Where’s The Evidence?? Are You Kidding??

as Trump and his lawyer Rudy continue to claim voter fraud in the court of public opinion, it fails in a actual court of law

At a hearing

When the judge asked Rudy to explain why none of his legal claim in the suit are based on voter fraud

Rudy the president lawyer admitted the campaign isn't pleading voter fraud, at all

There case that they want to take to the supreme court is that the system is not perfect and mistake are made. Because people make mistakes hundreds of thousands of votes should be thrown out.

Rudy clearing stating the obvious that proof of a conspiracy of voter fraud does not exists except in the mind of Trump and his supporters.

People make mistakes and the ballot is either thrown out or the voter has a change to correct the mistake.

Talk about desperation, they are better offer desperately seeking Susan.

There argument fail as they are all self serving. Yes both sides that lose contest elections but it is not to the point of being a waste of time.

But in a last rush to make executive decision, Trump is making policy changes as a lame duck.


Foreign troll alert. Find a better translation service, your English is atrocious and stinks of Eastern Block syntax errors
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.

"Hears", huh?

Sigh......I'm really barking up the wrong tree asking you guys to apply even basic common sense to this scenario, aren't i?
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.

"Hears", huh?

Sigh......I'm really barking up the wrong tree asking you guys to apply even basic common sense to this scenario, aren't i?

You spew the liberal narrative, we mock you. I think were were done here a few posts back.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.

"Hears", huh?

Sigh......I'm really barking up the wrong tree asking you guys to apply even basic common sense to this scenario, aren't i?

You spew the liberal narrative, we mock you. I think were were done here a few posts back.

And by the 'liberal narrative'... you mean asking If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court?

If that's all it takes to stump you guys cold, well......that was easy.
 
as Trump and his lawyer Rudy continue to claim voter fraud in the court of public opinion, it fails in a actual court of law

At a hearing

When the judge asked Rudy to explain why none of his legal claim in the suit are based on voter fraud

Rudy the president lawyer admitted the campaign isn't pleading voter fraud, at all

There case that they want to take to the supreme court is that the system is not perfect and mistake are made. Because people make mistakes hundreds of thousands of votes should be thrown out.

Rudy clearing stating the obvious that proof of a conspiracy of voter fraud does not exists except in the mind of Trump and his supporters.

People make mistakes and the ballot is either thrown out or the voter has a change to correct the mistake.

Talk about desperation, they are better offer desperately seeking Susan.

There argument fail as they are all self serving. Yes both sides that lose contest elections but it is not to the point of being a waste of time.

But in a last rush to make executive decision, Trump is making policy changes as a lame duck.


Foreign troll alert. Find a better translation service, your English is atrocious and stinks of Eastern Block syntax errors

Yeah well there is a link and if you believe that the link is from the Eastern Block well that is your error. But if your only concerns is my typing skills then I guess you admit that the article is correct and verifiable.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.

"Hears", huh?

Sigh......I'm really barking up the wrong tree asking you guys to apply even basic common sense to this scenario, aren't i?

Since you don't know what common sense is
Yes.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

^^^ hears the others.

"Hears", huh?

Sigh......I'm really barking up the wrong tree asking you guys to apply even basic common sense to this scenario, aren't i?

You spew the liberal narrative, we mock you. I think were were done here a few posts back.

Liberals wrote the Constitution. It is an anti-authoritarian document. You would suck up to the Crown.

We are a Liberal Democracy for a reason.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.
As if your lying ass knows anything about it.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.
You vile scum cannot be honest about anything. I never said shit about any evidence, I said you scum continually demand links and proof of things and the minute someone gives it to you deny it, lie and spin and ignore it.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.
Classic, you never fail to demonstrate how predictable you are.

progressive shill ROE



17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity/OAN
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.
You vile scum cannot be honest about anything. I never said shit about any evidence, I said you scum continually demand links and proof of things and the minute someone gives it to you deny it, lie and spin and ignore it.

And I said you're a liar. If Banana Republicans believed in law and order they wouldn't waste time in the Kangaroo court, but would present their evidence in a real court that has jurisdiction in the matter.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.
You vile scum cannot be honest about anything. I never said shit about any evidence, I said you scum continually demand links and proof of things and the minute someone gives it to you deny it, lie and spin and ignore it.

And I said you're a liar. If Banana Republicans believed in law and order they wouldn't waste time in the Kangaroo court, but would present their evidence in a real court that has jurisdiction in the matter.
Classic spin babbling...I never said a thing you speak of, ya lying pos.
 
As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?
Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.
As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.
 

Forum List

Back
Top