What You Can do to Prevent Election Fraud in November: Demand Full Local Signature-Matching of Mail-In Ballots, with Observers Present

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,196
8,909
2,130
Hand counted ballots and mail-in ballot observed signature verification. There is no reason for anyone of any political party to object to these measures.




On a Bannon War Room podcast, a NM law professor, former prosecutor, and election integrity activist said that acting locally, at the County election commission level, is the key for anyone wishing to help prevent voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections, by demanding of county commissioners that they ban the use of vote counting machines such as Dominion and ES&S, in favor of hand counting ballots. Ballots are counted by hand in Germany, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, and at least 53 other countries.

Also high on the list of confidence-building safeguards against systemic election fraud is the public observation of the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, an area which was especially contentious in the 2020 presidential election.

In the 2020 report “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity: A Case Study of California’s Every Vote Counts Act,” a Stanford University Law School team recommends that election officials should:

“Ensure public observers have sufficient access to the signature verification process. Public observers must be allowed “sufficiently close access” to verify whether county officials are following established procedures for verifying whether ballot return ID envelope signatures match those in a voter’s registration file.”

This would mean that an observer from each political party would have “sufficiently close access” to discern whether a signature matched or not. Where there are questions, further contact with the voter by the election department is warranted.

The NM law professor, David Clements, of Las Cruces, says that voters can “save the country, by fixing their county.”

He urges citizens to confront their county election with clear demands to earn back the trust of voters in US elections, which is at an all-time low.

As controversy rages over mail-in voting, none other than Jimmy Carter has warned that large numbers of mail-in ballots are a recipe for mischief, saying:

“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.... MORE....

Professor David Clements Interview, pertinent remarks on elections at 4:00 minutes (view at Rumble)
 
Hand counted ballots and mail-in ballot observed signature verification. There is no reason for anyone of any political party to object to these measures.




On a Bannon War Room podcast, a NM law professor, former prosecutor, and election integrity activist said that acting locally, at the County election commission level, is the key for anyone wishing to help prevent voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections, by demanding of county commissioners that they ban the use of vote counting machines such as Dominion and ES&S, in favor of hand counting ballots. Ballots are counted by hand in Germany, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, and at least 53 other countries.

Also high on the list of confidence-building safeguards against systemic election fraud is the public observation of the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, an area which was especially contentious in the 2020 presidential election.

In the 2020 report “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity: A Case Study of California’s Every Vote Counts Act,” a Stanford University Law School team recommends that election officials should:

“Ensure public observers have sufficient access to the signature verification process. Public observers must be allowed “sufficiently close access” to verify whether county officials are following established procedures for verifying whether ballot return ID envelope signatures match those in a voter’s registration file.”

This would mean that an observer from each political party would have “sufficiently close access” to discern whether a signature matched or not. Where there are questions, further contact with the voter by the election department is warranted.

The NM law professor, David Clements, of Las Cruces, says that voters can “save the country, by fixing their county.”

He urges citizens to confront their county election with clear demands to earn back the trust of voters in US elections, which is at an all-time low.

As controversy rages over mail-in voting, none other than Jimmy Carter has warned that large numbers of mail-in ballots are a recipe for mischief, saying:

“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.... MORE....

Professor David Clements Interview, pertinent remarks on elections at 4:00 minutes (view at Rumble)

All states already have a requirement of signature matching for their mail in and absentee ballots. Overseen by elections officials from both parties in each state who have been doing the job for a long time. The fault for lack of trust in US elections falls exclusively at the doorsteps of urchins like Bannon and this douchebag crusty.
 
Hand counted ballots and mail-in ballot observed signature verification. There is no reason for anyone of any political party to object to these measures.




On a Bannon War Room podcast, a NM law professor, former prosecutor, and election integrity activist said that acting locally, at the County election commission level, is the key for anyone wishing to help prevent voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections, by demanding of county commissioners that they ban the use of vote counting machines such as Dominion and ES&S, in favor of hand counting ballots. Ballots are counted by hand in Germany, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, and at least 53 other countries.

Also high on the list of confidence-building safeguards against systemic election fraud is the public observation of the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, an area which was especially contentious in the 2020 presidential election.

In the 2020 report “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity: A Case Study of California’s Every Vote Counts Act,” a Stanford University Law School team recommends that election officials should:

“Ensure public observers have sufficient access to the signature verification process. Public observers must be allowed “sufficiently close access” to verify whether county officials are following established procedures for verifying whether ballot return ID envelope signatures match those in a voter’s registration file.”

This would mean that an observer from each political party would have “sufficiently close access” to discern whether a signature matched or not. Where there are questions, further contact with the voter by the election department is warranted.

The NM law professor, David Clements, of Las Cruces, says that voters can “save the country, by fixing their county.”

He urges citizens to confront their county election with clear demands to earn back the trust of voters in US elections, which is at an all-time low.

As controversy rages over mail-in voting, none other than Jimmy Carter has warned that large numbers of mail-in ballots are a recipe for mischief, saying:

“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.... MORE....

Professor David Clements Interview, pertinent remarks on elections at 4:00 minutes (view at Rumble)

Racist!
 
All states already have a requirement of signature matching for their mail in and absentee ballots. Overseen by elections officials from both parties in each state who have been doing the job for a long time. The fault for lack of trust in US elections falls exclusively at the doorsteps of urchins like Bannon and this douchebag crusty.
You would be foolish to think our elections are completely flawless.
 
You would be foolish to think our elections are completely flawless.
There is fraud in every election. Has been since the beginning of time.
But not in the quantity and numbers it would take to turn an election. It doesn't happen.
Election workers from both parties take it very personally when you impugn the integrity of
the process they bust their asses on every couple of years or so.
 
Hand counted ballots and mail-in ballot observed signature verification. There is no reason for anyone of any political party to object to these measures.




On a Bannon War Room podcast, a NM law professor, former prosecutor, and election integrity activist said that acting locally, at the County election commission level, is the key for anyone wishing to help prevent voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections, by demanding of county commissioners that they ban the use of vote counting machines such as Dominion and ES&S, in favor of hand counting ballots. Ballots are counted by hand in Germany, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, and at least 53 other countries.

Also high on the list of confidence-building safeguards against systemic election fraud is the public observation of the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, an area which was especially contentious in the 2020 presidential election.

In the 2020 report “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity: A Case Study of California’s Every Vote Counts Act,” a Stanford University Law School team recommends that election officials should:

“Ensure public observers have sufficient access to the signature verification process. Public observers must be allowed “sufficiently close access” to verify whether county officials are following established procedures for verifying whether ballot return ID envelope signatures match those in a voter’s registration file.”

This would mean that an observer from each political party would have “sufficiently close access” to discern whether a signature matched or not. Where there are questions, further contact with the voter by the election department is warranted.

The NM law professor, David Clements, of Las Cruces, says that voters can “save the country, by fixing their county.”

He urges citizens to confront their county election with clear demands to earn back the trust of voters in US elections, which is at an all-time low.

As controversy rages over mail-in voting, none other than Jimmy Carter has warned that large numbers of mail-in ballots are a recipe for mischief, saying:

“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.... MORE....

Professor David Clements Interview, pertinent remarks on elections at 4:00 minutes (view at Rumble)

Isn't bannon in jail yet?
 
There is fraud in every election. Has been since the beginning of time.
But not in the quantity and numbers it would take to turn an election. It doesn't happen.
Election workers from both parties take it very personally when you impugn the integrity of
the process they bust their asses on every couple of years or so.
Election workers are 100 years old and have the IQ of guppies.
 
There is fraud in every election. Has been since the beginning of time.
But not in the quantity and numbers it would take to turn an election. It doesn't happen.
Election workers from both parties take it very personally when you impugn the integrity of
the process they bust their asses on every couple of years or so.
I'm sorry a little scrutiny hurts their feelings, but if they don't want to be impugned, they should strive to do their jobs dutifully. If the electoral process is that sacrosanct, they need to make sure they give the public no room to criticize. They should make it so that not even one modicum of distrust is justified.
 
Hand counted ballots and mail-in ballot observed signature verification. There is no reason for anyone of any political party to object to these measures.




On a Bannon War Room podcast, a NM law professor, former prosecutor, and election integrity activist said that acting locally, at the County election commission level, is the key for anyone wishing to help prevent voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections, by demanding of county commissioners that they ban the use of vote counting machines such as Dominion and ES&S, in favor of hand counting ballots. Ballots are counted by hand in Germany, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, and at least 53 other countries.

Also high on the list of confidence-building safeguards against systemic election fraud is the public observation of the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, an area which was especially contentious in the 2020 presidential election.

In the 2020 report “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity: A Case Study of California’s Every Vote Counts Act,” a Stanford University Law School team recommends that election officials should:

“Ensure public observers have sufficient access to the signature verification process. Public observers must be allowed “sufficiently close access” to verify whether county officials are following established procedures for verifying whether ballot return ID envelope signatures match those in a voter’s registration file.”

This would mean that an observer from each political party would have “sufficiently close access” to discern whether a signature matched or not. Where there are questions, further contact with the voter by the election department is warranted.

The NM law professor, David Clements, of Las Cruces, says that voters can “save the country, by fixing their county.”

He urges citizens to confront their county election with clear demands to earn back the trust of voters in US elections, which is at an all-time low.

As controversy rages over mail-in voting, none other than Jimmy Carter has warned that large numbers of mail-in ballots are a recipe for mischief, saying:

“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.... MORE....

Professor David Clements Interview, pertinent remarks on elections at 4:00 minutes (view at Rumble)

And what is to stop GOP poll watchers being thrown out and the demrats pulling boxes of ballots out from under the table so to speak like we seen on tape in Fulton county GA in 2020?
 
And what is to stop GOP poll watchers being thrown out and the demrats pulling boxes of ballots out from under the table so to speak like we seen on tape in Fulton county GA in 2020?
Young, tall, strong Republican poll watchers who don't take shit from anyone.
 
I'm sorry a little scrutiny hurts their feelings, but if they don't want to be impugned, they should strive to do their jobs dutifully. If the electoral process is that sacrosanct, they need to make sure they give the public no room to criticize. They should make it so that not even one modicum of distrust is justified.
It is. And they do their jobs dutifully. Always have. Mail in voting and absentee voting have been used by states for decades,with no issues. Up until 2020 and all the sudden, the great orange one loses his bid for re-election and there is rampant fraud everywhere. Now, negatives must be proven. Why? Because the lie has been allowed to fester and there's enough of you rubes out there to keep it going.
Unfreakin real.
 
"Rubes"

You lost me there. And we were having such a polite conversation.

You have such blind faith in a process that you can't see the flaws. You refuse to.
Rube=You believe the lie. If you do. You sound sensible. Why do you believe there is rampant fraud in our elections? No proof of that exists.
And, I just gave you the point. There is fraud in every election. But not to the extent that it AFFECTS election outcomes. It didn't happen in
2016. It didn't happen in 2020.
 
Why do you believe there is rampant fraud in our elections?
I don't believe in 'rampant' fraud, well, not anymore.

I only believe in willful incompetence. A process carried out by individuals biased toward one party or the other. A belief that these people carry out the process dutifully and competently assumes that these people are devoid of thought, emotion, or personal preconceptions; furthermore assuming they can't be swayed by those things. That's you. Not me.
 

What You Can do to Prevent Election Fraud in November: Demand Full Local Signature-Matching of Mail-In Ballots, with Observers Present​

We need to have a "zombie watch" to prevent the dead Democrats from voting.
 
I don't believe in 'rampant' fraud, well, not anymore.

I only believe in willful incompetence. A process carried out by individuals biased toward one party or the other. A belief that these people carry out the process dutifully and competently assumes that these people are devoid of thought, emotion, or personal preconceptions; furthermore assuming they can't be swayed by those things. That's you. Not me.
But there's no evidence of willful incompetence. These are public servants. Even though they identify with a party, their belief is the process is part of our country's time honored tradition. And they bend over backwards to make sure the process is above reproach. And I say this as knowing both Republican and Democrat election officials and poll watchers.

The question you need to ask here is, "Why did this become an issue in 2020? When it wasn't an issue before?".
 

Forum List

Back
Top