Which should have first priority: The woman, the fertilized egg, or the fetus?

[martybegan]

The woman. She is the only one who experiences life, and the only one capable of making choices.

Why do you thnk you should have thw right to end a human life for no other reason than it is convenient for you to do so?

This fails as a straw man fallacy.

Moreover, citizens are not required to justify the exercising of a fundamental right, such as the right to privacy, as a prerequisite to indeed do so.

So i shouldn't have to justify to the NYPD why I need a concealed carry permit, right?

 

[martybegan]

Because I am the only one who can make a choice, and I am responsible for my body and anything residing in it.

Correct you are responsible for that unborn child residing IN your body but not OF your body and the man is equally responsible.

Plus I assume you agree that you must be responsible from what is inserted into your body.

The man is not responsible for anything in my body. I am.

But, wait for it, once its OUT of the body, THEN he has to support it, right?

 

[Lakhota]

As of this minute, 75% of voters believe the woman should have first priority. This is good - and better than I expected.

 

[Stephanie]

omg, why give this troll free rein to puke their ugly BS all over us?

 

[OriginalShroom]

As of this minute, 75% of voters believe the woman should have first priority. This is good - and better than I expected.

Most of us are saying it is conditional upon the Mother's life being at risk. Not her "I'm not ready to be mother" or "I'm too busy at work" feelings.

 

[Stephanie]

Democrats are some sick freaks...Can't let a PRO-LIFE person stand in the way of getting RID of those babies..

SNIP:
Abortion, Politics - U.S.Wed Jul 16, 2014 - 5:02 pm EST

Congresswoman visits Planned Parenthood, thanks escorts for protecting women from pro-life message

Congresswoman Katherine Clark, D-MA, visited a Planned Parenthood abortion facility Saturday to thank its volunteer abortion “escorts” for helping pregnant women evade pro-life sidewalk counselors who might offer them alternatives to abortion. She made the visit after the Supreme Court struck down the state’s “buffer zone” law, which required sidewalk counselors and pro-life protesters to stay at least 35 feet away from the clinic.

In a statement, Clark slammed the Supreme Court for its decision, and likened the prayers and assistance offered by most sidewalk counselors to “harassment and intimidation.”

“The Court’s ruling means patients are forced to choose between the medical care they need and being within arm’s length of potential harm, harassment or intimidation,” said Clark. “The walk from a car to a doctor’s office is a very long one for the women who face this fear. Volunteer escorts provide compassion and safety so that these women can access the health care they need and deserve.”

all of it here
Congresswoman visits Planned Parenthood, thanks escorts for protecting women from pro-life message | News | LifeSite

 

[Lakhota]

As of this minute, 75% of voters believe the woman should have first priority. This is good - and better than I expected.

Most of us are saying it is conditional upon the Mother's life being at risk. Not her "I'm not ready to be mother" or "I'm too busy at work" feelings.

The poll was intentionally not designed to address such variables.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why do you thnk you should have thw right to end a human life for no other reason than it is convenient for you to do so?

Because I am the only one who can make a choice, and I am responsible for my body and anything residing in it.

Correct you are responsible for that unborn child residing IN your body but not OF your body and the man is equally responsible.

Plus I assume you agree that you must be responsible from what is inserted into your body.

false, false, and false

 

[M14 Shooter]

Because I am the only one who can make a choice, and I am responsible for my body and anything residing in it.

So... You should have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?
Why?

Because it is my body.

The human life that you chose to end for your convenience is -not- your body.
And so, I ask again
Why should you have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?

 

[chikenwing]

So... You should have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?
Why?

Because it is my body.

The human life that you chose to end for your convenience is -not- your body.
And so, i ask again
Why should you have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?

What kind parent would end the life of their own child,for their convenience,what kind of person is that??

 

[M14 Shooter]

Because it is my body.

The human life that you chose to end for your convenience is -not- your body.
And so, i ask again
Why should you have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?

What kind parent would end the life of their own child,for their convenience,what kind of person is that??

Not sure that "extraordinarily selfish" is strong enough a term.
How about "irresponsibly self-important"?

 

[chikenwing]

The human life that you chose to end for your convenience is -not- your body.
And so, i ask again
Why should you have the right to end a human life for no other reason that it is convenient for you to do so based on where that human life happens to be?

What kind parent would end the life of their own child,for their convenience,what kind of person is that??

Not sure that "extraordinarily selfish" is strong enough a term.
How about "irresponsibly self-important"?

Its all about ME!!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Life begins at conception. If it begins it was God's will...and so the fertilized egg has first priority. If woman does not want the child...put it up for adoption.

Unless its cancer

 

[chikenwing]

Life begins at conception. If it begins it was God's will...and so the fertilized egg has first priority. If woman does not want the child...put it up for adoption.

Unless its cancer

Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience??

Respond to that question in a rational logical way and you might have some credibility otherwise,its just......................................................

 

[ClosedCaption]

Life begins at conception. If it begins it was God's will...and so the fertilized egg has first priority. If woman does not want the child...put it up for adoption.

Unless its cancer

Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience??

Respond to that question in a rational logical way and you might have some credibility otherwise,its just......................................................

So Cancer is Gods will and just let it do what it do?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The following is a question immaterial to this discussion: "Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience?"

Answer: not your business

 

[chikenwing]

The following is a question immaterial to this discussion: "Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience?"

Answer: not your business

Its very material,as shown by your response.

Now address the question,what kind of person would sacrifice their own child for their conveniences.

 

[chikenwing]

Unless its cancer

Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience??

Respond to that question in a rational logical way and you might have some credibility otherwise,its just......................................................

So Cancer is Gods will and just let it do what it do?

If you say so,I sure don't,but then you do like to pull shit out of your ass. Injecting cncer into the equation is irrelevant.

What kind of person would sacrifice one of their own children for their convenience,its a simple as hell question.

 

[Gracie]

The following is a question immaterial to this discussion: "Nice try,what kind of parent would kill their own children for their convenience?"

Answer: not your business

Its very material,as shown by your response.

Now address the question,what kind of person would sacrifice their own child for their conveniences.

How would you know if it is a convenience or not? ANY answer would not suit you because you already think it that way. And guess what? It isn't any of your business. You are not the host to the fetus, right?

Same o same o bullshit about other people wanting control of someone elses body.

 

[JakeStarkey]

chikenwing's simply twists evidence to his philosophy.

Thus his comments are immaterial.

He wants to control female bits and pieces.