What you must believe to think Biden is innocent.

[Nostra]

The guy lays everything out in the article, but here is his synopsis at the end. Unfortunately, the liberal board members believe all this.

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Is Innocent - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

We must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people in Biden's circle but not him.

spectator.org

 

[rightwinger]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….

You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

 

[Billiejeens]

No one believes it -

The Democrat Cult simply does not care.

 

[Nostra]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….

You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

I called it.

Cult gonna cult.

 

[DBA]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….

You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

Again, you don't have to actually see it rain to make a reasonable assumption that it did.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump holds small edge over Biden in potential rematch, CBS News poll finds.

 

[White 6]

The guy lays everything out in the article, but here is his synopsis at the end. Unfortunately, the liberal board members believe all this.

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Is Innocent - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

We must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people in Biden's circle but not him.

spectator.org

You mean most people still require evidence in court and out number you here and in most places in the country by a wide margin and you feel burned by the fact as this nagging need for actual evidence has not been eradicated in the post trump era? You guys are failures.

 

[Mac1958]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….

You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

That's all they have to show. "One plus rumor plus frog" does not equal "bribe".

Get that done and we can nail him.

 

[Billiejeens]

You mean most people still require evidence in court and out number you here and in most places in the country by a wide margin and you feel burned by the fact as this nagging need for actual evidence has not been eradicated in the post trump era? You guys are failures.

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

 

[Nostra]

You mean most people still require evidence in court and out number you here and in most places in the country by a wide margin and you feel burned by the fact as this nagging need for actual evidence has not been eradicated in the post trump era? You guys are failures.

Your post might make sense if a sitting President could be indicted. Since he can't, and the process is called Impeachment, your post is useless.

But thanks for stopping by.

 

[Billiejeens]

You mean most people still require evidence in court and out number you here and in most places in the country by a wide margin and you feel burned by the fact as this nagging need for actual evidence has not been eradicated in the post trump era? You guys are failures.

He is literally on video - bragging about a quid pro quo with taxpayer funds.

But that's okay - that just lunch pail joe.

 

[BlindBoo]

He is an established US politicain so of course he is not innocent. The question is, is he guilty of the crimes the Neo-GOP claim he is? They don't have a good record on shit like that do they? I mean look at all the crimes they accused Obama of in his eight years. The got Zip. Look at all the crimes they accuse Hillary of and she was never president. A big Zero. Not to forget the Durham investigation that was going to expose the whole "Obamagate Conspiracy". Nada. Zip, Zero, Nada.

The Neo-GOP is the ultimate Boy Who Cried Wolfe. When will the sheep learn?

 

[candycorn]

Strange how none of this ever came to the surface for 48 years...until now!

 

[DBA]

You mean most people still require evidence in court and out number you here and in most places in the country by a wide margin and you feel burned by the fact as this nagging need for actual evidence has not been eradicated in the post trump era? You guys are failures.

Thanks to Democrats, actual evidence is obviously no longer required for impeachment, though there's plenty in this case.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Again, you don't have to actually see it rain to make a reasonable assumption that it did.

Not in Texas! It never rains here!

 

[White 6]

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

Sure. Why not? Evidence and the requirement for it is what our system is founded on.

 

[Marener]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….

You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

To be a bribe, you don’t have to see the money go to Joe Biden specifically, but you do need to see some agreement that he take an official action for the money given to Hunter.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

Strange how none of this ever came to the surface for 48 years...until now!

No stranger than the same people who praised all the work did for the black community suddenly found him a racist when he ran for office.

If people held their own side to the same standards as the opponents we would be a much better place

 

[Care4all]

Again, you don't have to actually see it rain to make a reasonable assumption that it did.

You can't charge or convict someone on assumptions, thank the Good Lord, for all of us!!!

 

[rightwinger]

The only “evidence” out there is…

Hunter made money in foreign investments
A vague reference to some “Big Guy”
VP Biden engaged in phone calls with his son in front of business associates
As VP, Biden demanded the removal of a corrupt prosecutor