When I return ...

[amity1844]

Here's the question again for those who are having trouble focusing:

If I am sitting in my armchair tonight reading a book, and you burst into my house, or sneak into my house, and try to evict me and take possession of my house, I have the right to shoot you, slit your throat, and/or remove you by force.

If you come back two days later and manage to install yourself in my guest room, I still reserve the right to shoot you, and if you are still there in 70 years, I retain the right to shoot you and/or remove you by force at any and every opportunity. If you bring friends, you let them in by the window in the guest room, and then the bunch of you try to take over the guest bath, I still have the same right to shoot, slit, or remove you by force at will.

Because I am not the aggressor in this situation, and my rights are secure. Your usurping my guest room does not give you rights to my bathroom, OR my guest bedroom, and I still do have the right to shoot or slit you and your cohorts of any age whenever and wherever possible, and NO WHINING allowed. If you don't like it, get your effing butts out of my house.

If this moral analogy fails somehow in analyzing the Palestine/Israel situation, please clarify how.

 

[irosie91]

irosie, you are always so off topic I think I need to send you to the electronic cornfield as well.

Zapp!!!

Here's the question again for those who are having trouble focusing:

If I am sitting in my armchair tonight reading a book, and you burst into my house, or sneak into my house, and try to evict me and take possession of my house, I have the right to shoot you, slit your throat, and/or remove you by force.

If you come back two days later and manage to install yourself in my guest room, I still reserve the right to shoot you, and if you are still there in 70 years, I retain the right to shoot you and/or remove you by force at any and every opportunity. If you bring friends, you let them in by the window in the guest room, and then the bunch of you try to take over the guest bath, I still have the same right to shoot, slit, or remove you by force at will.

Because I am not the aggressor in this situation, and my rights are secure. Your usurping my guest room does not give you rights to my bathroom, OR my guest bedroom, and I still do have the right to shoot or slit you and your cohorts of any age whenever and wherever possible, and NO WHINING allowed. If you don't like it, get your effing butts out of my house.

If this moral analogy fails somehow in analyzing the Palestine/Israel situation, please clarify how.

I already did clarify------Israelis are not living in the living rooms of "Palestinians"----or using
their bathrooms------I stongly doubt that anyone would want to use YOUR bathroom

 

[amity1844]

Picture it, Palestine, 1914 ...

irosie, you are such a simpleton. If Zionists immigrate into Palestine without the Palestinians' consent, explain to me why Palestinians do not have the right to respond with force, just the same as if a bandit broke into your house.

And I will stipulate, with deadly force both in Israel and in the occupied territories.

 

[irosie91]

Picture it, Palestine, 1914 ...

irosie, you are such a simpleton. If Zionists immigrate into Palestine without the Palestinians' consent, explain to me why Palestinians do not have the right to respond with force, just the same as if a bandit broke into your house.

And I will stipulate, with deadly force both in Israel and in the occupied territories.

easy-----the Zionists immigrated to Palestine with the consent of the Ottomans and with the
consent later of the BRITISH both of whom made the law in those lands during their times
of rule The people called "Palestinians" in 1914 were jews and only jews-----and jews
did ALSO consent When arabs INVADED east Jeruselam in 1947 ---they certainly did not
have the CONSENT of the jews of that jewish city-------and when they entertained themselves
by slitting the throats of infants in Hebron----1929----they certainly did not have the consent
of the jews who OWNED that land by purchase At no time were jews in the land you now
call Palestine "like bandits breaking in" Jews resided in the land you now call "Palestine"
for more than 3000 years-----sometimes they did flee the violence of murder of the bandits---
but they returned to reclaim that which the rapist and throat slitters had stolen

 

[amity1844]

Picture it, Palestine, 1914 ...

irosie, you are such a simpleton. If Zionists immigrate into Palestine without the Palestinians' consent, explain to me why Palestinians do not have the right to respond with force, just the same as if a bandit broke into your house.

And I will stipulate, with deadly force both in Israel and in the occupied territories.

easy-----the Zionists immigrated to Palestine with the consent of the Ottomans and with the
consent later of the BRITISH both of whom made the law in those lands during their times
of rule The people called "Palestinians" in 1914 were jews and only jews-----and jews
did ALSO consent When arabs INVADED east Jeruselam in 1947 ---they certainly did not
have the CONSENT of the jews of that jewish city-------and when they entertained themselves
by slitting the throats of infants in Hebron----1929----they certainly did not have the consent
of the jews who OWNED that land by purchase At no time were jews in the land you now
call Palestine "like bandits breaking in" Jews resided in the land you now call "Palestine"
for more than 3000 years-----sometimes they did flee the violence of murder of the bandits---
but they returned to reclaim that which the rapist and throat slitters had stolen

Then you need to get your effing COLONIALIST butts out of my house.

And you still refuse to answer the very solid evidence that Palestinians are the indigenous people of Palestine. Why? Because it has been proven that they are descended from ancient Jews and have been there the entire time. You brought hundreds of thousands of people into the country and FORGOT TO ASK PERMISSION of the people who hold your future.