"We'll drink Jews' blood" - Genocide drive since 1920 by Arab-Muslims against Jews in Israel "palestine"

Sayaras

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
2,207
Points
928
Excerpts from a long article:

That's how it all started.
The "opening shot" of the Jewish-Arab blood battle for this land was heard on Passover 93 years ago, in the forgotten events of the 19th century - the first significant defining event in the national and religious struggle between the two peoples.
Nadav Shragai. Israel Hayom. 24/3/2013.


[...]. The time was approximately 11:30 a.m., April 4, 1920 (15 Nisan 5680), the first day of the Chol HaMoed of Passover holiday in Jerusalem. The death of a threatening crowd was heard from afar. The Arabs in the nearby markets of the old city rushed to close the shutters of their shops and locked them. Jews in holiday clothes who prayed on the Western Wall square, quickly folded their prayer shawls and ran in a panic, short of breath, towards their homes.

In the square at the foot of the Jaffa Gate, a picture of Faisal was hoisted, that is, he had already crowned himself the king of Greater Syria. The speeches spoke in condemnation of Zionism. Aref al-Aref spoke from his horse: "The land of Israel is our land - the Jews are our dogs." Hebron Sheikh ended his speech by exclaiming: "Atbakho al yahud" (slaughter the Jews) and the Arab mob (some of Hebron), who had arrived in Jerusalem straight from the Nabi Musa celebrations, erupted. Arab thugs equipped with sticks, knives and swords ran amok in the alleys of the old city. They beat, wounded and killed Jews, robbed shops and raped women.

A handful of Jewish defenders tried to escape in those hours to help the Jewish settlement in the old city. Among them were Zvi Nadav and Nehemiah Rabin. The two were wearing white robes with Star of David symbols on them, their hearts were beating strongly and their clothes hid guns. Suddenly a horrifying sight unfolds before their eyes: ransacked shops, bloodied Jews and feathers, lots of feathers, flying in the air. This feather dance reminded Nadav, the man of the second aliyah, of images from another place, the disturbances in Russia. There, too, the feathers were a symbol of the pogrom.

The Jews were shocked. The surprise was almost complete.

The riots lasted five days. Six Jews were murdered, 211 were injured. Later, this occurrence was characterized by the events of the 19th century. This is how the first images of the Jewish-Arab conflict, which continues to this day, appeared. The first discovery of a violent Arab reaction on a relatively wide scale against Zionism, within the borders of the Land of Israel," as the historian Yigal Elam put it with scientific precision; "a defining event in the history of the Palestinian national movement as well," noted Orientalist Prof. Yehoshua Porat...

From the train, on April 19, on his way to the San Remo Conference, which discussed the distribution of the territories of the Ottoman Empire among the victorious countries, Chaim Weizman, later the country's first president, wrote to his daughter-in-law (his wife, who lives in London): "My dear, a very terrible, very serious thing has happened to us - A pogrom in Jerusalem, with all the side effects and 'charms' of a pogrom. I blame this on the government The actual pogrom, but there is no doubt that they helped him in their passive position... I am tired, shattered, broken and the whole world was for me... If it weren't for the bayonets of the English that got in the way, we would have overcome the Arabs on the very first day: but the English But the English unloaded our weapons of self-defense, arrested our people, including our Vladimir Yevgenievich (Jabotinsky; N.S.) - everything is like with us (in Russia)... and Ruchka, Girl, don't pay attention to the news in the newspapers, they lie. I have all the facts and evidence, and I will publish them. I was interviewed by The Times. But I don't know if they will print the interview!..."...

The events of the 1920 pogrom began far from Jerusalem, at the Nabi Musa Mosque in the Judean Desert. In the background were the Balfour Declaration given about two and a half years earlier, the Arabs' fears of the growth of the Zionist movement and the identification of many of the country's Westerners with the struggle for the establishment of Greater Syria, and Queen Faisal bin Hussein, who wanted to see in the Land of Israel part of it.

In Nabi Musa is found, according to Muslim tradition, the tomb of Moses, one of the prophets who, according to Islam, preceded Muhammad. The celebrations at the place were practiced as early as the time of Saladin, always before the Christian Easter. The goal was to create a Muslim presence there and to block any possibility that the Christian crusaders who were defeated in the battle with Saladin would try to harness the arrival of the multitudes of pilgrims arriving in Jerusalem at that time, in favor of another assault on the city.

"The holiday of Nabi Musa is a political holiday and not a religious holiday..." admitted in his diary ("That's who I am, gentlemen") Khalil a-Sahakhini, an intellectual man and writer, one of the fiercest opponents of Zionism, who lived in Jerusalem in those days, "the religious nature of the holiday, it is only intended to attract the masses to participate otherwise they would not have come." Amin al-Husseini, later the Grand Mufti and Hitler's accomplice, also understood this. In April 1920, Husseini was a young man of about 25 years old, the man who inflamed the crowds in Nabi Musa with inciting chants against the Jews and against the plan to establish a national home for them in the Land of Israel. This was the beginning of a "miraculous" career that Husseini built for himself on the backs of the Jews and the Arabs. The immediate result was 5680 riots [1920].

Prof. Yehoshua Porat, one of the leading orientalists in Israel, who studied the growth of the Palestinian national movement, points out that before the events of Nabi Musa (the events of 1920), the Arab national movement in the Land of Israel still tried to differentiate between the old Jewish residents of the land - mainly the old Yishuv and the Sephardim - and the Zionist immigrants "But in the events of April 1920 in Jerusalem, the Arab crowd rioted without distinguishing between old Jews to the Zionists, and harmed the circles of the old Yishuv that lived in the Old City," explains Porat. "Husseini, who after the disturbances fled to Damascus, effectively erased these differences, and through the mosques on the Temple Mount, which he exalted and used for his political purposes, he laid with his own hands the religious foundation for the conflict between the Jews and the Arabs".

From the balcony of the New Grand Hotel, near the Jaffa Gate, a British officer and his wife watched the first results of the porridge cooked by Husseini. The tumult of the crowd that came from Nabi Musa increased from moment to moment, as did the growing calls of incitement from the Muslim clerics. "The first thing we saw was an old Jew of about 70 who had his head chopped off with an Arab sword and when he fell he was stoned," the officer later described what happened, in a letter to Colonel John Henry Patterson, the commander of the two Hebrew battalions. "For a few moments they did the same to a few more Jews. By that time the crowd had already dispersed and burst into the Old City to scorn and murder. A few hours later, he began to lead away wounded Jews."

In his book "Yeme ha-kalaniyot" [One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate], Tom Segev describes another horrifying moment: "Thugs attacked Hana Yaffe's courtyard, not far from the 'Hutta Gate', one of the gates of the Temple Mount in the Muslim Quarter. Three Jewish families lived in the courtyard and were under a kind of siege. Finally, the attackers broke the courtyard doors, broken in... and the tenants were beaten. Moshe Lifshitz was beaten on the head with an iron rod and the children were also beaten. Lifshitz's sisters were raped one by one. One is married, 25 years old. The other is 15 years old..."






The “New York Times” Finds New Ways to Distort the History of the Israel-Palestinian Conflict. Mosaic Magazine. Feb. 28 2024.


...an Arab mob attacked, murdered, and wounded Jews or that the crowd of perpetrators chanted "nashrab dam al-yahud" ("we will drink the blood of the Jews")... “Mohammad’s religion was born with the sword,” according to the eyewitness Khalil al-Sakakini, a Christian Arab educator.

Morris, B. (2011). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001. United Kingdom: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, p. 95

content - 2025-01-25T234618.663.webp
 
Last edited:
Not really so.
Did it ever stop?
Sakakini was an Arab who opposed zionists, he had no reason to lie. It's his testimony and English officials'.
Khalil's son Sari, who was also anti-Zionist, conducted a poll in February 1941, and most Arab palestinians supported Nazis / Hitler.


_____

Did Palestinians Back the Nazis in World War II?' Daily Alert, May 19, 2022.

... from the moment it became evident that the Germans may pass through Egypt and reach Palestine in spring 1942, Palestinian Arabs switched sides. About 78% of the Arab volunteers deserted the British army, often stealing weapons for the purpose of helping the Germans fight the Jews when the time came. Additionally, a survey in 1941 showed that 88% of Palestinian Arabs supported Nazi Germany, while only 9% backed the British Mandate

__

Morris, Benny. "1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War." United States, Yale University Press, 2008, p. 21.

The Palestinians, Khalil al-Sakakini, a .. Jerusalem educator, jotted down in his diary, "rejoiced [as did 'the whole Arab world'] when the British bastion at Tobruk fell .. to the Germans."

One of the first public opinion polls in Palestine, conducted by al-Sakakini's son, Sari Sakakini, on behalf of the American consulate in Ierusalem, in February 1941 found that 88 percent of the Palestinian Arabs favored Germany and only 9 percent Britain.
__


Cohen, Hillel. "Army of Shadows: Palestinian Collaboration with Zionism, 1917–1948." United States, University of California Press, 2008, p. 175.

Sakakini, conducted surveys in the course of his work at the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem. He asked hundreds of Arabs about their attitudes on the war and the opposing camps. In February 1941, 88 percent of those polled expressed support for Germany, while only 9 percent supported England... "Poll," [February 1941], CZA S25/9226. Army of Shadows

_


Cohen, Michael J. "Britain's Moment in Palestine: Retrospect and Perspectives, 1917-1948." United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. Chapter: "The Arabs and Nazi Germany."

In February 1941 (as Rommel landed his first units in Libya), an opinion poll carried out for the American consulate in Jerusalem among hundreds of Palestinian Arabs found that 88 per cent supported Nazi Germany and only 9 per cent Great Britain.

__

Anti-Semitism and Ignorance.
F. Meiton: The Arabs and the Holocaust.

Fredrik Meiton, November 29, 2010.
...the poll carried out by Sari al-Sakakini, which, in February 1941, put the figure at 88 percent.
IMG-20241021-WA0009.webp
 
Last edited:
Excerpts from a long article:

That's how it all started.
The "opening shot" of the Jewish-Arab blood battle for this land was heard on Passover 93 years ago, in the forgotten events of the 19th century - the first significant defining event in the national and religious struggle between the two peoples.
Nadav Shragai. Israel Hayom. 24/3/2013.


[...]. The time was approximately 11:30 a.m., April 4, 1920 (15 Nisan 5680), the first day of the Chol HaMoed of Passover holiday in Jerusalem. The death of a threatening crowd was heard from afar. The Arabs in the nearby markets of the old city rushed to close the shutters of their shops and locked them. Jews in holiday clothes who prayed on the Western Wall square, quickly folded their prayer shawls and ran in a panic, short of breath, towards their homes.

In the square at the foot of the Jaffa Gate, a picture of Faisal was hoisted, that is, he had already crowned himself the king of Greater Syria. The speeches spoke in condemnation of Zionism. Aref al-Aref spoke from his horse: "The land of Israel is our land - the Jews are our dogs." Hebron Sheikh ended his speech by exclaiming: "Atbakho al yahud" (slaughter the Jews) and the Arab mob (some of Hebron), who had arrived in Jerusalem straight from the Nabi Musa celebrations, erupted. Arab thugs equipped with sticks, knives and swords ran amok in the alleys of the old city. They beat, wounded and killed Jews, robbed shops and raped women.

A handful of Jewish defenders tried to escape in those hours to help the Jewish settlement in the old city. Among them were Zvi Nadav and Nehemiah Rabin. The two were wearing white robes with Star of David symbols on them, their hearts were beating strongly and their clothes hid guns. Suddenly a horrifying sight unfolds before their eyes: ransacked shops, bloodied Jews and feathers, lots of feathers, flying in the air. This feather dance reminded Nadav, the man of the second aliyah, of images from another place, the disturbances in Russia. There, too, the feathers were a symbol of the pogrom.

The Jews were shocked. The surprise was almost complete.

The riots lasted five days. Six Jews were murdered, 211 were injured. Later, this occurrence was characterized by the events of the 19th century. This is how the first images of the Jewish-Arab conflict, which continues to this day, appeared. The first discovery of a violent Arab reaction on a relatively wide scale against Zionism, within the borders of the Land of Israel," as the historian Yigal Elam put it with scientific precision; "a defining event in the history of the Palestinian national movement as well," noted Orientalist Prof. Yehoshua Porat...

From the train, on April 19, on his way to the San Remo Conference, which discussed the distribution of the territories of the Ottoman Empire among the victorious countries, Chaim Weizman, later the country's first president, wrote to his daughter-in-law (his wife, who lives in London): "My dear, a very terrible, very serious thing has happened to us - A pogrom in Jerusalem, with all the side effects and 'charms' of a pogrom. I blame this on the government The actual pogrom, but there is no doubt that they helped him in their passive position... I am tired, shattered, broken and the whole world was for me... If it weren't for the bayonets of the English that got in the way, we would have overcome the Arabs on the very first day: but the English But the English unloaded our weapons of self-defense, arrested our people, including our Vladimir Yevgenievich (Jabotinsky; N.S.) - everything is like with us (in Russia)... and Ruchka, Girl, don't pay attention to the news in the newspapers, they lie. I have all the facts and evidence, and I will publish them. I was interviewed by The Times. But I don't know if they will print the interview!..."...

The events of the 1920 pogrom began far from Jerusalem, at the Nabi Musa Mosque in the Judean Desert. In the background were the Balfour Declaration given about two and a half years earlier, the Arabs' fears of the growth of the Zionist movement and the identification of many of the country's Westerners with the struggle for the establishment of Greater Syria, and Queen Faisal bin Hussein, who wanted to see in the Land of Israel part of it.

In Nabi Musa is found, according to Muslim tradition, the tomb of Moses, one of the prophets who, according to Islam, preceded Muhammad. The celebrations at the place were practiced as early as the time of Saladin, always before the Christian Easter. The goal was to create a Muslim presence there and to block any possibility that the Christian crusaders who were defeated in the battle with Saladin would try to harness the arrival of the multitudes of pilgrims arriving in Jerusalem at that time, in favor of another assault on the city.

"The holiday of Nabi Musa is a political holiday and not a religious holiday..." admitted in his diary ("That's who I am, gentlemen") Khalil a-Sahakhini, an intellectual man and writer, one of the fiercest opponents of Zionism, who lived in Jerusalem in those days, "the religious nature of the holiday, it is only intended to attract the masses to participate otherwise they would not have come." Amin al-Husseini, later the Grand Mufti and Hitler's accomplice, also understood this. In April 1920, Husseini was a young man of about 25 years old, the man who inflamed the crowds in Nabi Musa with inciting chants against the Jews and against the plan to establish a national home for them in the Land of Israel. This was the beginning of a "miraculous" career that Husseini built for himself on the backs of the Jews and the Arabs. The immediate result was 5680 riots [1920].

Prof. Yehoshua Porat, one of the leading orientalists in Israel, who studied the growth of the Palestinian national movement, points out that before the events of Nabi Musa (the events of 1920), the Arab national movement in the Land of Israel still tried to differentiate between the old Jewish residents of the land - mainly the old Yishuv and the Sephardim - and the Zionist immigrants "But in the events of April 1920 in Jerusalem, the Arab crowd rioted without distinguishing between old Jews to the Zionists, and harmed the circles of the old Yishuv that lived in the Old City," explains Porat. "Husseini, who after the disturbances fled to Damascus, effectively erased these differences, and through the mosques on the Temple Mount, which he exalted and used for his political purposes, he laid with his own hands the religious foundation for the conflict between the Jews and the Arabs".

From the balcony of the New Grand Hotel, near the Jaffa Gate, a British officer and his wife watched the first results of the porridge cooked by Husseini. The tumult of the crowd that came from Nabi Musa increased from moment to moment, as did the growing calls of incitement from the Muslim clerics. "The first thing we saw was an old Jew of about 70 who had his head chopped off with an Arab sword and when he fell he was stoned," the officer later described what happened, in a letter to Colonel John Henry Patterson, the commander of the two Hebrew battalions. "For a few moments they did the same to a few more Jews. By that time the crowd had already dispersed and burst into the Old City to scorn and murder. A few hours later, he began to lead away wounded Jews."

In his book "Yeme ha-kalaniyot" [One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate], Tom Segev describes another horrifying moment: "Thugs attacked Hana Yaffe's courtyard, not far from the 'Hutta Gate', one of the gates of the Temple Mount in the Muslim Quarter. Three Jewish families lived in the courtyard and were under a kind of siege. Finally, the attackers broke the courtyard doors, broken in... and the tenants were beaten. Moshe Lifshitz was beaten on the head with an iron rod and the children were also beaten. Lifshitz's sisters were raped one by one. One is married, 25 years old. The other is 15 years old..."






The “New York Times” Finds New Ways to Distort the History of the Israel-Palestinian Conflict. Mosaic Magazine. Feb. 28 2024.


...an Arab mob attacked, murdered, and wounded Jews or that the crowd of perpetrators chanted "nashrab dam al-yahud" ("we will drink the blood of the Jews")... “Mohammad’s religion was born with the sword,” according to the eyewitness Khalil al-Sakakini, a Christian Arab educator.

Morris, B. (2011). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001. United Kingdom: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, p. 95
Yes.
The British Mandate thought that if they promote the agitator, al husseini, he will calm down. But they erred.


Australian Jewish Association - AJA.
October 11, 2020.

The British controllers of the Mandated Land liberated from the Ottomans appointed someone who was later declared a war criminal in the Nuremberg trials..

To control the violence against the Jews, the British appointed Haj Amin al-Husseini, the spiritual-political leader of the Muslims in Mandated Palestine, as the grand mufti of Jerusalem, hoping he would help calm the passions. The British could not have chosen a worse person.

Husseini was a virulent anti-Semite.
He later became a close ally of Adolf Hitler, and actively supported the Final Solution, that is, the mass extermination of Jews.
After WW-II, in Nuremberg trial, Husseini was declared a full-fledged Nazi war criminal for having been actively involved in the Holocaust.
He escaped to Egypt where he was given asylum. There he helped organize many former Nazis/Nazi sympathizers against Israel.
He incited the Arabs with messages like
“Itbah al-Yahud” (kill the Jews) and “Nashrab dam al-Yahud” (we will drink the blood of the Jews), and instigated anti-Jewish riots.
Source
 
BTW, it wasn't just in "Palestine" that Muslims/Arabs supported the Nazis.
All through the Middle East, especially in Syria, Jordon, Iraq, etc. The British had to deal with insurrections that had Nazi support and "fifth columns".

Also, FWIW, this harsh treatment of Jews by Muslims goes back to the 7th century when Muhammad lead his army into the Levant against the Byzantines.
 
drink the blood? only if they are vampires, more accurate would be spill their blood which they continue to do today
 
BTW, it wasn't just in "Palestine" that Muslims/Arabs supported the Nazis.
All through the Middle East, especially in Syria, Jordon, Iraq, etc. The British had to deal with insurrections that had Nazi support and "fifth columns".

Also, FWIW, this harsh treatment of Jews by Muslims goes back to the 7th century when Muhammad lead his army into the Levant against the Byzantines.
True. Especially Iraq and Syria was pro Nazi. Only in Egypt, the Arabs were split almost in the middle.

1941: Right after the failed Arab-Nazi al
Gaylani coup, there was the FARHOUD:


October 7 was the second massacre of Jews for Hamas’ oldest hostage.
Lyn Julius, May 29, 2024:

In March, the family of Shlomo Mansour marked his 86th birthday. Since the Hamas massacre of October 7, his children have not received any sign that he is alive or dead. Mansour is the oldest Israeli hostage in Gaza.

Mansour was abducted from Kibbutz Kissufim, one of several Israeli villages and towns attacked by Hamas. He was among hundreds of hostages dragged across the border into Gaza. But what makes Mansour unique is that he is the only person to have survived two massacres – not just the slaughter of October 7, 2023, but also the Iraqi Farhud of 1-2 June 1941.

In order to convey the enormity of the catastrophe that befell Israel on October 7 – the worst pogrom since the Holocaust – journalists, politicians and analysts have cast around for parallels with pogroms suffered by the Jews of Europe. Few have recalled comparable events in the Middle East itself, where the Jews (contrary to the false narrative that Jews are settler colonialists from Europe) were indigenous for more than two millennia, living in the region over 1,000 years before Islam and the Arab conquest.

The Farhud (Arabic for “forced dispossession”) of 1941 – seven years before the creation of Israel – mirrored the slaughter of October 7 in Israel. Mobs screaming Itbah al-Yehud! (“slaughter the Jews”) murdered hundreds of Jews, wounded 1,000, mutilated babies, raped women, looted and destroyed 900 homes and 586 Jewish-owned businesses.

Jews were thrown into the river Tigris. Iraqi doctors and nurses refused to treat the injured or, worse still, poisoned patients. Police joined the rioters.
 
Last edited:
The Pogrom of 1929.


The British Commission of Inquiry and testimonies of the Pogroms of 1929.


Raymond Cafferrata, the English police officer on duty in Hebron, told the British commission of inquiry: “When I heard shouting in a room, I went up a sort of corridor or tunnel, and saw an Arab cutting the head off a child with a sword. He had already hit him and was about to strike again with the sword, but when he noticed my presence, he tried to land the blow on me. But he missed. He was almost at the end of my rifle barrel. I shot him in the groin. Behind me lay a Jewish woman covered in blood next to a man I recognized, despite his civilian clothes, as an Arab police officer from Jaffa, named Issa Shérif. He was bending over the woman, a dagger in his hand. He saw me and rushed into a nearby room, where he tried to lock himself in, shouting in Arabic: “Your honor, I am a policeman” […]. I entered the room and shot him dead 23.”



The massacre in Hebron marked the end of the city’s Jewish community. Just two days later, what remained of the six hundred Jewish residents left the town under British escort. On August 29, another massacre stained the historic Jewish community of Safed, claiming the lives of eighteen Jews. Five days prior, on August 24, a preceding massacre had resulted in the deaths of twenty-six Jews, each murder accompanied by heinous acts of atrocity, sexual abuse, and torture. In Safed, Hebron, and Jerusalem, it was predominantly Orthodox Judaism that bore the brunt of the massacres. The overall toll of the riots amounted to one hundred and thirty-three Jews and one hundred and sixteen Arabs killed, the latter mostly at the hands of the British police. Three hundred and thirty-nine Jews and two hundred and thirty-two Arabs were also injured.


All the witnesses – Jewish, English, Western consular staff – seemed stunned by the barbarity of the riot. In Hebron, the brutality reached horrifying levels, with Jewish children subjected to torture before being mercilessly murdered. French senator Justin Godart, who had founded the France- Palestine association three years prior, documented these atrocities in his notebooks. “Among those killed, some had their throats slit by the neck or face, while others suffered unimaginable mutilations,” he wrote. “A rabbi’s testicles were removed, and two women had their left hands burned.” The accounts of the Hebron atrocities are chilling: a paralytic was killed and had his eyes gouged out, his daughter raped, and her breasts mutilated; a baker was bound, had his hands and feet tied, and his head placed on a stove; a lady identified as Mrs. Sokolov sat down and slit the throats of six yeshiva students; a schoolteacher from Tel-Aviv was murdered, his throat brutally slashed; a father-in-law, son of the rabbi, was praying when he was scalped and had his brains removed.


The extreme cruelty displayed in Godart’s narrative may spark fears of it being a propaganda story. At the same time, the French journalist Albert Londres, who had returned to the area, provided feedback of the Hebron massacres that supported the French senator’s version: “Around fifty Jewish men and women had taken refuge outside the ghetto, at the Anglo-Palestinian bank. [The Arabs […] were quick to sniff them out. It was Saturday 24th at nine o’clock in the morning. […] But here it is in two words: they cut off hands, they cut off fingers, they held heads over a stove, they enucleated eyes. […] Men are mutilated. Girls as young as 13, mothers and grandmothers, were jostled in blood and raped in chorus 24.”



However, the rioters did not attack the English soldiers who embodied the colonial presence. Historian Nathan Weinstock notes that “what we see here is the crystallization of the age-old hatred for the dhimmi, which takes on fearsome forms as soon as the latter pretends to shake off the yoke that weighs him down…”. 25 For Weinstock, this massacre was similar in nature to the one that struck Assyro-Chaldean Christians in Semile, Iraq, four years later. He sees this massacre as a continuation of the large-scale massacres (which caused around two hundred and fifty thousand victims) which, between 1914 and 1919, had decimated the Assyro-Chaldeans exterminated by the Turks and Kurds in the conflicts during the Ottoman Empire.


Although fiercely anti-Zionist, the Palestinian Communist Party, appalled by the violence, ordered its members to join the ranks of the Jewish defense. The atrocity of the crimes prompted several Muslim notables to issue a joint proclamation dissociating themselves from the “actions of the mob 26“. Despite the fact that several Arab families came to the aid of Jews in distress, many also noted the “perfect equanimity with which these horrors were greeted by the Muslim population, even when they stayed away from the killings 27“.


In Arab society, the account of events does not mention the massacres, but speaks of the “Al-Bouraq revolution”. Thus, “Arab memorialists,” comments historian Henry Laurens […], “consider the acts committed during the violence to be entirely legitimate and overlook the fact that the victims were mainly defenceless civilians – women and children – while they are indignant about the Jewish reprisals 28“. The widespread ignorance of the inflicted suffering and, with a few exceptions, the absence of collective introspection, was verified throughout the Arab world. This is evident in fundraising efforts aimed at supporting the families of Arab rioters involved in the massacres.


For Jewish society, the shock was immense. The Haganah had shown itself to be largely incapable of protecting its own people. Jewish leaders were convinced of the need to transform this modest militia into a small army, and no longer rely solely on the British for defense. The trauma was all the more violent as the Yishuv 29 was weakened by a a difficult immigration situation and an economic depression from which it had only recently begun to recover. Like others, Haïm Weizmann 30, president of the World Zionist Organization, was overcome by pessimism: “The current Arab leaders, murderers and thieves, want only one thing – to throw us into the Mediterranean Sea”, he wrote to Albert Einstein on November 30, 1929 31.


On August 31, 1929, the Muslim Committee for the Defense of the Holy Sites published its version of events. The Jews, it explained, were trying to take over the Esplanade of the Mosques and were causing disturbances around the Western Wall (Al Buraq), prompting the Muslims, in self-defense, to react. In agreement with the Grand Mufti, the Committee demanded that the British disarm “the Jewish soldiers” (the Haganah). This version of events, explains Laurens, “has remained dominant in Muslim writings to this day 32.”


London appointed a commission of inquiry. Headed by Sir Walter Shaw, it arrived in Jerusalem on October 25, 1929, and as the hearings progressed, in a very tense atmosphere (fifty-seven attacks were deplored between the beginning of September and mid-November 1929), the Commission became increasingly disillusioned, fearing that the situation was becoming insoluble. At a hearing on December 2, 1929, the Grand Mufti, after referring at length to the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion 33“, compared himself to Jesus, who, he explained, had been confronted in the same place 1,900 years ago by a tribunal at the request of the Jews who had denounced him.


The fragile trust that had been established here and there in Palestine between Jews and Arabs was shattered. Ties of conviviality and friendship were called into question. Understanding, already precarious, regressed by several decades. The cooperation that sometimes prevailed frayed, if not disappeared altogether, at a time when Jewish demographics were at their worst. For the first time since 1914, fear gripped a large part of Jewish society in Palestine (one hundred and seventy thousand souls). “Are we sitting on a volcano?” read the headline on September 6, 1929, in the Hebrew daily Doar Ha Yom, the mouthpiece of Jabotinsky’s revisionist Zionism 34. Many feared that an eruption of violence would lead to the complete annihilation of the Jewish National Homeland. “The idea of a general massacre of the Jews,” declared Ben Gurion in January 1930, “has gained ground 35“.


___


Notes.

23. Nathan Weinstock, op. cit. p. 202.
24. Albert Londres, Le Juif errant est arrivé (1929), éditions 10-18, 1975, p.198.
25. Nathan Weinstock, op. cit. p. 203.
26. Abdul Wahab Kayyali, Histoire de la Palestine, 1896-1940, translated from Arabic, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1985.+
27. Nathan Weinstock, op. cit. p. 204.
28. Henry Laurens, La Question de Palestine, Tome 2, p. 175.
29. The Hebrew term Yishuv referred to the community of Jews living in Palestine before the creation of the State of Israel.+
30. A Russian Jew who became a British citizen, Haïm Weizmann chaired the World Zionist Organization between the wars, and was one of the main architects of the Balfour Declaration in 1917.+
31. Dominique Bourel, Martin Buber, p. 400.
32. Henry Laurens, op. cit. p. 176.
33. See Shoah multimedia encyclopedia [online].
34. Georges Bensoussan, Une Histoire intellectuelle et politique du sionisme, Fayard, 2002, p. 839.+
35. Ibid. p. 839.





Pogroms in Palestine before the creation of the state of Israel (1830-1948).


George Bensoussan. April 2024.


 
drink the blood? only if they are vampires, more accurate would be spill their blood which they continue to do today
Not only in 1920, but in 2006 too..

Hamas Video: “We Are A Nation That Drinks Jewish Blood,” Promises To Kill Jews “Until We Have Quenched Our Thirst With Your Blood”
 
Perhaps Hamas is the party guilty of genocide - of the Palestinian people?

Genocide is defined as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Let's focus on C

Isn't Hamas, by purposely implanting itself in civilian areas, "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part"?

Imagine a scenario where the Lord lifted all Palestinian civilians and deposited them safely in a corner of Gaza that has no strategic importance to Israel. Which side would move to draw them into the fray? Would Israel bomb the now exposed civilians, or would Hamas immediately move weapons and infrastructure into that area?

The answer is clear. Israel would feel pure relief if the civilians were to be removed, while Hamas would immediately move to "inflict conditions of life to bring about their destruction." Without civilian deaths, the Hamas effort crumbles.

And NOTE: Hamas's intent is not to discourage an Israeli attack (which is what the Geneva Conventions contemplated human shields would be used for); To the contrary, Hamas's intent is to have its own civilians die.

By destroying its own ethnic group, Hamas pursues its war objective.

Intent is easy to find:

1. Times interview:
Behind Hamas’s Bloody Gambit to Create a ‘Permanent’ State of War (Published 2023)& Hamas’s Bloody Arithmetic (Published 2023)
Thousands have been killed in Gaza, with entire families wiped out. Israeli airstrikes have reduced Palestinian neighborhoods to expanses of rubble, while doctors treat screaming children in darkened hospitals with no anesthesia. Across the Middle East, fear has spread over the possible outbreak of a broader regional war.
But in the bloody arithmetic of Hamas’s leaders, the carnage is not the regrettable outcome of a big miscalculation. Quite the opposite, they say: It is the necessary cost of a great accomplishment — the shattering of the status quo and the opening of a new, more volatile chapter in their fight against Israel.


2. Multiple other statements (borrowed from here:
https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.pdf, but there are more on MEMRI from the last 2 months):
Hamas (via spokespeople):
2006: “The citizens will continue defending their pride and houses and will continue to serve as human shields until the enemy will withdraw.”
2014: “The fact that people are willing to sacrifice themselves against Israeli warplanes in order to protect their homes, I believe this strategy is proving itself. And we, Hamas, call on our people to adopt this practice.”
2014: “Hamas despises those defeatist Palestinians that criticize the high number of civilian casualties. The resistance praises our people…we lead our people to death…I mean, to war.”Ismail Haniyeh, former Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority (2006- 2014), Head of Hamas Political Bureau in Gaza (since 2017)
2006: Citizens were encouraged to gather at Muhammad Baroud’s house (a prominent PRC combatant) in Jabaliya refugee camp, after the IDF issued a warning. Following the event, Haniyeh stated: “I believe that what has happened tonight will be a role model… an example to our Palestinian people and a clear message, that the [Zionist] aggression will not break our will.”
2008: “Israel threatens to bombard houses [in which freedom fighters live], but hundreds and thousands of Palestinians climb to those houses rooftops in the middle of the night to defend those houses.”Fathi Hamad, Hamas MP
2008: “For the Palestinian people, death has become an industry […]. This is why they have formed human shields of the women, the children, the elderly and the mujahideen.”Khaled Mashal, Head of the Hamas Political Bureau (1996-2017) “If you will foolishly decide to enter Gaza, we will fight you. You will face not only thousands of our combatants, but also a million and a half of our population, driven by the desire to become martyrs.”Ministry of Interior in the Gaza Strip (via spokespeople)
2009: “Men in uniform have been declared targets for air strikes. As a result, while outside in the terrain, uniforms are to be discarded and civilian clothes are to be worn.”Growing Criticism Of Hamas And Its Officials By Gaza Residents: They Brought A Needless War Upon Us; Our Lives Are Worthless In Their Eyes; We Yearn To See The End Of Hamas
2014: "“We call those who evacuated their houses to return immediately and stay there… Israel’s warnings are nothing but psychological warfare… by leaving your houses you assist the enemy to fulfil its plans, that is, annihilating your belongings and houses.”
2023 : Hamas Political Bureau head Isma'il Haniya said on October 26, 2023 that Hamas "needs" the blood of many Gazan civilians – women, children and elderly –"because it awakens within us the revolutionary spirit."

Seems like a strong argument to me.— Noam Dworman (@noam_dworman) January 26, 2024
 
content - 2025-01-31T102730.978.webp
content - 2025-01-31T102725.017.webp

 

The Forum Outcasts are here again , posting madly to each other in order to justify getting paid at the end of the week .

Today it is more novice Hasbara Troll Deflection --asking decent people to ignore their love of Genocide , Apartheid and having Torture Camps .

What a terrible beating the Naziraelis took .
Without an air force and US hand outs they would have been slaughtered
Instead they have been humiliated
 
"We will drink the blood of the Jews . " As is often the case when mobs are worked to a frenzy

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom