Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[S.J.]

I will provide you will an explanation that someone at your level of education (or lack thereof) should be able to grasp:

Evolution Frequently Asked Questions

1. How can one species "turn into" another?

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population. In order for one population to diverge enough from another to become a new species, there needs to be something to keep the populations from mixing. Often a physical boundary divides the species into two (or more) populations and keeps them from interbreeding. If separated for long enough and presented with sufficiently varied environmental conditions, each population takes its own distinct evolutionary path. Sometimes the division between the populations is never breached, and reproductive isolation remains intact purely for geographical reasons. It is possible, though, if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try.

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

You hit the nail on the head. Evolution requires more faith than creationism.

 

[orogenicman]

I will provide you will an explanation that someone at your level of education (or lack thereof) should be able to grasp:

Evolution Frequently Asked Questions

1. How can one species "turn into" another?

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population. In order for one population to diverge enough from another to become a new species, there needs to be something to keep the populations from mixing. Often a physical boundary divides the species into two (or more) populations and keeps them from interbreeding. If separated for long enough and presented with sufficiently varied environmental conditions, each population takes its own distinct evolutionary path. Sometimes the division between the populations is never breached, and reproductive isolation remains intact purely for geographical reasons. It is possible, though, if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try.

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real?

 

[orogenicman]

The FACT that Evolution occurs is supported by biological, fossil, geologic and recently......DNA evidence

God is just a theory......A theory unsupported by scientific evidence

No it isn't. That's just your leap. Show us proof that one species became another.

I will provide you will an explanation that someone at your level of education (or lack thereof) should be able to grasp:

Evolution Frequently Asked Questions

1. How can one species "turn into" another?

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population. In order for one population to diverge enough from another to become a new species, there needs to be something to keep the populations from mixing. Often a physical boundary divides the species into two (or more) populations and keeps them from interbreeding. If separated for long enough and presented with sufficiently varied environmental conditions, each population takes its own distinct evolutionary path. Sometimes the division between the populations is never breached, and reproductive isolation remains intact purely for geographical reasons. It is possible, though, if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try.

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

Translation: I don't have any proof but you should believe me anyway because I'm so smart.

Repeating a fallacy is not helping your argument.

 

[orogenicman]

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

You hit the nail on the head. Evolution requires more faith than creationism.

That's the funniest accusation I've heard coming from a creationist in years. You should take that joke to Vegas. I'm sure you will get lots of laughs.

 

[eots]

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny an intelligent and infinite universe

 

[eots]

 

[orogenicman]

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

 

[eots]

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

 

[S.J.]

No it isn't. That's just your leap. Show us proof that one species became another.

I will provide you will an explanation that someone at your level of education (or lack thereof) should be able to grasp:

Evolution Frequently Asked Questions

1. How can one species "turn into" another?

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population. In order for one population to diverge enough from another to become a new species, there needs to be something to keep the populations from mixing. Often a physical boundary divides the species into two (or more) populations and keeps them from interbreeding. If separated for long enough and presented with sufficiently varied environmental conditions, each population takes its own distinct evolutionary path. Sometimes the division between the populations is never breached, and reproductive isolation remains intact purely for geographical reasons. It is possible, though, if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try.

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

Translation: I don't have any proof but you should believe me anyway because I'm so smart.

Repeating a fallacy is not helping your argument.

You should take your own advice. You haven't provided one bit of proof yet.

 

[S.J.]

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

You hit the nail on the head. Evolution requires more faith than creationism.

That's the funniest accusation I've heard coming from a creationist in years. You should take that joke to Vegas. I'm sure you will get lots of laughs.

Still waiting for your proof.

 

[S.J.]

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real?

Sure you are.

 

[orogenicman]

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

This is where I am supposed to apologize for who I am and on what I have spent my life working. That you decided to waste your life evangelizing instead of learning something about nature is on you, not me.

 

[orogenicman]

I will provide you will an explanation that someone at your level of education (or lack thereof) should be able to grasp:

Evolution Frequently Asked Questions

1. How can one species "turn into" another?

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population. In order for one population to diverge enough from another to become a new species, there needs to be something to keep the populations from mixing. Often a physical boundary divides the species into two (or more) populations and keeps them from interbreeding. If separated for long enough and presented with sufficiently varied environmental conditions, each population takes its own distinct evolutionary path. Sometimes the division between the populations is never breached, and reproductive isolation remains intact purely for geographical reasons. It is possible, though, if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try.

I asked for proof, not speculation. Can't you follow simple instructions, moron?

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

Translation: I don't have any proof but you should believe me anyway because I'm so smart.

Repeating a fallacy is not helping your argument.

You should take your own advice. You haven't provided one bit of proof yet.

And I won't either, because science is not about proof. That I have to keep telling you this simple fact tells me that you aren't very smart. You have my deepest sympathy.

 

[orogenicman]

First of all, science is not about proof. Mathematics is about proof. Science is about verifiable, repeatable evidence. You can't get past 5th grade science, and yet you call me a moron? That's very funny.

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real?

Sure you are.

CRINOIDS FROM THE MULDRAUGH MEMBER OF THE BORDEN FORMATION IN NORTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY ECHINODERMATA LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN

 

[Mr.Right]

And yet evolution has no verifiable, repeatable evidence. That should tell you something right there. Assuming you had a functioning brain, that is.

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

You hit the nail on the head. Evolution requires more faith than creationism.

That's the funniest accusation I've heard coming from a creationist in years. You should take that joke to Vegas. I'm sure you will get lots of laughs.

Still waiting for your proof.

you might want to find a way to kill some time. It may be a while.

 

[eots]

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

This is where I am supposed to apologize for who I am and on what I have spent my life working. That you decided to waste your life evangelizing instead of learning something about nature is on you, not me.

No need to apologize just keep it in perspective..

 

[orogenicman]

I am a geologist, so why would I accept the lie that evolution is not real? What qualifications do you have to tell anyone that evolution is not real

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

This is where I am supposed to apologize for who I am and on what I have spent my life working. That you decided to waste your life evangelizing instead of learning something about nature is on you, not me.

No need to apologize just keep it in perspective..

From my perspective, you have no real training in, experience, or understanding of science. And yet you think you can play at the adult table when it comes to scientific issues. Either get a real education or let the educated adults have these discussions because, frankly, I don't care whether or not you actually understand any of the evidence I've posted here.

 

[S.J.]

What evidence for evolution do you believe is not verifiable, or repeatable. Be specific.

well you seem refuse to accept there is no evidence or observation of one species transition to another and try to explain it away with a story that could rival that of noah and seems to require faith

You hit the nail on the head. Evolution requires more faith than creationism.

That's the funniest accusation I've heard coming from a creationist in years. You should take that joke to Vegas. I'm sure you will get lots of laughs.

Still waiting for your proof.

you might want to find a way to kill some time. It may be a while.

Oh, I'm not holding my breath. This guy has delusions of grandeur.

 

[eots]

Appeal to authority ? What qualifications do you have does a butterfly have to navigate a flight of thousands of miles..what qualifications does a geologist have to deny
an intelligent and infinite universe

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

This is where I am supposed to apologize for who I am and on what I have spent my life working. That you decided to waste your life evangelizing instead of learning something about nature is on you, not me.

No need to apologize just keep it in perspective..

From my perspective, you have no real training in, experience, or understanding of science. And yet you think you can play at the adult table when it comes to scientific issues. Either get a real education or let the educated adults have these discussions because, frankly, I don't care whether or not you actually understand any of the evidence I've posted here.

yes I see you invested many years in taking information and regurgitating it and I am not impressed, the world is full of buffoons with degrees. perhaps it is my lack of such indoctrination that allows me to see that..

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population...blah blah blah etc etc etc...
if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try....

Is speculation and reads like a cheap novel

 

[Mr.Right]

There are no authorities in science, only experts. I have 26 years of field expertize in geology, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. I am also a longtime amateur astronomer. What science expertize do you have? Any at all? Of course, you don't have any. All you have is your faith, and we all know that faith is a belief in something not in evidence.

I see, so ego and self value are all warped in your.. belief

This is where I am supposed to apologize for who I am and on what I have spent my life working. That you decided to waste your life evangelizing instead of learning something about nature is on you, not me.

No need to apologize just keep it in perspective..

From my perspective, you have no real training in, experience, or understanding of science. And yet you think you can play at the adult table when it comes to scientific issues. Either get a real education or let the educated adults have these discussions because, frankly, I don't care whether or not you actually understand any of the evidence I've posted here.

yes I see you invested many years in taking information and regurgitating it and I am not impressed the world is full of buffoons with degrees. perhaps it my lack of such indoctrination that allows me to see that..

One species does not "turn into" another or several other species -- not in an instant, anyway. The evolutionary process of speciation is how one population of a species changes over time to the point where that population is distinct and can no longer interbreed with the "parent" population...blah blah blah etc etc etc...
if the populations have been separate for long enough, that even if brought back together and given the opportunity to interbreed they won't, or they won't be successful if they try....
Is speculation and reads like a cheap novel

Ever notice how often evolutionists use words like maybe, could have and probably?