Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

you mean you want to avoid the issue of the origin of the universe and the origin of life
Which is what evolution is not about.

Exactly. eots, if you want to discuss the origin or life or the creation of the universe, may I suggest you start threads on those topics?
Sure and can start your intelligent design conspiracy thread

You guys have done that for me right here, but thanks for the suggestion. :itsok:
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
 
I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.
If christianity is a fact how come only 32% of the world buys it?
More deflection? Seriously? BWAHAHAHA! !!
That's a serious question. How do you explain all the Jews athiests Hindu and Buddhists if the new testament was factual or believable? Explain
Once again. This thread is about evidence for evolution. Religion is not up for discusion. If you want to do that, start your own thread. Now. Do you have any evidence that supports the theory of evolution?
Watch the new Cosmos series with Neil Degrasse Tyson. He explains.

But I'm sure you wouldn't believe any of the evidence he presents because you are a flat earther.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention

Translation: na na nana na.

see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no-evil-2.jpg
 
How do you know it happens over hundreds of thousands of years if not millions.
antibiotic resistant microorganisms did not develop over millions of years and they are not evidence of evolution
Antibiotic resistant microorganisms did not need to develop over millions of years and such evolving of organisms certainly is evidence of evolution.

You and the other science illiterate religious extremists are really ill equipped to critique the biological sciences when you don't understand even the most basic of topics and have no science vocabulary.
you seem confused ..you say evolution takes millions of years ..then you say it does not..so what new species did these Antibiotic resistant organisms evolve into ?
You don't seem confused, you announce your befuddlement. It must be by magical means or supernatural intervention that organisms evolve resistance to antibiotics.

Let us know if you ever emerge from your stupor.
you can not even answer without the use of a strawman ,I am not a "fundie" and have no belief in magic
Then explain how all the diverse life got on this planet without evolution. What is your theory?
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
They said why rule out aliens if your gonna believe it must have been a god. Not that they believe in aliens.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
They said why rule out aliens if your gonna believe it must have been a god. Not that they believe in aliens.
You know what? The only reason I haven't ignored you yet, is because your stupidity makes me laugh out loud. It really does. Keep up the good work.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
They said why rule out aliens if your gonna believe it must have been a god. Not that they believe in aliens.
You know what? The only reason I haven't ignored you yet, is because your stupidity makes me laugh out loud. It really does. Keep up the good work.
Whenever you are ready get froggy and numb bitch!
 
and Intelligent design is not some conspiracy of fundamentalist religion it is something that looks upon all of creation as one phenomenon that is intelligent and purposeful...God can be a word to describe that and not an entity with magical powers
I don't know, an entity with magical powers seems a good description of an intelligence that can create galaxies.
why ?..the universe ..god could express it self trough principles that are real , knowable, measurable at least to the degree a finite human mind is capable of
 
and Intelligent design is not some conspiracy of fundamentalist religion it is something that looks upon all of creation as one phenomenon that is intelligent and purposeful...God can be a word to describe that and not an entity with magical powers
I don't know, an entity with magical powers seems a good description of an intelligence that can create galaxies.
why ?..the universe ..god could express it self trough principles that are real , knowable, measurable at least to the degree a finite human mind is capable of
Magical thinking.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
They said why rule out aliens if your gonna believe it must have been a god. Not that they believe in aliens.
You know what? The only reason I haven't ignored you yet, is because your stupidity makes me laugh out loud. It really does. Keep up the good work.
Whenever you are ready get froggy and numb bitch!
Oh wow! The Wittle wiberal is acting all tough. How cute.
and Intelligent design is not some conspiracy of fundamentalist religion it is something that looks upon all of creation as one phenomenon that is intelligent and purposeful...God can be a word to describe that and not an entity with magical powers
I don't know, an entity with magical powers seems a good description of an intelligence that can create galaxies.
why ?..the universe ..god could express it self trough principles that are real , knowable, measurable at least to the degree a finite human mind is capable of
Magical thinking.
Believing that you were capable of independent thought would be magical thinking on my part.
 
why ?..the universe ..god could express it self trough principles that are real , knowable, measurable at least to the degree a finite human mind is capable of
What is not knowable or measurable is magical.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
You're free to deny the overwhelming evidence for biological evolution. That's a common trait among religious extremists and goofy conspiracy theorists. You and those like you are just at odds with the facts. That's another common trait of religious extremists and goofy conspiracy theorists.

The anti-science, anti-knowledge agenda of you zealots is a wonder to behold.
 
and Intelligent design is not some conspiracy of fundamentalist religion it is something that looks upon all of creation as one phenomenon that is intelligent and purposeful...God can be a word to describe that and not an entity with magical powers
I don't know, an entity with magical powers seems a good description of an intelligence that can create galaxies.
why ?..the universe ..god could express it self trough principles that are real , knowable, measurable at least to the degree a finite human mind is capable of
Eyup. And the space aliens will be landing tomorrow.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the thread query "where is the mountain of evidence for evolution" is nothing more than a burqa covering the goal of the fundamentalist to denigrate science?
No but I did notice however that no definitive evidence was offered and that people like dawkins and stephen hawking went as far as to suggest alien intervention
They said why rule out aliens if your gonna believe it must have been a god. Not that they believe in aliens.
You know what? The only reason I haven't ignored you yet, is because your stupidity makes me laugh out loud. It really does. Keep up the good work.
I can understand you're angry and frustrated. The question regarding evidence for evolution is demonstrated overwhelmingly by the science community. You deny it because biological history directly contradicts your YEC'ist fantasies and literal interpretation of the various bibles. It's unfortunate for you because you are the stereotype of the raving, hair-on-fire, out of control thumper, the Taliban who is marginalized by a society that keeps you on a choke collar.
 
Actually, I haven't even tried. I was simply pointing out that what you accuse evolutionists of, creationists always do.

I can show a LOT of evidence of evolution. I can link to descendants of modern animals, I can link to current examples of evolution we see today. Antibiotic resistant microorganisms for one example, viral evolution is another.
And still you have no evidence to back any of it up. It's all unproven. There is not one single fact that you point to. It's nothing but speculation and wishful thinking. Get over it.

I already provided the proof. I sited antibiotic resistant microorganisms as an example of evolution, which it is. What's the problem? Can you not read?
so what new species did your bacteria become ?

Which one? There are many.
When has any Antibiotic resistant microorganisms been observed becoming another species

Another species? Never. But that is irrelevant isn't it.
 
I already provided the proof. I sited antibiotic resistant microorganisms as an example of evolution, which it is. What's the problem? Can you not read?
so what new species did your bacteria become ?

Which one? There are many.
When has any Antibiotic resistant microorganisms been observed becoming another species

Antibiotic resistance

Antibiotic resistance is the ability of a microorganism to withstand the effects of an antibiotic.

It is a specific type of drug resistance.

Antibiotic resistance evolves naturally via natural selection through random mutation, but it could also be engineered by applying an evolutionary stress on a population.

Once such a gene is generated, bacteria can then transfer the genetic information in a horizontal fashion (between individuals) by plasmid exchange.

If a bacterium carries several resistance genes, it is called multiresistant or, informally, a superbug.

Causes Antibiotic resistance can also be introduced artificially into a microorganism through transformation protocols.

This can be a useful way of implanting artificial genes into the microorganism.

Antibiotic resistance is a consequence of evolution via natural selection.

The antibiotic action is an environmental pressure; those bacteria which have a mutation allowing them to survive will live on to reproduce.

They will then pass this trait to their offspring, which will be a fully resistant generation.

Several studies have demonstrated that patterns of antibiotic usage greatly affect the number of resistant organisms which develop.

Overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as second- and third-generation cephalosporins, greatly hastens the development of methicillin resistance.

Other factors contributing towards resistance include incorrect diagnosis, unnecessary prescriptions, improper use of antibiotics by patients, and the use of antibiotics as livestock food additives for growth promotion.

Researchers have recently demonstrated the bacterial protein LexA may play a key role in the acquisition of bacterial mutations.

Resistant pathogens Staphylococcus aureus (colloquially known as "Staph aureus" or a Staph infection) is one of the major resistant pathogens.

Found on the mucous membranes and the skin of around a third of the population, it is extremely adaptable to antibiotic pressure.

It was the first bacterium in which penicillin resistance was found—in 1947, just four years after the drug started being mass-produced.

Methicillin was then the antibiotic of choice, but has since been replaced by oxacillin due to significant kidney toxicity.

MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) was first detected in Britain in 1961 and is now "quite common" in hospitals.

MRSA was responsible for 37% of fatal cases of blood poisoning in the UK in 1999, up from 4% in 1991.

Half of all S. aureus infections in the US are resistant to penicillin, methicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin.

This left vancomycin as the only effective agent available at the time.

However, strains with intermediate (4-8 ug/ml) levels of resistence, termed GISA (glycopeptide intermediate Staphylococcus aureus) or VISA (vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus), began appearing the the late 1990s.

The first identified case was in Japan in 1996, and strains have since been found in hospitals in England, France and the US.

The first documented strain with complete (>16ug/ml) resistence to vancomycin, termed VRSA (Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) appeared in the United States in 2002.

A new class of antibiotics, oxazolidinones, became available in the 1990s, and the first commercially available oxazolidinone, linezolid, is comparable to vancomycin in effectiveness against MRSA.

Linezolid-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus was reported in 2003.

CA-MRSA (Community-acquired MRSA) has now emerged as an epidemic that is responsible for rapidly progressive, fatal diseases including necrotizing pneumonia, severe sepsis and necrotizing fasciitis.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most frequently identified antimicrobial drug-resistant pathogen in US hospitals.

The epidemiology of infections caused by MRSA is rapidly changing.

In the past 10 years, infections caused by this organism have emerged in the community.

The 2 MRSA clones in the United States most closely associated with community outbreaks, USA400 (MW2 strain, ST1 lineage) and USA300, often contain Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes and, more frequently, have been associated with skin and soft tissue infections.

Outbreaks of community-associated (CA)-MRSA infections have been reported in correctional facilities, among athletic teams, among military recruits, in newborn nurseries, and among active homosexual men.

CA-MRSA infections now appear to be endemic in many urban regions and cause most CA-S. aureus infections.

Enterococcus faecium is another superbug found in hospitals.

Penicillin-Resistant Enterococcus was seen in 1983, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in 1987, and Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus (LRE) in the late 1990s.

Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus: GAS) infections can usually be treated with many different antibiotics.

Early treatment may reduce the risk of death from invasive group A streptococcal disease.

However, even the best medical care does not prevent death in every case.

For those with very severe illness, supportive care in an intensive care unit may be needed.

For persons with necrotizing fasciitis, surgery often is needed to remove damaged tissue.

Strains of S. pyogenes resistant to macrolide antibiotics have emerged, however all strains remain uniformly sensitive to penicillin.

Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin and other beta-lactams is increasing worldwide.

The major mechanism of resistance involves the introduction of mutations in genes encoding penicillin-binding proteins.

Selective pressure is thought to play an important role, and use of beta-lactam antibiotics has been implicated as a risk factor for infection and colonization.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for pneumonia, bacteremia, otitis media, meningitis, sinusitis, peritonitis and arthritis.
so the short answer is never..the bacteria remains a bacteria

Brilliant. But irrelevant.
 
Back
Top Bottom