, the Board failed to determine if petitioner presented evidence of his reasonable belief concerning these disclosures. We decline the government's invitation to decide the reasonable belief question in the first instance. We remand to the Board to address the issue of whether petitioner had the required reasonable belief with respect to the allegations."


Huffman v. Office of Personnel Management, 263 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 08/15/2001)


.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The president falsely claimed rules for whistleblowers had recently been changed, suggesting they used to require reports of only firsthand information.

Intelligence Community's Inspector General Denies Trump Whistleblower Conspiracy

Trump is a pathological liar.

What a ******* liar you are... Read the god damn press release TODAY from the DNI chief himself, he throws his IG under the bus as a liar!.

Not true. And we all know it. Even you.

Speak for yourself chump and keep the rest of us out of you wet dream.

But you do know it. Nobody could really be dumb enough to swallow that crap and still be capable of posting on a message board.

Could they?

You simply need to look in the mirror to answer that one.

 

[Care4all]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

Wrong. Even Dims accept the fact that the rule changed.

Yeah, a year and a half ago.

Not even then.

"In a statement issued late Monday afternoon, the inspector general of the intelligence community (ICIG) said that the form submitted by the whistleblower on August 12, 2019, was the same one the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018. The statement reiterated the fact that having firsthand knowledge of the event has never been required in order to submit a whistleblower complaint. "Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute."
"In fact," the ICIG's statement continues, "by law the Complainant...need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law.""

Fact check: Trump and other Republicans falsely claim whistleblower rules changed just before Ukraine complaint - CNNPolitics

Bullfeathers

Only Congress can amend the statute. The Federal Circuit is the ONLY Court that hears whistleblower complainst. Itb has ruled that:


The government similarly argues that petitioner did not have a "reasonable belief" as required by the statute regarding many of the alleged disclosures. The WPA requires that the employee have a reasonable belief that he is disclosing: 1) a violation of law, rule, or regulation; or 2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)(A); LaChance v. White, 174 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed. Cir. 1999); Frederick v. Dep't of Justice, 73 F.3d 349, 352 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Specifically, the government argues that petitioner could not have a reasonable belief that he was disclosing a violation or gross mismanagement because several of the disclosures were apparently based on rumor, namely the May 22, 1998, disclosure concerning the practice of hiring analysts and "impermissibly" converting them into auditors, and the June 18, 1998, disclosure concerning the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits instructing employees to falsify their government employment applications. The government urges that if petitioner does not have a factual basis for an allegation, he cannot have made a protected disclosure, citing Frederick, 73 F.3d at 353. Unfortunately, the Board failed to determine if petitioner presented evidence of his reasonable belief concerning these disclosures. We decline the government's invitation to decide the reasonable belief question in the first instance. We remand to the Board to address the issue of whether petitioner had the required reasonable belief with respect to the allegations."


Huffman v. Office of Personnel Management, 263 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 08/15/2001)


.

and that supports what the IG said in his statement on it... the whistle blower had both direct and indirect knowledge in his complaint and had access to be 'in the know' with his 2nd hand/indirect knowledge, AND the IG's investigation of the complaint's indirect complaints were found credible and URGENT through the IG's investigators working the case

 

[Billy_Bob]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

Don't care if it's Joe McCarthy or Julius Rosenberg reincarnated... so long as he/she/it is telling the truth in this context.

The problem is they were not truthful.. They lied... And they need to be held accountable!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What exactly is a "Coup De'Taut"?

You uneducated, ignorant bootlickers are hilarious, ROTFLMAO.

Take a look at the actions of the democrats that is what a coup de'taut looks like

LOL

You got that wrong... it's taut de' coup.

Fine I hope you are one of those with their backs against the firing line wall

 

[Kondor3]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

Don't care if it's Joe McCarthy or Julius Rosenberg reincarnated... so long as he/she/it is telling the truth in this context.

The problem is they were not truthful.. They lied... And they need to be held accountable!

We do not yet know whether the Whistleblower(s) were truthful or not. The Impeachment Inquiry will give us those answers.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Aha! The resident spell checker to the rescue!

That's "Chequer" thank you very much

Actually it's about his choice of "outed". As if whistleblowing was some kind of shady activity. Depending I have no doubt upon whose whistle is being blown.

It speaks volumes that OP thinks exposing corruption deserved some sort of retribution.
Sorry, make that rettribbuttion.

"Outed" my ass.

You seem to "out" yourself as an ass with every post. Classic strategy of making yourself feel better about you by denigrating silly misspellings and grammatical errors. This all pointing at various players from the prior admin, perhaps it will be entertaining.

Lemme get this straight here Hunior.... you've been here all of six weeks and you purport to anal - yze my "every post" huh.

Classic.

Go learn to read. The point was, is, and shall remain, that the OP's values are such that he thinks a whistleblower can be "outed".

SMGDH

You've been pegged as an arrogant asshole, to much empirical proof to deny it. Deal with it. You were far more concerned with his spelling .

Obviously that's all you read, because it's all you can handle, isn't that right Snowflake.

The fact is, a post solely focused on spelling would be verboten here. That's why I included material on his choice of verb. But you can't handle that, so you go

To quote a famous movie line, welcome to the big leagues, Hayseed.

You aren't my "league" boy, you hide behind parsing and semantics and think it makes you look smart. Perhaps I should point out the fact that I said "mostly" and not "solely". Perhaps you missed that lil fella? So much for your self ascribed brilliance.

Welcome to the "big leagues" kid. My point stands, you were far more interested in attacking him for his spelling and the words he chose. You really aren't interested in ever addressing any given topic, just attacking those who do. As to the topic, well thus far all you have is the media spin that Trumps going down, you know, the same thing that's been said for the last 3 years.

 

[JustAGuy1]

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

Just find the individuals who changed the whistle-blower rules to allow hearsay...This has been planned out & set up for months!

Democrats would be grasping at straws if they hadn't banned them.

The whistleblower rules were in place since May 24, 2018.

Trump called Zelensky on July 25, 2019.

The recent complain was received in Aug. 12, 2019.

That's one heck of a crystal ball these guys are consulting, changing rules so far in advance, more than a year before Trump extorted Zelensky, and almost a year before the latter was even elected. And you are so very perspicacious to bring this to our attention. Pure genius.

Nope, they changed it last week, do try and keep up.

Anything changed last week had nothing to do with the Whistleblower since they filed their complaint 7 weeks ago.

And yet they sat on it until they could trot t out as is....I thought you were better than that son?

 

[Lesh]

None of which matters since what was released of the call itself...corroborates the WB Report

 

[Crepitus]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

Wrong. Even Dims accept the fact that the rule changed.

Yeah, a year and a half ago.

Not even then.

"In a statement issued late Monday afternoon, the inspector general of the intelligence community (ICIG) said that the form submitted by the whistleblower on August 12, 2019, was the same one the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018. The statement reiterated the fact that having firsthand knowledge of the event has never been required in order to submit a whistleblower complaint. "Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute."
"In fact," the ICIG's statement continues, "by law the Complainant...need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law.""

Fact check: Trump and other Republicans falsely claim whistleblower rules changed just before Ukraine complaint - CNNPolitics

Bullfeathers

Only Congress can amend the statute. The Federal Circuit is the ONLY Court that hears whistleblower complainst. Itb has ruled that:


The government similarly argues that petitioner did not have a "reasonable belief" as required by the statute regarding many of the alleged disclosures. The WPA requires that the employee have a reasonable belief that he is disclosing: 1) a violation of law, rule, or regulation; or 2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)(A); LaChance v. White, 174 F.3d 1378, 1380-81 (Fed. Cir. 1999); Frederick v. Dep't of Justice, 73 F.3d 349, 352 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Specifically, the government argues that petitioner could not have a reasonable belief that he was disclosing a violation or gross mismanagement because several of the disclosures were apparently based on rumor, namely the May 22, 1998, disclosure concerning the practice of hiring analysts and "impermissibly" converting them into auditors, and the June 18, 1998, disclosure concerning the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits instructing employees to falsify their government employment applications. The government urges that if petitioner does not have a factual basis for an allegation, he cannot have made a protected disclosure, citing Frederick, 73 F.3d at 353. Unfortunately, the Board failed to determine if petitioner presented evidence of his reasonable belief concerning these disclosures. We decline the government's invitation to decide the reasonable belief question in the first instance. We remand to the Board to address the issue of whether petitioner had the required reasonable belief with respect to the allegations."


Huffman v. Office of Personnel Management, 263 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 08/15/2001)


.

The IG's statement is linked in my post. Argue with him.

 

[Crepitus]

The president falsely claimed rules for whistleblowers had recently been changed, suggesting they used to require reports of only firsthand information.

Intelligence Community's Inspector General Denies Trump Whistleblower Conspiracy

Trump is a pathological liar.

What a ******* liar you are... Read the god damn press release TODAY from the DNI chief himself, he throws his IG under the bus as a liar!.

Not true. And we all know it. Even you.

Speak for yourself chump and keep the rest of us out of you wet dream.

But you do know it. Nobody could really be dumb enough to swallow that crap and still be capable of posting on a message board.

Could they?

You simply need to look in the mirror to answer that one.

All right, you want everyone to know who dumb you are, keep believing it.