When Is A Religion Not a 'Religion'?

[PoliticalChic]

Was she thinking of converting to Islam?
Did you ask her?

In any case.....
The plural of anecdote is not 'data.'


Try this:
Let's settle the 'murder' question first.

What possible argument could you pro-abortionists have for murdering a separate and unique human being that would not apply to the same at age 8 months, suckling at its mother's breast?



The silence is deafening....

The law makes a distinction between a live baby and a fetus.

Anything else?

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Hard to imagine that depth of ignorance.

Please drop back when you graduate elementary school, or when the thread gets to monster trucks and favorite 24-Hour All Cartoon Networks.

You're the one who replied with an unlinked comment. But you'd prefer to belittle than have an honest conversation. Got it.

See ya'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you own a calendar?

There is only only one (alleged) religion, called Islam, that has carried 7th century barbarism into the modern world.


Wise up, you dope.

And Judeo-Christianity brought BCE barbarism into the modern world until counter-acted by Enlightenism.

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

Ok, so you admit that some christers (Hitler) were STILL barbarians after the Enlightenment.
(let us all remember that my post was talking about judeo-christianity being barbarous until the Enlightenment.......so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)

You're wrong again.

Sure you don't want to see the list of remedial books I can suggest?


Nazis and Christianity

Christianity had declined severely in Germany at the time the Nazis came to power, which is why the Nazis were able to come to power. In his book, The Dictators, Richard Overy states that in the decades preceding the First World War Germany was becoming increasingly secular, and that after that war, from 1918 to 1931, 2.4 million Evangelical Christians formally renounced their faith as well as almost half a million Catholics. In Prussia, only 21% of the population took communion and in Hamburg only five percent of the population took communion. Before Hitler, German religious leaders were publicly condemning the rise of moral relativism and decline of traditional religious values.

This hostility or indifference toward Christianity in Europe, and especially in Germany, led naturally to a profound anti-Christian sentiment in Nazi Germany. Nazis, more than most Germans, were indifferent or hostile to Christianity. Hitler originally appeared to just ignore Christianity. "
Articles: The Nazis and Christianity


You may or may not be intelligent...but you certainly are uneducated.

Work on that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you own a calendar?

There is only only one (alleged) religion, called Islam, that has carried 7th century barbarism into the modern world.


Wise up, you dope.

And Judeo-Christianity brought BCE barbarism into the modern world until counter-acted by Enlightenism.

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

Ok, so you admit that some christers (Hitler) were STILL barbarians after the Enlightenment.
(let us all remember that my post was talking about judeo-christianity being barbarous until the Enlightenment.......so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)

1. ".so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)"

'Begs the question' means the very opposite of what you imagine it does.

2. You don't read carefully.....is it your eyesight or your intellect?
Again:
If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror

 

[PoliticalChic]

Was she thinking of converting to Islam?
Did you ask her?

In any case.....
The plural of anecdote is not 'data.'


Try this:
Let's settle the 'murder' question first.

What possible argument could you pro-abortionists have for murdering a separate and unique human being that would not apply to the same at age 8 months, suckling at its mother's breast?



The silence is deafening....

The law makes a distinction between a live baby and a fetus.

Anything else?

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Hard to imagine that depth of ignorance.

Please drop back when you graduate elementary school, or when the thread gets to monster trucks and favorite 24-Hour All Cartoon Networks.

I see that you have fallen and can't get up.......thus the resorting to nothing but personal insults.

I'm really good at insults....

...but, then, I'm really good at everything I do.

 

[Taz]

The law makes a distinction between a live baby and a fetus.

Anything else?

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Hard to imagine that depth of ignorance.

Please drop back when you graduate elementary school, or when the thread gets to monster trucks and favorite 24-Hour All Cartoon Networks.

You're the one who replied with an unlinked comment. But you'd prefer to belittle than have an honest conversation. Got it.

See ya'

So you can't link to what you said. You suck at this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you own a calendar?

There is only only one (alleged) religion, called Islam, that has carried 7th century barbarism into the modern world.


Wise up, you dope.

And Judeo-Christianity brought BCE barbarism into the modern world until counter-acted by Enlightenism.

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

That's not proof moron. That's delusion.
Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin and so on are liberals?
What the hell is wrong with you. Why do you think those guys want to kill teachers and college professors.
You want proof?
This is proof:

The majority of Republicans say colleges are bad for America (yes, really)

America hits peak anti-intellectualism: Majority of Republicans now...

And there you are, leading the charge.

Don't you have some gays you want to kill?

"That's not proof moron."



Grammatically correct would be:

"That's not proof, moron."




"I like cooking my family and my pets."

Use commas, don't be a psycho.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you own a calendar?

There is only only one (alleged) religion, called Islam, that has carried 7th century barbarism into the modern world.


Wise up, you dope.

And Judeo-Christianity brought BCE barbarism into the modern world until counter-acted by Enlightenism.

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

That's not proof moron. That's delusion.
Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin and so on are liberals?
What the hell is wrong with you. Why do you think those guys want to kill teachers and college professors.
You want proof?
This is proof:

The majority of Republicans say colleges are bad for America (yes, really)

America hits peak anti-intellectualism: Majority of Republicans now...

And there you are, leading the charge.

Don't you have some gays you want to kill?

"Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin and so on are liberals?"

The Shameful Six are
Communists, Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives and Socialists.

Nary a difference in any of these Leftist iterations.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Hard to imagine that depth of ignorance.

Please drop back when you graduate elementary school, or when the thread gets to monster trucks and favorite 24-Hour All Cartoon Networks.

You're the one who replied with an unlinked comment. But you'd prefer to belittle than have an honest conversation. Got it.

See ya'

So you can't like to what you said. You suck at this.

1. "So you can't like to what you said."
Is English a second language for you?
Do you have a first language?

2. You've been dissed and dismissed.
Why are you back?

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. To put the 'religion' that is at the center of this discussion in perspective, there is this:
There is only one (alleged) religion in which the more fervent the individual adherent is, the more violent and dangerous.


And the reason that this is important to Americans?

It is how Democrats respond to this fact:


"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton wants to let 500 percent more Syrians into the U.S."
Would Clinton boost Syrian refugees 500 percent?

And politifact had to admit it.


And some wonder why she lost the election......

 

[Taz]

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Hard to imagine that depth of ignorance.

Please drop back when you graduate elementary school, or when the thread gets to monster trucks and favorite 24-Hour All Cartoon Networks.

You're the one who replied with an unlinked comment. But you'd prefer to belittle than have an honest conversation. Got it.

See ya'

So you can't like to what you said. You suck at this.

1. "So you can't like to what you said."
Is English a second language for you?
Do you have a first language?

2. You've been dissed and dismissed.
Why are you back?

*link*
I'll ask again, you spout something random and have no link to it? You suck at this.

 

[GreenBean]

That's delusion.
Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin and so on are liberals?

It depends on your definition of Liberal. In the classical sense a liberal is an open minded free thinker, but the word "Liberal" has been hijacked by Authoritarians and Modern day Nazis aka Lefatrds who call themselves "Liberals". In can be looked at somewhat like Orwellian Newspeak much like the word "Gay" being transferred to sexually dysphoric and diseased homosexuals or substittting "Climate Change" for Global Warming .... basicall Sh*t by any other name is still Dung

So in conclusion YES ... by Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin can all be grouped together with Modern Day "Liberals"

 

[GreenBean]

They would be, if you Leftists didn't murder them.

You agree with that...don't you?


How about this....do you agree with it?
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Really:
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — The wife of a conservative Michigan lawmaker says in a Facebook posting that she had an abortion while in high school and went public with it after someone approached her husband vowing to disclose the information.

In a public Facebook post last Friday, Stephanie Chatfield, the wife of GOP state Rep. Lee Chatfield from Levering Township wrote, “You informed my husband that you had heard a rumor, and that you would keep digging. You promised that you would ensure that this story went public. In fact, your desire to see this story go public emboldened me to do something that I should have done years ago.

“After speaking it over with my husband, I felt that telling my story was best,” she continued. “And no matter the intentions of anybody wishing to see this story go public, this I am certain of: God meant it for good and will glorify Himself through this.”

Conservative Michigan lawmaker's wife reveals teen abortion

and this wacko think God meant it for good. Its ok when the conservatives do it?

Was she thinking of converting to Islam?
Did you ask her?

In any case.....
The plural of anecdote is not 'data.'


Try this:
Let's settle the 'murder' question first.

What possible argument could you pro-abortionists have for murdering a separate and unique human being that would not apply to the same at age 8 months, suckling at its mother's breast?



The silence is deafening....

The law makes a distinction between a live baby and a fetus.

Anything else?

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Dude - if you don't know who Dred Scott was - you have no business engaging in a battle of the minds - you are totally unarmed

 

[GreenBean]

In the modern era, the practice of beheading first came to Western attention when Muhammad Ahmad of the Sudan declared himself Mahdi in 1880 and waged a jihad against Ottoman Egyptian and British forces. Ahmad's followers routinely beheaded their opponents, most famously British Gen. Charles Gordon.

The first execution by guillotine was performed on 25 April 1792 in France. What it replaced was truly horrendous.

There is a difference between religion and culture. Most Muslims are not Arabs and don't share their culture. Plenty of what we view today as barbaric was done by Muslims in the name of Allah but I'd guess that every religion has its share of barbarism.

Re: "every religion has its share of barbarism."

You did mean to use the past tense "HAD" did you not ?

I honestly didn't think much about it when I wrote it. Thinking a bit more I'd have to say no, there is still barbarism being done in the name of every religion. The KKK burns crosses, Israelis practice collective punishment, and ISIS needs no examples.

The KKK is not a religion ... it was a militant branch of the Democratic Party

When the Democratic party was the southern majority and the party of slavery. Now, the GOP is the majority party in the south. The current home of the confederate conservatives.

It can't be denied.

Democratic Strategists, of whom Johnson was one, realized the importance of the Negro vote and in this light Johnson explained the strategy

'These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now, we've got to do something about this; we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. for if we don't move at all, then their allies [The Republicans] will line up against us and there will be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there will be no way of putting the brake on all sorts of wild legislation, it'll be reconstruction all over again' - Lyndon Johnson [ Inside the White House ]

Democratic Parties Racist History

 

[GreenBean]

Do the majority of Republicans believe in mass murder? Probably. As far as I know, there aren't any statistics saying they don't.

That's gotta be the most asinine post I ever did see ... Do the majority of Democrats believe in mass murder? STFU douchebag

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Sometimes we can see our future without having to live it.

Europe does that service for us.
..When Western elites reject the Judeo-Christian faith....this is the result:


"... the district court in Munich recently sentenced a German journalist, Michael Stürzenberger, to six months in jail for posting on his Facebook page a historical photo of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, shaking the hand of a senior Nazi official in Berlin in 1941. The prosecution accused Stürzenberger of "inciting hatred towards Islam" and "denigrating Islam" by publishing the photograph. The court found Stürzenberger guilty of "disseminating the propaganda of anti-constitutional organizations".


While the mutual admiration that once existed between al-Husseini and German Nazis is an undisputed historical fact, now evidently history is being rewritten by German courts. Stürzenberger has appealed the verdict.


Last year, London mayor Sadiq Khan's Office for Policing and Crime (Mopac) announced it was spending £1,730,726 of taxpayer money policing speech online after applying for a grant from the Home Office. Meanwhile, Khan said that he does not have the funds to monitor the 200 jihadists estimated to be in London, out of the 400 jihadists who have so far returned to the capital from Syria and Iraq.


When Morgan asked what could possibly be a bigger priority than, "people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with intent to harm British citizens", Khan did not answer. Perhaps because it is hard to admit in public that fighting "Islamophobia" is now a higher priority than fighting terrorism?"
Germany: Full Censorship Now Official




Just imagine what would have happened if Hillary had won.

 

[bodecea]

And Judeo-Christianity brought BCE barbarism into the modern world until counter-acted by Enlightenism.

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

Ok, so you admit that some christers (Hitler) were STILL barbarians after the Enlightenment.
(let us all remember that my post was talking about judeo-christianity being barbarous until the Enlightenment.......so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)

You're wrong again.

Sure you don't want to see the list of remedial books I can suggest?


Nazis and Christianity

Christianity had declined severely in Germany at the time the Nazis came to power, which is why the Nazis were able to come to power. In his book, The Dictators, Richard Overy states that in the decades preceding the First World War Germany was becoming increasingly secular, and that after that war, from 1918 to 1931, 2.4 million Evangelical Christians formally renounced their faith as well as almost half a million Catholics. In Prussia, only 21% of the population took communion and in Hamburg only five percent of the population took communion. Before Hitler, German religious leaders were publicly condemning the rise of moral relativism and decline of traditional religious values.

This hostility or indifference toward Christianity in Europe, and especially in Germany, led naturally to a profound anti-Christian sentiment in Nazi Germany. Nazis, more than most Germans, were indifferent or hostile to Christianity. Hitler originally appeared to just ignore Christianity. "
Articles: The Nazis and Christianity


You may or may not be intelligent...but you certainly are uneducated.

Work on that.

Hitler was christian and he used christianity to hook Germans to his cause.....you can deny it all you want....and I can certainly understand why you'd want to deny it.....but own it.....the NAZIs considering themselves as christians.

 

[GreenBean]

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

Ok, so you admit that some christers (Hitler) were STILL barbarians after the Enlightenment.
(let us all remember that my post was talking about judeo-christianity being barbarous until the Enlightenment.......so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)

You're wrong again.

Sure you don't want to see the list of remedial books I can suggest?


Nazis and Christianity

Christianity had declined severely in Germany at the time the Nazis came to power, which is why the Nazis were able to come to power. In his book, The Dictators, Richard Overy states that in the decades preceding the First World War Germany was becoming increasingly secular, and that after that war, from 1918 to 1931, 2.4 million Evangelical Christians formally renounced their faith as well as almost half a million Catholics. In Prussia, only 21% of the population took communion and in Hamburg only five percent of the population took communion. Before Hitler, German religious leaders were publicly condemning the rise of moral relativism and decline of traditional religious values.

This hostility or indifference toward Christianity in Europe, and especially in Germany, led naturally to a profound anti-Christian sentiment in Nazi Germany. Nazis, more than most Germans, were indifferent or hostile to Christianity. Hitler originally appeared to just ignore Christianity. "
Articles: The Nazis and Christianity


You may or may not be intelligent...but you certainly are uneducated.

Work on that.

Hitler was christian and he used christianity to hook Germans to his cause.....you can deny it all you want....and I can certainly understand why you'd want to deny it.....but own it.....the NAZIs considering themselves as christians.

Your understanding of Hitler in a true Historical perspective is very weak, but then again most of you intellectual endeavors are pretty lame. Hitler utilized the Christian Faith of the German people to his advantage ,his religious beliefs however were a chaotic meld of Pagan, Islamic and Occult beliefs.

A few Hitler quotes to nibble on

"You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"

"The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science... The instructions of a hygienic nature that most religions gave, contributed to the foundation of organized communities. The precepts ordering people to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret — all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory. Observe, by the way, that, as a corollary, the Moslem was promised a paradise peopled with sensual girls, where wine flowed in streams — a real earthly paradise. The Christians, on the other hand, declare themselves satisfied if after their death they are allowed to sing hallelujahs! ...Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that's why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.!"

 

[Taz]

Really:
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — The wife of a conservative Michigan lawmaker says in a Facebook posting that she had an abortion while in high school and went public with it after someone approached her husband vowing to disclose the information.

In a public Facebook post last Friday, Stephanie Chatfield, the wife of GOP state Rep. Lee Chatfield from Levering Township wrote, “You informed my husband that you had heard a rumor, and that you would keep digging. You promised that you would ensure that this story went public. In fact, your desire to see this story go public emboldened me to do something that I should have done years ago.

“After speaking it over with my husband, I felt that telling my story was best,” she continued. “And no matter the intentions of anybody wishing to see this story go public, this I am certain of: God meant it for good and will glorify Himself through this.”

Conservative Michigan lawmaker's wife reveals teen abortion

and this wacko think God meant it for good. Its ok when the conservatives do it?

Was she thinking of converting to Islam?
Did you ask her?

In any case.....
The plural of anecdote is not 'data.'


Try this:
Let's settle the 'murder' question first.

What possible argument could you pro-abortionists have for murdering a separate and unique human being that would not apply to the same at age 8 months, suckling at its mother's breast?



The silence is deafening....

The law makes a distinction between a live baby and a fetus.

Anything else?

So....you agreed with the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, too?

Not too strong in the thinking department, are you.


Anything else?

Don't know who that is. Please try again.

Dude - if you don't know who Dred Scott was - you have no business engaging in a battle of the minds - you are totally unarmed

You're the one who doesn't know how a link works. Now go pull up your pants.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Egads! You're a dunce!!!

Write about something you understand!!!!


I don't have the time nor the interest to teach you everything you never learned....but here's the central nugget:

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror


Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism"


There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason.


I'd be more than happy to provide a short list of books you should....should....read.

What you posted doesn't change what I said one iota.

Here are some examples of christian barbarism:

The Crusades
The Inquisition
The St. Bartholomew Day Massacre
The Salem Witch trials
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Any and all pograms
The 30 Years War

And here is the proof of what I wrote:

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000
#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium


From the Left....you know....your side.

Ok, so you admit that some christers (Hitler) were STILL barbarians after the Enlightenment.
(let us all remember that my post was talking about judeo-christianity being barbarous until the Enlightenment.......so it begs the question, why does PC start talking about communists...Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot and Shito-ists....Tojo)

You're wrong again.

Sure you don't want to see the list of remedial books I can suggest?


Nazis and Christianity

Christianity had declined severely in Germany at the time the Nazis came to power, which is why the Nazis were able to come to power. In his book, The Dictators, Richard Overy states that in the decades preceding the First World War Germany was becoming increasingly secular, and that after that war, from 1918 to 1931, 2.4 million Evangelical Christians formally renounced their faith as well as almost half a million Catholics. In Prussia, only 21% of the population took communion and in Hamburg only five percent of the population took communion. Before Hitler, German religious leaders were publicly condemning the rise of moral relativism and decline of traditional religious values.

This hostility or indifference toward Christianity in Europe, and especially in Germany, led naturally to a profound anti-Christian sentiment in Nazi Germany. Nazis, more than most Germans, were indifferent or hostile to Christianity. Hitler originally appeared to just ignore Christianity. "
Articles: The Nazis and Christianity


You may or may not be intelligent...but you certainly are uneducated.

Work on that.

Hitler was christian and he used christianity to hook Germans to his cause.....you can deny it all you want....and I can certainly understand why you'd want to deny it.....but own it.....the NAZIs considering themselves as christians.

Actually, it is the Leftists who want to hide their associations with evil by trying to claim attachment to religion.
Leftists are communists, Nazis, Socialists, Liberals, Fascists and Progressives.



Communism and Nazism spring from the same sources, including a hatred of religion.



"In February 1937 Hanns Kerrl, Minister of Religion in the Third Reich, said:

"The question of the divinity of Christ is ridiculous and inessential. A new answer has arisen as to what Christ and Christianity are: Adolph Hitler."

University Nazis in Keil wrote in 1935:

"We Germans are heathens and want no more Jewish religion in our Germany. We no longer believe in the Holy Ghost; we believe in the Holy Blood."

Preaching from the pulpit against Rosenberg's racial theories was forbidden by the Nazis and Law 130 threatened penalties against any priest who preached "against the interest of the state." Göring ordered that the Hitler Gruss (the Hitler salute) was the only religious gesture allowed.


Just as Nazi propaganda made odious caricatures of lecherous Jewish preying on young German maidens, Nazi propaganda made identical caricatures of lecherous priests preying on young German maidens. In August 1935, the bishops of Germany presented at Fulda a pastoral letter warning of the Nazi "campaign of annihilation against Christianity" and a year after that Bishop Bornewasser publicly spoke about the Christian men and women who were persecuted by the Nazis because of their faith. On November 4, 1936, the Nazis ordered the removal of crucifixes from schools in the Oldenburg area on the grounds that these were "symbols of superstition." This order was rescinded only after Nazis were faced with determined local opposition. Then despite rescinding the Nazi prohibition of these "symbols of superstition," in December 1936 Nazi bureaucrats simply removed crucifixes anyway in Munsterland. When Christians replaced them in some schools, they were arrested by the Nazis."
Bruce Walker is the author of the book Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie.
Articles: The Nazis and Christianity


I can provide the remediation that you so sorely require.....

....just say the word.



You'll be better for it.
I promise.

 

[alang1216]

Actually, it is the Leftists who want to hide their associations with evil by trying to claim attachment to religion.

Except for the European socialists of today, I can't think of ANY government that has NOT tried to tie themselves to religion. For communists it was cults of Lenin, Mao, etc. For Nazis, Hitler of course. For kings it was rule by "Divine Right". Even the US is based on endowments of a creator.

Leftists are communists, Nazis, Socialists, Liberals, Fascists and Progressives.

This is patently absurd. I know you like to associate all evils with the left but neither Nazis or Fascists were leftists. They are ultra-nationalists and therefore most closely associated with our own alt-right.