no matter how much i drink or how many times I wack my head with a hammer i still cannot sink to your level of insanity. It is a failing of mine to not see a twisted and really stupid point of view, and i guess i will just have to live with being too smart to understand the retards.
It is insane to expect the president to lead?
Who knew.
Is there some reason for them to suspect obama has new policy? Aftyer 3 and a half years of the same thing should we be worried that all of a sudden obama is going to forget everything he has done and start doing something completely new despite never having mentioned it? This is the same irrational fear and bullshit where the right claims obama is going to take our guns despite supporting america's gun rights. There is no base to the question, and here is nothing behind it.
Is there some reason for them to know Obama's policy? Do you know it? Why do you think a reporter is a right winger just because they actually ask a hard question in a press briefing? When MSNBC asks about the leaks from the White House are they right wing too?
if the point of the question was to point out the political disagreements between the world and isreal then they should have made a question about that. The topic should also be much different than the claim that trhe Obama admin doesn't know what the capital of isreal is. Are you really trying to imply that the Obama administration has no idea about the social and political problems with isreal after 4 years? If that is the question, then the goal of the entire thing is far more sinister as an attempt to provoke a negative reaction which could destabalize the area and situation with isreal further. It is bad enough the right is calling for the republican house to trash the economy over obamacare, but to outright promote a war is just ******* stupid. I was waiting for someone to go down that road and put it flat out that the right deliberately is trying to get the white house to make a comment that is offensive to one side or the other and destroy US relations and provoke war.
Instead of living in a world where everyone that disagrees with you is a nut you might want to check in with reality occasionally.
The White House announced a new agreement with Israel expanding civilian, and military, cooperation. The timing of the announcement was specifically designed to undermine Romney's foreign policy trip and to position Obama as pro Israel.
Since reality actually exists, and in reality, people who attend new briefings at the White House actually pay attention to White house policy announcements, reporters ask specific questions that are related to those announcements.
Your problem is you jumped to a conclusion based on the delusional world you live in where nothing ever happens unless you know about it.
Please do not assume that you know what i do, or that you have the mental capacity to avoid such traps. I have generally found with your type it is best to back you into the corner and then pounce after you admit to the bullshit you are pulling. really, to promote a conflict in the middle east just because you want Obama to make a gaffe is downrigh dangerous, and it is a shitty thing to do.
My type? What type is that? What kind of traps should I think you might catch me in? Could it be something really stupid like posting comments in a thread where I jump to a conclusion without knowing that something else happened that actually prompted someone to do something that is actually quite reasonable? That is so hard for a limited intellect like mine to follow you might actually be able to catch me in it.
Just not today.
All I did was post a video, I didn't trap Obama in anything. I didn't even try because I do not have the access required to do so.
Reality check, even if a conspiracy to make Obama look stupid exists, I am not part of it.
Yes, and he did a good thing by not walking into the right's trap and dismissing the idiots who were trying to stir up violence for their own gain. that is exactly what he is supposed to do. Deflect the question and have obama deal with the world leaders through his position and not through the distortion of the right wing press. He didn't succumb to their taunts that he was ignorant, and he answered their question with the only real answer available for such a short interview. Really, could he have addressed the multitude of concerns and nuances of the issue of isreal with a soundbite? no, and he probably would not be the person to do it either. That answer, if given to the press, should come from Obama.
Stir up violence? How was she trying to stir up violence?
Actually, you are wrong, again. Carney's job is to answer trivial questions like this one so that Obama doesn't have to. This, in your universe, allows him to deal work with leaders of other countries to negotiate the agreement he just announced. In the real world there is an entire department of the Executive Branch that actually negotiates these things. I suggest you Google Hillary Clinton and learn what she is secretary of.
I think you should be aware of my position on the female gender. Wow, that does work well for really assinine comments.
You are the one that called a female reporter a ****. That might not indicate your position on the female gender, but it does indicate your character, which is what I was commenting on.