Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Impersonating an officer is a crime.

So is voting as an illegal. Sauce for the goose.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

How? What are they going to do? They can't go into the polling location because thats private property, and they need the joy of a warrant.
Do you even know?

The irony in that statement is overpowering. The fact that is a polling location makes it public! Are you and White6 having a contest to out stupid one another?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No, they can be denied.

Yes, schools can generally deny police entrance without a judicial warrant. Under the Fourth Amendment, school officials can act as gatekeepers, requiring law enforcement to present a warrant based on probable cause to enter or search the premises, though they may allow entry during emergencies (exigent circumstances) or with consent. [1, 2, 3]


Key Aspects of School and Police Access:

• Warrant Requirements: Police usually need a search warrant for school grounds, similar to private property, ensuring the search is authorized by a judge.
• Exceptions to Warrants: Police may enter without a warrant if they have consent from school officials or if there are "exigent circumstances," such as an immediate threat to safety or a need to prevent destruction of evidence.
• ICE/Federal Agents: Schools can refuse entry to immigration officials (ICE) who do not possess a judicial warrant. Administrative warrants, commonly used by immigration officers, do not compel entry.
• School Official Searches: Unlike police, school administrators do not need a warrant to search a student. They only require "reasonable suspicion" to conduct a search.
• School Property: Law enforcement may be denied access to private school areas, but school staff can generally search school-owned property (like lockers) and consent to police looking at those areas. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Disclaimer: Laws can vary by state and specific circumstances.

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses
[1] https://www.naesp.org/blog/ice-on-campus-understanding-different-types-of-warrants-in-school-settings/
[2] Schools must protect students –and follow the law– if ICE shows up - ACLU of Pennsylvania
[3] Warrantless search and seizure | Texas District & County Attorneys Association
[4] https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does-fourth-amendment-mean
[5] https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article299312234.html
[6] School Searches and Seizure | Kids Legal
[7] https://www.publiccounsel.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/school-search-and-seizure.pdf

I highlighted your error.

 

[Rambunctious]

Impersonating an officer is a crime.

Next time I tell a funny... I will run it past you first....

 

[Zincwarrior]

Next time I tell a funny... I will run it past you first....

Thats prudent.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Incorrect. .000425 is correct, but that would be .0425%.

This math lesson provided as a public service.

Thanks!

 

[White 6]

re DEmocrats

Voter ID is a sledgehammer? WTF?

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

 

[Lockback]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

 

[mudwhistle]

What are the numbers regarding people that have been arrested based on their color despite providing ID? That’s a specious claim on your part to be making without any data to back it up.

How come Democrats aren’t putting priority and premium on ICE showing up at places of business, worship, or schools? Democrats are most worried about ICE showing up at a one-day event, Election Day.

It's clear they're using illegals to swing elections.

 

[mudwhistle]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

Typical lib response. No evidence.

There's a ton of evidence but none you'd ever believe.

 

[White 6]

Well, if you disagree, simply show me the study showing the arrests, or covictions in numbers large enough in even one county in the whole country to have changed the outcome of a single federal election, in the 250 year history. You can't. It does not exist. It never happened. It never even came close. It is nothing but a talking point by losers that still cannot get over losing the 2020 elect (which they most definitely did lose) and now the Idiot-N-Cheif want this done, so the kiss ass Republican want to get it done to make him feel better. But, that won't work either, because he simply lost, as people were fresh off seeing his performance the first time around and did not want anymore. That is pretty much the story now, also, but unless impeached, we got the dickhead until after the election in 2028.

I have multiple Federal ID's personally. I really don't give a rats ass. I just know it is the least important thing to go through congress, before the Republicans are voted out of legislative power, and we get to watch the Dem screw around, instead.

 

[White 6]

Typical lib response. No evidence.

There's a ton of evidence but none you'd ever believe.

View attachment 1232853

Post it if you got it. Kiss my ass, if you don't.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

How do you know there isn't a significant problem, dumbass? People can vote in states like California by walking in and stating a name! Doesn't even have to be theirs as no ID required. How do you detect fraud if you have no means to check?

I swear you are getting dumber by the minute. Please resign as a mod, so most of us can ignore your pathetic conduct.

 

[Mick2]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

"state problem"

Joe Biden and Dems disagreed when the sued the state of Georgia for enacting their own state voting laws....

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/justice-department-files-lawsuit-against-state-georgia-stop-racially-discriminatory

The fact is you guys fight election integrity laws tooth and nail. State versus federal has nothing to do with it. Don't be a fake.

 

[White 6]

How do you know there isn't a significant problem, dumbass? People can vote in states like California by walking in and stating a name! Doesn't even have to be theirs as no ID required. How do you detect fraud if you have no means to check?

I swear you are getting dumber by the minute. Please resign as a mod, so most of us can ignore your pathetic conduct.

No. They can walk in and get a provisional ballot, that is scrutinized by people from both parties, and there simply is no record of California have an illegal alien voting problem.

You can ignore my response in board forums now. Hell, I invite idiot like you to simply skip them. You never have anything verifiable or even linked to facts, anyway.

 

[scruffy]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

That ^^^, sir, is more than enough evidence. The chances of this happening in a fair election are less than one in a million.

The Democrats cheated. Big time. In at least 5 different states, and probably more.

Gee, NO WONDER THEY DON'T WANT VOTER ID.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No. They can walk in and get a provisional ballot, that is scrutinized by people from both parties, and there simply is no record of California have an illegal alien voting problem.

You can ignore my response in board forums now. Hell, I invite idiot like you to simply skip them. You never have anything verifiable or even linked to facts, anyway.

What is wrong with your brain? No record means they haven't found any. You honestly think Democrat controlled California is actually looking for illegals who have voted? That is cutting your nose off to spite your face, dumbass!

Facts are something you should really look into, since most of yours are lies.

You cannot fulfill your duties as a mod due to your rampant TDS. I asked you to resign, so you won't be fired. However, if you won't, I think it is almost time to petition the other mods to have you removed since you are obviously incapable of doing your job.

 

[Nostra]

No, there has been no proof of 315,000 illegal votes in any Georgia county during any election. Claims of widespread fraud have been repeatedly debunked, and audits have shown that noncitizen voting is extremely rare.
abcnews.com AOL

Did Fulton county georgia unsigned tapes help trump wi...

Executive summary The unsigned Fulton County tabulator tapes were a paperwork and chain-of-custody problem admitted by county officials; they are not evi...

factually.co

Hey stupid,the GA State Elections Board is saying they found 315,000 illegal votes in one county.

Fulton County elections officials admits 315,000 votes weren’t signed by poll workers

Fulton County says it'll cost $400,000 to give the state the documents they want.

www.wsbtv.com

 

[Nostra]

Never buy a new sledge hammer for use once a year to swat a fly

How do you propose we swat that fly?

 

[Nostra]

For a problem (that is a state problem, not a federal responsibility) a bill going through Two houses congress, is a sledge hammer, especially when there is no evidence there even is a significant problem.

How many Americans being disenfranchised by illegal votes or you OK with White 6

At what point does it become a problem?