Where’s The Evidence?? Are You Kidding??

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

 

[edthecynic]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

You seem really BRAINWASHED, that is if you had a brain to wash!
There are ONLY Nazis involved in Tramp's attempt to steal the election. STOP THE STEAL!!!!!

Do you not know what a NAZI is ?

YOU are a Nazi Fascist in the flesh!

No.

Your no means YES!

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

You seem really BRAINWASHED, that is if you had a brain to wash!
There are ONLY Nazis involved in Tramp's attempt to steal the election. STOP THE STEAL!!!!!

Do you not know what a NAZI is ?

YOU are a Nazi Fascist in the flesh!

No.

Your no means YES!

It does not.

 

[Agit8r]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

 

[BluesLegend]

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Said nobody in the fake news ever.

 

[Skylar]

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Said nobody in the fake news ever.

So if the 'evidence' is so damning, why haven't Trump's lawyers presented it in court?

It would likely become public record at that point anyway.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Public opinion is already with them
Though irrelevant
The courts will decide
The question will be is the scotus ready for 4 more years of leftwing violence if the election is decided fairly?
If not they will wash their hands of it

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Public opinion is already with them
Though irrelevant
The courts will decide
The question will be is the scotus ready for 4 more years of leftwing violence if the election is decided fairly?
If not they will wash their hands of it

You can barely get a majority of Republicans to agree with the prevailing conservative batshit on 'election fraud'.

 

[Moonglow]

Mi

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Miniscule errors is all.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

And what makes them nazis? You just throw that word around so easily. Kinda diminishes the meaning and seriousness of a group that wiped out shitloads of people?

 

[miketx]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

Or....your ilk keep presenting conspiracies as 'facts'.

Given Trump's essentially perfect record of failure in court, with his own lawyers forced to admit that allegations of fraud are not part of their legal argument, that seems more likely than your explanation.

 

[miketx]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

Or....your ilk keep presenting conspiracies as 'facts'.

Given Trump's essentially perfect record of failure in court, with his own lawyers forced to admit that allegations of fraud are not part of their legal argument, that seems more likely than your explanation.

I haven't presented any conspiracies ya lying skank.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

Or....your ilk keep presenting conspiracies as 'facts'.

Given Trump's essentially perfect record of failure in court, with his own lawyers forced to admit that allegations of fraud are not part of their legal argument, that seems more likely than your explanation.

I haven't presented any conspiracies ya lying skank.

Then what 'facts' were presented that we're ignoring?

Remember, your conspiracies aren't 'facts'.
.

 

[miketx]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

Or....your ilk keep presenting conspiracies as 'facts'.

Given Trump's essentially perfect record of failure in court, with his own lawyers forced to admit that allegations of fraud are not part of their legal argument, that seems more likely than your explanation.

I haven't presented any conspiracies ya lying skank.

Then what 'facts' were presented that we're ignoring?

Remember, your conspiracies aren't 'facts'.
.

Yeah, keep repeating the same lies. I've never posted any conspiracies and the only conclusion I can some to is that if you aren't a liar then you're too stupid to understand words.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Public opinion is already with them
Though irrelevant
The courts will decide
The question will be is the scotus ready for 4 more years of leftwing violence if the election is decided fairly?
If not they will wash their hands of it

You can barely get a majority of Republicans to agree with the prevailing conservative batshit on 'election fraud'.

Approximately 3/4 believe that The President won.

 

[Agit8r]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Public opinion is already with them
Though irrelevant
The courts will decide
The question will be is the scotus ready for 4 more years of leftwing violence if the election is decided fairly?
If not they will wash their hands of it

You can barely get a majority of Republicans to agree with the prevailing conservative batshit on 'election fraud'.

Approximately 3/4 believe that The President won.

Source?

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

Or to the public for that matter. Certainly if they had any they would have presented it for the whole world to see. The fact that they haven't proves that they have none to show.

Why would they do that?

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Public opinion is already with them
Though irrelevant
The courts will decide
The question will be is the scotus ready for 4 more years of leftwing violence if the election is decided fairly?
If not they will wash their hands of it

You can barely get a majority of Republicans to agree with the prevailing conservative batshit on 'election fraud'.

Approximately 3/4 believe that The President won.

3/4ths of the people of the room you're in?

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

How about simply taking your evidence to a judge and let them decide on the facts of the matter,

That's how it's done. Not in the Kangaroo court of Faux Ne.......ummmm...ah.....OAN and NewsMaxine.

Its remarkably how different the horseshit Trump is feeding his followers is from the arguments his lawyers are making in court.

As if your lying ass knows anything about it.

Dude, the accusations are endless. The evidence isn't.

That no republican observers were allowed to watch the Pennsylvania vote. (They were).

That there were more ballots cast in Wisconsin than registered voters (there weren't)

That George Soros orchestrated the 'stolen election' (backed by nothing)

That the mob in Philidelphia worked with the Phili election officials to give Biden the election (backed by nothing)

That the Dominion servers were seized by the US military in Germany and show massive fraud (backed by nothing)

That millions of votes were switched for Biden (DHS Cyber Security confirmed that there was no evidence of any vote changes)

That lambos full of Biden votes driving up to poll counting stations (heresay only)

That post masters in Pennsylvania were backmarking late ballots (accuser recanted AND the total number of ballots that could match the accusation.....as 2).

That the 'bedford model' proves voter fraud (the bedford model doesn't demonstrate voter fraud).

That the voting machines had millions of 'extra' biden votes imput into them while the vote counters were out sleeping on election night (backed by nothing).

That upticks in Biden votes in Wisconsin and Michigan prove 'fraud' (they prove only batch reporting)

That a dead man in Georgia was voting 8 years after his death (it was his wife, who is very much alive)

And on, and on, and on. Each factually unsupported. Each your ilk insist are 'facts'.

And of course, each that have failed utterly in court to meet even basic standards of evidence......or were never presented at all by Trump's lawyers.

You've being played.

Dude, I mean *****, I have never mentioned one of those.

And YOU are the only one presenting accusations backed by nothing?

These were all offered to us a 'facts' when they were presented. Just like you are now. How are your claims any different than the rest of your ilk?

Show us the evidence in court.

As your ilk are spewing a veritable batshit tsunami of conspiracy nonsense outside of it.

Jesus you're a lying *****.

Or....your ilk keep presenting conspiracies as 'facts'.

Given Trump's essentially perfect record of failure in court, with his own lawyers forced to admit that allegations of fraud are not part of their legal argument, that seems more likely than your explanation.

I haven't presented any conspiracies ya lying skank.

Then what 'facts' were presented that we're ignoring?

Remember, your conspiracies aren't 'facts'.
.

Yeah, keep repeating the same lies. I've never posted any conspiracies and the only conclusion I can some to is that if you aren't a liar then you're too stupid to understand words.

That's not an answer to my question. What 'facts were presented that we're ignoring?

And if these 'facts' are so compelling, so devastating, so utterly game changing.....why haven't Trump's lawyers presented them in court?

 

[BluesLegend]

Because presenting the evidence is how you sway public opinion.

Said nobody in the fake news ever.

So if the 'evidence' is so damning, why haven't Trump's lawyers presented it in court?

It would likely become public record at that point anyway.

Look I know you are reasonably intelligent from your posts so please stop asking this faux ignorant question. You know full well the attorneys are not going to present their evidence to the court until they are ready and they certainly are not going to release their evidence to the public before presenting their case to the court.