Zone1 Where do you personally Stand on abortion laws.

[Monk-Eye]

" Federal Power Red Herring For Traitors Against Independence Of The Individual Citizen "

* Not Ancient History Rather Intelligence Is Required For Conviction *

And as much as the Democrats claim to want to re-institute Roe v Wade, they are lying through their figurative teeth. They would not be satisfied with that policy. They want it much more open than that. Furthermore, a law that sought to reinstitute Roe v Wade would be unconstitutional. The Federal government has no power to regulate abortion. It ain't in the Constitution, and the Tenth Amendment still is. This is not ancient history folks; everyone reading this was alive and literate at the time of the Dobbs decision.

The roe v wade decision had nothing to do with federal government regulation of abortion , as scotus determined that not the federal government and not the state government but the individual citizen is responsible for regulating themselves .

Any citizen has legal standing that state proscription of abortion violates equal protection clause , it is not ancient history and just as any other despot that would suspend us constitution , scotus judges which voted in favor of dobbs decision should be formally charged with sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , as well as malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code .

It is amazing that the value of us 9th amendment and profound implications of NON ENUMERATED RITES is ignored .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Vanity Of The Goads "

* Canines With Carnal Knowledge In Apex Predator Hue Mammon Apes *

It doesn't make the fetus any less human, though.

Forget the anthropocentric psychosis , the literal meaning of an after is genetic continuance and rewarding a rapist with an after life is demented .

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Limited Abilities Of The General Public To Rationalize Clearly "

* Ignorance Of States Determining It Means You Are Making It Your Business *

My stance is, it’s none of my business and it’s not of the governments business either. Let the people of the states handle it.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Some Missed The Point "

* Comic Relief *

One thing will solve the whole problem. If every last woman in the nation avoids getting pregnant, it all goes away.

One should clearly presume that is a mockery of abortion anti-choice because extinction of the hue mammon species would result .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Simpleton Adherence With Ignoring Developmental Anomalies And Value Of Citizenship "

* Putrid Ideologies Traitorous Against Us Republic Constitution *

Just the doctors who would illegally perform them. Strip their license and put them in prison if past 6 weeks

It would be better for purveyors of such stupidity as you propose to be stripped of us citizenship and deported elsewhere to live in terrorist nations around the world that agree with them .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Raving About Mortality As If An Immortal Could Care Or Understand It "

* Hails For Reverence To Preserve Hue Mammon Life Gone Off The Rails *

You should add ban at conception with life of the mother exception.

One would be better advised to make sure the priests stay in the temple where they belong .

A subjective altruism of hue mammon apes is that its introspection should exist in perpetuity , however nature does not require that ever instance of hue mammon apes exists in perpetuity to satisfy the subjective altruism .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Limited Abilities Of The General Public To Rationalize Clearly "

* Ignorance Of States Determining It Means You Are Making It Your Business *

No, I stand by what I said. The cotus makes no provision for the federal government to rule on this. But it does have a 10th amendment, that’s where my opinion rests.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual Citizen "

* Federal Red Herring For Traitorous Acts In Support Of Formal Sedition *

No, I stand by what I said. The cotus makes no provision for the federal government to rule on this. But it does have a 10th amendment, that’s where my opinion rests.

A state is comprised of citizens , whether one is a citizen of the us federate or a citizen of a us state , and there is only one non incidental requirement to become a citizen of either and that is live birth .

A legitimate interest of federal and state governments is first and foremost bound with citizenship of its individual citizens that is instantiated through a live birth requirement , where by equitable doctrine live birth is required for equal protection with a us citizen .

Abortion is a NON ENUMERATED rite , even as us 9th amendment precedes us 10th amendment in order of occurrence , and a legitimate interest of federal and state governments is prohibited from proscribing abortion without a live birth requirement , else its actions are in violation of the equal protection clause in us constitution .

A contention that abortion is not enumerated in us federal constitution , and therefore states are entitled to determine public policy about it , is a red herring ruse to deprive individual citizens of their entitlement to equal protection under us constitution , by conferring constitutional protections upon any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive them .

The pure reason of a live birth requirement in us constitution as a delimiter of legitimate federal or state interests is not ambiguous or controvertible , and it clearly explains the " logically , of course " statement and conclusions of blackmum whom wrote the majority opinion of roe v wade , yet the abortion anti-choice chose a path of traitorous acts and sedition .

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

.

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual Citizen "

* Federal Red Herring For Traitorous Acts In Support Of Formal Sedition *

A state is comprised of citizens , whether one is a citizen of the us federate or a citizen of a us state , and there is only one non incidental requirement to become a citizen of either and that is live birth .

A legitimate interest of federal and state governments is first and foremost bound with citizenship of its individual citizens that is instantiated through a live birth requirement , where by equitable doctrine live birth is required for equal protection with a us citizen .

Abortion is a NON ENUMERATED rite , even as us 9th amendment precedes us 10th amendment in order of occurrence , and a legitimate interest of federal and state governments is prohibited from proscribing abortion without a live birth requirement , else its actions are in violation of the equal protection clause in us constitution .

A contention that abortion is not enumerated in us federal constitution , and therefore states are entitled to determine public policy about it , is a red herring ruse to deprive individual citizens of their entitlement to equal protection under us constitution , by conferring constitutional protections upon any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive them .

The pure reason of a live birth requirement in us constitution as a delimiter of legitimate federal or state interests is not ambiguous or controvertible , and it clearly explains the " logically , of course " statement and conclusions of blackmum whom wrote the majority opinion of roe v wade , yet the abortion anti-choice chose a path of traitorous acts and sedition .

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

.

It’s not a right enumerate or not. Cotus says federal government can do 18 specific things, the rest is left to the states and people.

I mean, if you are going to go down that road, then we could say any number of things are non enumerated rights and thus guaranteed by the cotus.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Non Enumerated Because A Legitimate State Or Federal Interest Does Not Exist "

* Traitors Support Sedition Against Us Republic And Revile Us Citizenship And Autonomy Of Us Citizens *

It’s not a right enumerate or not. Cotus says federal government can do 18 specific things, the rest is left to the states and people.
I mean, if you are going to go down that road, then we could say any number of things are non enumerated rights and thus guaranteed by the cotus.

The constitution of the united states specifies that live birth is required to be a citizen and equal protection requires live birth - logically , of course - and there is not a legitimate state or federal interest in protecting a rite to life of a zygote , embryo or fetus that has not met a live birth to receive it .

The dobbs decision is dumbfounded and sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and just as any despot that suspends us constitution the collaborators should be charged with the crime .

On the issue of abortion , one either one reveres us citizenship and autonomy of us citizens or they revile them and it is apparent that abortion anti-choice are traitors against us constitution and principles of us republic and that they revile us citizenship and autonomy of us citizens .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Non Enumerated Because A Legitimate State Or Federal Interest Does Not Exist "

* Traitors Support Sedition Against Us Republic And Revile Us Citizenship And Autonomy Of Us Citizens *

The constitution of the united states specifies that live birth is required to be a citizen and equal protection requires live birth - logically , of course - and there is not a legitimate state or federal interest in protecting a rite to life of a zygote , embryo or fetus that has not met a live birth to receive it .

The dobbs decision is dumbfounded and sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and just as any despot that suspends us constitution the collaborators should be charged with the crime .

On the issue of abortion , one either one reveres us citizenship and autonomy of us citizens or they revile them and it is apparent that abortion anti-choice are traitors against us constitution and principles of us republic and that they revile us citizenship and autonomy of us citizens .

I’m not even concerned with what makes a person a citizen, I’m concerned about the powers that are delegated to the federal government , and what limits are put on the same.

Abortion is not an authority granted to the government in the 10th amendment so it’s regulation falls to the states.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Not An Authority Granted To Either Federal Or State Government Rather To Individual Citizens "

* Regulation Of Safety And Security For Citizens *

I’m not even concerned with what makes a person a citizen, I’m concerned about the powers that are delegated to the federal government , and what limits are put on the same.
Abortion is not an authority granted to the government in the 10th amendment so it’s regulation falls to the states.

Neither the federal government nor state government has powers or authority to proscribe abortion , as either would be violating the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment that is contingent on a live birth to become a us citizen and for legitimate interests .

A red herring lie is that the federal government is over riding us constitution because the judiciary determined ( roe v wade ) that individual us citizens maintain a non enumerated rite to abortion , which is based on a live birth requirement to become a us citizen and therefore a live birth is required for equal protection , such that legitimate federal and state interests in protecting a rite to life of of a zygote , embryo or fetus DO NOT EXIST .

States are entitled to regulate abortion to ensure that the procedures are safe and secure for individual us citizens and nothing more .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Not An Authority Granted To Either Federal Or State Government Rather To Individual Citizens "

* Regulation Of Safety And Security For Citizens *

Neither the federal government nor state government has powers or authority to proscribe abortion , as either would be violating the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment that is contingent on a live birth to become a us citizen and for legitimate interests .

A red herring lie is that the federal government is over riding us constitution because the judiciary determined ( roe v wade ) that individual us citizens maintain a non enumerated rite to abortion , which is based on a live birth requirement to become a us citizen and therefore a live birth is required for equal protection , such that legitimate federal and state interests in protecting a rite to life of of a zygote , embryo or fetus DO NOT EXIST .

States are entitled to regulate abortion to ensure that the procedures are safe and secure for individual us citizens and nothing more .

I’m not sure why you keep going back to the definition of life. My point doesn’t even go that far. Is regulating abortion a power of the federal government? Well, we look to the cotus. It’s not there, so it resides with the states.

You’re talking about equal protection, I’m saying that the federal government doesn’t have the right to make any laws regarding abortion.

See, this is the problem that roe created, along with the ever expanding power creep of the federal government. We let it get so big that now people believe it has the power to do anything it wants.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Continuation Of Banter For Abortion Anti-Choice Lies "

* Reductio Ab Absurdum Means No Authority To Proscribe Abortion Else Violate A Live Birth Requirement Of Citizens And Their Equal Protection *

I’m not sure why you keep going back to the definition of life. My point doesn’t even go that far. Is regulating abortion a power of the federal government? Well, we look to the cotus. It’s not there, so it resides with the states.

You mean to state that the rite to abortion is not enumerated , not that abortion is not a non enumerated rite , and states can be prohibited from proscribing an act that is a non enumerated rite , else you are denying altogether that there is such a thing as a non enumerated rite , which means that you are denying the 9th amendment exists at all .

The reason abortion is a non enumerated rite and that states are prohibited from proscribing abortion is that neither the federal government nor state governments have a legitimate interest in protecting a rite to life of anything that has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , and that is because a live birth is the only non incidental requirement for becoming either a citizen of us federate or a citizen of us a us state .

* Abortion Anti-Choice Lying Through Traitorous Teeth In Support Of Sedition *

You’re talking about equal protection, I’m saying that the federal government doesn’t have the right to make any laws regarding abortion.

The authority of us federal government as well as us state governments to regulate anything is limited to safety and security of and for its citizens , and neither has the authority to bestow constitutional protections upon a zygote , or embryo or fetus that has not met a live birth requirement to receive them .

There is a covert ruse among the fake " anti federalism , it is a state rite " red herring hubris , which contends that federal law and state law are distinct , even with respect to abortion , and the intent of the covert ruse is to proscribe abortion at the federal level that applies to federal employees and federal mail , so stop attempting to deceive others and yourself about it .

* Abortion Anti-Choice Are Traitors Against Us Constitution And Revile Us Citizenship And Autonomy Of Us Citizens *

See, this is the problem that roe created, along with the ever expanding power creep of the federal government. We let it get so big that now people believe it has the power to do anything it wants.

That assessment of roe is idiotic and stupid .

The federal judiciary of the roe v wade court determined that neither the federal nor state governments are entitled to proscribe abortion , because neither the federal government nor state government are allowed to provide constitutional protections to a zygote , or to an embryo , or to a fetus which has not met a live birth requirement of a citizen - and that requirement is the basis of equal protection .

State may regulate abortion procedures to ensure that they are safe for the individual citizen and nothing else , period and end of debate .

The abortion anti-choice could not swing the necessary constitutional amendment and chose sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and should be charge with the crime just as any other despot that suspended us constitution and deprived us citizens of their constitutional entitlements .

As far as this anti-federalist , ant-statist and most of all us citizen is concerned , if any thing has not met a live birth requirement which was required for instantiation of my constitutional protctions , then equal protection that woiuld include a rite to life is not to be expected .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Continuation Of Banter For Abortion Anti-Choice Lies "

* Reductio Ab Absurdum Means No Authority To Proscribe Abortion Else Violate A Live Birth Requirement Of Citizens And Their Equal Protection *

You mean to state that the rite to abortion is not enumerated , not that abortion is not a non enumerated rite , and states can be prohibited from proscribing an act that is a non enumerated rite , else you are denying altogether that there is such a thing as a non enumerated rite , which means that you are denying the 9th amendment exists at all .

The reason abortion is a non enumerated rite and that states are prohibited from proscribing abortion is that neither the federal government nor state governments have a legitimate interest in protecting a rite to life of anything that has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , and that is because a live birth is the only non incidental requirement for becoming either a citizen of us federate or a citizen of us a us state .

* Abortion Anti-Choice Lying Through Traitorous Teeth In Support Of Sedition *

The authority of us federal government as well as us state governments to regulate anything is limited to safety and security of and for its citizens , and neither has the authority to bestow constitutional protections upon a zygote , or embryo or fetus that has not met a live birth requirement to receive them .

There is a covert ruse among the fake " anti federalism , it is a state rite " red herring hubris , which contends that federal law and state law are distinct , even with respect to abortion , and the intent of the covert ruse is to proscribe abortion at the federal level that applies to federal employees and federal mail , so stop attempting to deceive others and yourself about it .

* Abortion Anti-Choice Are Traitors Against Us Constitution And Revile Us Citizenship And Autonomy Of Us Citizens *

That assessment of roe is idiotic and stupid .

The federal judiciary of the roe v wade court determined that neither the federal nor state governments are entitled to proscribe abortion , because neither the federal government nor state government are allowed to provide constitutional protections to a zygote , or to an embryo , or to a fetus which has not met a live birth requirement of a citizen - and that requirement is the basis of equal protection .

State may regulate abortion procedures to ensure that they are safe for the individual citizen and nothing else , period and end of debate .

The abortion anti-choice could not swing the necessary constitutional amendment and chose sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and should be charge with the crime just as any other despot that suspended us constitution and deprived us citizens of their constitutional entitlements .

As far as this anti-federalist , ant-statist and most of all us citizen is concerned , if any thing has not met a live birth requirement which was required for instantiation of my constitutional protctions , then equal protection that woiuld include a rite to life is not to be expected .

Yeah, the 9th amendment says that there are other rights retained by the people, but the it doesn’t say the federal government can have say in it. Basically the 9th amendment is saying that the bill of rights is not to be construed to be the ONLY rights people have, but the 10th amendment say what role the federal government can have in our lives and the rest is to be relegated to the states.

The federal judiciary of the roe v wade court determined that neither the federal nor state governments are entitled to proscribe abortion ,

That’s because roe was wrong. The federal judiciary and dictate what a state can or can’t do unless the cotus prohibits the state from doing it, or assigns that authority to the federal government.

What you are suggesting is a system where there are no constraints on the power of the federal government. That is exactly why we are in this position today.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" More Hubris About Non Enumerated Rites Do Not Exist That Prohibit Unrestrained Regulation By State Populism "

* Anti-Federalism Continues To Promote Unrestrained Statistism To Ignore Non Enumerated Rites Retained By The People *

Yeah, the 9th amendment says that there are other rights retained by the people, but the it doesn’t say the federal government can have say in it. Basically the 9th amendment is saying that the bill of rights is not to be construed to be the ONLY rights people have, but the 10th amendment say what role the federal government can have in our lives and the rest is to be relegated to the states.

However one chooses to articulate it by avoiding to acknowledge non enumerated rites , the proscription of abortion is not a legitimate interest of the federal government and neither is it a legitimate interest of state government , whereas regulation to make abortion procedures safe for individual citizens is a state entitlement where state jurisdiction prevails and it is a federal entitlement where an federal entitlement exists .

An absolute supposition that a federal obligation does not exist in areas of the federal government not controlled by state interests , such as policy for federal such as employees , the military , us mail and property under its control do apply .

Thus , the covert ruse to proscribe abortion at the federal level to areas of the federal government which do not include state jurisdiction is obvious .

* Dobbs Is Dumfounded Sedition Supported By Judicial Ignorance Of Traitors While Roe V Wade Applied Logical Rigor Of Political Science FIrst Principles And Originalism Of Us Constitution *

That’s because roe was wrong. The federal judiciary and dictate what a state can or can’t do unlesz the cotus prohibits the state from doing it, or assigns that authority to the federal government.

There goes the lie that a non enumerated rite can not exist that prohibits states from any form of regulation , simply because it is not enumerated , of which proscribing abortion is included .

The roe v wade decision specified that states may regulate abortion in the second trimester to ensure that the procedures are safe , this is as first trimester procedures were consdiered safe , and that states could not proscribe abortion until third trimester that is based on a live birth requirement for instantiation of a us citizen upon which a legitimate federal or state interest relies , in that an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement requirement .

* Federal Government Red Herring For Democrat Ideologies Of Populism For Tyranny By Collective Majoirty At State Level As Traitors Against Independence Of The Individual As VIrtue For Us Republic *

What you are suggesting is a system where there are no constraints on the power of the federal government. That is exactly why we are in this position today.

Hardly , the suggestion being made by the abortion anti-choice is that states do not have constraints or prohibitions on any rite that is not numerated in us constitution .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" More Hubris About Non Enumerated Rites Do Not Exist That Prohibit Unrestrained Regulation By State Populism "

* Anti-Federalism Continues To Promote Unrestrained Statistism To Ignore Non Enumerated Rites Retained By The People *

However one chooses to articulate it by avoiding to acknowledge non enumerated rites , the proscription of abortion is not a legitimate interest of the federal government and neither is it a legitimate interest of state government , whereas regulation to make abortion procedures safe for individual citizens is a state entitlement where state jurisdiction prevails and it is a federal entitlement where an federal entitlement exists .

An absolute supposition that a federal obligation does not exist in areas of the federal government not controlled by state interests , such as policy for federal such as employees , the military , us mail and property under its control do apply .

Thus , the covert ruse to proscribe abortion at the federal level to areas of the federal government which do not include state jurisdiction is obvious .

* Dobbs Is Dumfounded Sedition Supported By Judicial Ignorance Of Traitors While Roe V Wade Applied Logical Rigor Of Political Science FIrst Principles And Originalism Of Us Constitution *

There goes the lie that a non enumerated rite can not exist that prohibits states from any form of regulation , simply because it is not enumerated , of which proscribing abortion is included .

The roe v wade decision specified that states may regulate abortion in the second trimester to ensure that the procedures are safe , this is as first trimester procedures were consdiered safe , and that states could not proscribe abortion until third trimester that is based on a live birth requirement for instantiation of a us citizen upon which a legitimate federal or state interest relies , in that an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement requirement .

* Federal Government Red Herring For Democrat Ideologies Of Populism For Tyranny By Collective Majoirty At State Level As Traitors Against Independence Of The Individual As VIrtue For Us Republic *

Hardly , the suggestion being made by the abortion anti-choice is that states do not have constraints or prohibitions on any rite that is not numerated in us constitution .

However one chooses to articulate it by avoiding to acknowledge non enumerated rites

There are no non enumerated rights in the cotus, there are only what the cotus says the government can’t forbid you from. The cotus says we have certain rights that the government can’t take away, then it says what the government can make laws on and everything else is to the states.

Show me abortion in the cotus and you’ll have a case.

The roe v wade decision specified that states may regulate abortion in the second trimester to ensure that the procedures are safe

You keep quoting roe. Roe was wrong, a case that should have said the issue was a state issue, from the very beginning.

Hardly

It’s true. You’re using arguments that say the government can make laws on abortion. If you go that route, you could use the same argument for anything you wanted.

 

[Couchpotato]

By that time it's too late...she's pregnant.

His response is a cop out.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Live Birth Requirement And Equal Protection Are Enumerated And Prohibition Of States To Proscribe Abortion Is Non Enumerated "

* Finally Admitted Grounds For Traitorous Act Of Sedition *

There are no non enumerated rights in the cotus, there are only what the cotus says the government can’t forbid you from. The cotus says we have certain rights that the government can’t take away, then it says what the government can make laws on and everything else is to the states.

There are no non enumerated rites is a double negative which states that only enumerated rites exist and such are traitorous statements against us 9th amendment of us republic .

* States Are Accountable To A Live Birth Requirement For Its Citizenship And As A Requirement For Equal Protection *

Show me abortion in the cotus and you’ll have a case.

You have been shown the requirement to become a citizen of the us federate and a citizen of a us state , and that only non incidental requirement of live birth is also a requirement for equal protection clause within us 14th amendment .

The non enumerated rite of abortion is systemic from an enumerated rite of equal protection that is contingent upon a live birth requirement , as states are consequently prohibited from providing constitutional rites to any which has not met the live birth requirement , and therefore states are prohibited from proscribing abortion , even though states may regulate abortion to ensure its it safe for its citizens .

* Roe V Wade Is Logically Of Course Consistent With Us Constitution *

You keep quoting roe. Roe was wrong, a case that should have said the issue was a state issue, from the very beginning.

The roe v wade court had two options that are legitimately consistent with us constitution .

One option was to rule - logically , of course - that states did not have a legitimate interest in extending constitutional protections - that would include a rite to life - to any thing which did not meet a live birth requirement - that is required to become a us federal or state citizen , such that states were prohibited from proscribing abortion and a constitutional amendment was required .

The alternative option was to rule , as it did through judicial activism , where natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement - that is required to become a us federal or state citizen , given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth , whereby states were allowed to proscribe abortion in third trimester .

* So Say Statists Pandering A Democrat Principle Of Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual As A Basis For Us Republic *

It’s true. You’re using arguments that say the government can make laws on abortion. If you go that route, you could use the same argument for anything you wanted.

Your conclusions are incorrect , as us constitution enumerates the only necessary requirement to become a us citizen and therefore the requisite for equal protection that is also enumerated , as us federate and us states are intrinsically bound with its citizens .

It is the arguments forwarded by yourself that non enumerated rites do not exist that do not prohibit states or the federal government from ruling without discretion .

It is the argument of this moniker that no only do non enumerated rites exist that prohibit states from ruling without discretion , but that the federate and states are intrinsically bound to safety and security of its citizens and citizenship and nothing more .

As previously related , the issue of abortion is not this , " when does life begin ? " , rather the issue of abortion is this , " when does a legitimate state interest begin ? " ; and , the answer to the latter question is contingent on an enumerated rite that requires a live birth to become a citizen and an enumerated rite for equal protection with a citizen that consequently requires a live birth .

 

[ThisIsMe]

" Live Birth Requirement And Equal Protection Are Enumerated And Prohibition Of States To Proscribe Abortion Is Non Enumerated "

* Finally Admitted Grounds For Traitorous Act Of Sedition *

There are no non enumerated rites is a double negative which states that only enumerated rites exist and such are traitorous statements against us 9th amendment of us republic .

* States Are Accountable To A Live Birth Requirement For Its Citizenship And As A Requirement For Equal Protection *

You have been shown the requirement to become a citizen of the us federate and a citizen of a us state , and that only non incidental requirement of live birth is also a requirement for equal protection clause within us 14th amendment .

The non enumerated rite of abortion is systemic from an enumerated rite of equal protection that is contingent upon a live birth requirement , as states are consequently prohibited from providing constitutional rites to any which has not met the live birth requirement , and therefore states are prohibited from proscribing abortion , even though states may regulate abortion to ensure its it safe for its citizens .

* Roe V Wade Is Logically Of Course Consistent With Us Constitution *

The roe v wade court had two options that are legitimately consistent with us constitution .

One option was to rule - logically , of course - that states did not have a legitimate interest in extending constitutional protections - that would include a rite to life - to any thing which did not meet a live birth requirement - that is required to become a us federal or state citizen , such that states were prohibited from proscribing abortion and a constitutional amendment was required .

The alternative option was to rule , as it did through judicial activism , where natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement - that is required to become a us federal or state citizen , given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth , whereby states were allowed to proscribe abortion in third trimester .

* So Say Statists Pandering A Democrat Principle Of Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual As A Basis For Us Republic *

Your conclusions are incorrect , as us constitution enumerates the only necessary requirement to become a us citizen and therefore the requisite for equal protection that is also enumerated , as us federate and us states are intrinsically bound with its citizens .

It is the arguments forwarded by yourself that non enumerated rites do not exist that do not prohibit states or the federal government from ruling without discretion .

It is the argument of this moniker that no only do non enumerated rites exist that prohibit states from ruling without discretion , but that the federate and states are intrinsically bound to safety and security of its citizens and citizenship and nothing more .

As previously related , the issue of abortion is not this , " when does life begin ? " , rather the issue of abortion is this , " when does a legitimate state interest begin ? " ; and , the answer to the latter question is contingent on an enumerated rite that requires a live birth to become a citizen and an enumerated rite for equal protection with a citizen that consequently requires a live birth .

There are no non enumerated rites is a double negative which states that only enumerated rites exist and such are traitorous statements against us 9th amendment of us republic .

I’ve already explained this. 9th amendment just says that there are other rights obtained by the people, but the 10th amendment limits what the government can do.

You have been shown the requirement to become a citizen of the us federate and a citizen of a us state , and that only non incidental requirement of live birth is also a requirement for equal protection clause within us 14th amendment .

Once again, you have failed to understand what I’m saying. My point doesn’t rely on rights, or live birth, or citizenship, it’s purely what the constitution says the government is capable of and what it is not.

The rest of your post is the same explanation of birth rights, which my point doesn’t even consider since it’s not about an abortion rights argument