I need you to explain to me who was prevented from running against her. No one chose to put their hat in the ring besides her you clown. You don't get to pretend otherwise without getting laughed at.
There there.
You could always write in who you prefer.
I don't get my feelings hurt over the absence of my preference. The world wasn't made to cater to me. It's my job to shape it to cater to my needs.
Don’t really need much more if you have 306>232.
All you guys have done is ignore the reality that your blob lost in 2020. So I demonstrated it for you.
I said his policies are moronic. Giving billiionaires a tax break simply exploded the deficit. He wanted the NFS to rake the national forest. He started a trade war that we lost.
Well he killed mothers in the process and forced a 12 y/o girl to become a mother too.
Yeah, they said Biden can do anything he wants while President. I sort of wish he would take those Emperor type powers out for a spin once in a while and stop InSantis and Abbott from their human trafficking tendencies.
I question the results and will as long as democrats have the ability to cheat
You have a problem with reality.
LOL...
I want clean elections that all sides can have confidence in
The set up of the question for openers. It’s demonstrative of the way MAGA frames the narrative. There’s nothing first about the MAGA agenda for anyone but Trump.Have you noticed? In the Media, on the TV, in the Web or here on USMB, every discussion, every heated argument, every thread is against TRUMP! Not only do you never see any JUSTIFICATION for what exactly it is the Harris would do, her POLICIES that would be so much better than Trump's plans, but nothing criticizing Trump plans!
Or anything he actually DID when president. The entire election debate by the Left has been made PERSONAL.
It is all aimed at THE MAN HIMSELF. Trump. You know, that fat, overweight, orange golfer who eats poorly and used to camp around with international models. Every attack is either against HIM or his SUPPORTERS.
You know, those awful, DEPLORABLE, country hicks, hillbillies, backwoods people who have never even had electricity who drive horse-drawn wagons and sleep with their cousins who support Trump. Still living in the 19th century. It is the same bias they cleverly disguised in the 1960s as The Beverly Hillbillies and in the 1970s with Archie Bunker.
In the vernacular of logic, we call that an AD HOMINEM attack--- attacking not the message but the MESSENGER. This is a fallacious argument, it is a personal rather than logical argument first recognized and defined by Aristotle himself. It is a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background.
We have seen it all here countless times by people like Mac1958 and numerous others.
This is the Left. This is the substance of the entire case against Trump (and his supporters). That is the basis of the entire "cult" argument, that by minimizing or delegitimizing the people themselves, you avoid the argument itself. Basically, those attacking Trump, their entire case is: "We didn't like him in 2016 and we still don't like him now." Even when they manage to point to some event, it isn't actually about anything that Trump or his supporters themselves really did, but a situation THE LEFT CREATED that merely INVOLVED Trump or his supporters that they created or drew these people into as a result of their embittered dislike of him.
I dare the Left to present an actual argument here that ISN'T about Trump the man or his supporters! But they cannot. They never do. Worse, they use this same crutch, JUST AS WITH JOE BIDEN in 2020, as their ENTIRE CASE FOR SUPPORTING KAMALA HARRIS. I mean, was there ever a single time since 2020 that you ever heard anyone say: "Gee, instead of Joe, I sure wish we had Harris as president instead?"
The entire case AGAINST Trump or FOR Harris, it is all based on a cleverly disguised leftwing fallacy. This is the core of the means of defeating Kamala Harris at the voting polls--- The Left actually have NO REAL ARGUMENT as to why Trump shouldn't be president or that Harris should be, other than THEY JUST DON'T LIKE HIM.
Ad hominem - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
We had that in 2020, retard. No proof otherwise was ever unearthed much less presented.
Again, retard, we have had mail in elections in about 10% of the states. Red states and blue states. Nobody ever questioned the elections until you lost.
It is for anyone who has reasoning skills, retard.
The "bad fruit" in America is people who came here from shit hole countries.
No. It refers to false prophets.
Look up how the D Party nominated their presidential candidates in the past. It’s not hard.I need you to explain to me who was prevented from running against her. No one chose to put their hat in the ring besides her you clown. You don't get to pretend otherwise without getting laughed at.
There there.
You could always write in who you prefer.
Why, when this was a unique situation where the nominee dropped out? It's also not hard to recognize the uniqueness of the nominee dropping out after the primary. How retarded are that you missed that?
No not right. Prove your premise. I'm not buying this argument until you provide some evidence of it.
By you. Why the fuck would I care about your biased opinion?
That's the closest you'll ever get to a Democrat admitting that sKamala sucks..
Lol. Joe didn’t drop out. He was forced out.Why, when this was a unique situation where the nominee dropped out? It's also not hard to recognize the uniqueness of the nominee dropping out after the primary. How retarded are that you missed that?
No not right. Prove your premise. I'm not buying this argument until you provide some evidence of it.
By you. Why the fuck would I care about your biased opinion?
I don't. Also your arguments are shit and based on nothing but your say so.
So you keep insisting but your insistence doesn't mean anything.
Those people came out themselves and said they weren't running against Kamala.
Support the best candidate out of what options I have.
Then inform me. Where is your evidence Clown? I'm not informed by your say so. That's for fucking sure.
You don’t have an understanding of how the uniparty works.So you keep insisting but your insistence doesn't mean anything.
Those people came out themselves and said they weren't running against Kamala.
Support the best candidate out of what options I have.
Then inform me. Where is your evidence Clown? I'm not informed by your say so. That's for fucking sure.
