What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[Missouri_Mike]

It's a medical matter between a woman and her doctor, and none of your business.

My doctor and I decided I can drive up to Canada and kill you. It’s between me and him and not any of your business.

 

[francoHFW]

When does life begin?

The supreme Court says after three or four months. I don't obsess about it, I'm not a fanatic or a fundamentalist...

 

[Dragonlady]

My doctor and I decided I can drive up to Canada and kill you. It’s between me and him and not any of your business.

An absolutely idiotic response from an absolute idiot. Why did you even bother to post it?

What gives you the right to decide how many children a woman should have? Or whether now is the right time to even have a child?

No woman’s life has ever been improved by forcing her to have a child she can neither afford, or otherwise cannot care for.

Unwanted children end up in jail. Unwanted children end up as failures in life. A child is entitled to more than an existence. A child is entitled to a family that can care for them and who cherishes him or her. All children should have that. Otherwise they do not thrive.

 

[themirrorthief]

Are you prepared to allow the government to help the mothers that can't afford those babies? I doubt it. "Lol fuck you. Shoulda kept your legs closed, slut."

if u dont want a baby stay out of bars full of horny losers

 

[themirrorthief]

If you believe in that sort of thing, aren't you doing the fetus a favor by aborting it since the soul would go straight to heaven?

u stupid bible thumping asshole u prob think biden isnt a senile old tool too

 

[themirrorthief]

An absolutely idiotic response from an absolute idiot. Why did you even bother to post it?

What gives you the right to decide how many children a woman should have? Or whether now is the right time to even have a child?

No woman’s life has ever been improved by forcing her to have a child she can neither afford, or otherwise cannot care for.

Unwanted children end up in jail. Unwanted children end up as failures in life. A child is entitled to more than an existence. A child is entitled to a family that can care for them and who cherishes him or her. All children should have that. Otherwise they do not thrive.

fucking leads to babies why cant women figure that out

 

[Lysistrata]

This whole "pro-life" thing is political bullshit. Notice how these "pro-lifers" want to protect themselves from the already-born people who are suffering. Notice how many of them want to arm themselves with guns to fight off the people who are in dire need of their help. Those who are "pro-life" are, in actuality, very few. The others want to keep great guns to ward the needy off, so "Christian." Some folks take care to leave water in the desert for those who might die of thirst, and other folks come after with guns to dump the water on the ground and let human beings die.

 

[BrokeLoser]

An absolutely idiotic response from an absolute idiot. Why did you even bother to post it?

What gives you the right to decide how many children a woman should have? Or whether now is the right time to even have a child?

No woman’s life has ever been improved by forcing her to have a child she can neither afford, or otherwise cannot care for.

Unwanted children end up in jail. Unwanted children end up as failures in life. A child is entitled to more than an existence. A child is entitled to a family that can care for them and who cherishes him or her. All children should have that. Otherwise they do not thrive.

YES...thrive or die...we should be killing our homeless populations...right?

 

[Votto]

No, sex is a biological imperative like sleep or food.
Without sex, the body deliberately induces constant pain.
It won't kill you, but it will drive you crazy.
So sex is not optional.
And a fetus is not a life yet.
It does not at all care what you do to it.
And adding another mouth to feed is not a good idea necessarily.

Wait...........wut?

Where are you getting this Mr. Science man?

 

[Votto]

This whole "pro-life" thing is political bullshit. Notice how these "pro-lifers" want to protect themselves from the already-born people who are suffering. Notice how many of them want to arm themselves with guns to fight off the people who are in dire need of their help. Those who are "pro-life" are, in actuality, very few. The others want to keep great guns to ward the needy off, so "Christian." Some folks take care to leave water in the desert for those who might die of thirst, and other folks come after with guns to dump the water on the ground and let human beings die.

Conservatives want to protect the innocent and defenseless.

This means protecting the unborn, and putting to death those that murder.

It's not rocket science.

But Leftists want to kill the innocent unborn and protect murderers so they can continue killing.

And judging by the cities they run, they have perfected those killing fields

 

[Votto]

It's a medical matter between a woman and her doctor, and none of your business.

When taxpayers are funding abortion, that makes it our business

 

[initforme]

A declining birthrate due to less women choosing to have kids is a win all the way around for the country. When an increasing number of women are choosing careers over families, more and more will take the proper steps to ensure they can't conceive. A positive trend towards less abortions.

 

[CowboyTed]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

I tell you, you posted "Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception"...

Please consistent...

When are you asking for the banning of IVF clinics?

How much longer will IVF clinics be tolerated?

How should we treat these 'murder babies' that were born from IVF?

If a baby is born due to being conceived in an IVF should the baby be allowed US Citizenship?

 

[CowboyTed]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Want less abortion... How about help with the burden of childcare:

• Compulsory maternity leave for both parents (Sweden is 13 months with a min of 3 months by both parents)
• Optional as a right Paternity leave (work four day week for 80% pay)
• Subsidised Childcare
• Better Schools
• Free College

 

[Dragonlady]

When taxpayers are funding abortion, that makes it our business

No it does not - any more than any other medical procedure you're funding.

 

[danielpalos]

What do you think of vaccination mandates?

The end should justify the means. We have a pandemic going on.

 

[danielpalos]

This one is untested long term. And is for something you have just a .007% chance of dying from.

Issues with vaccination are even rarer than that. Cognitive dissonance much, right-wing contrarians without a Cause?

 

[danielpalos]

When does life begin?

Better contraception at lower cost!

 

[danielpalos]

My doctor and I decided I can drive up to Canada and kill you. It’s between me and him and not any of your business.

Proof, right-wingers are just hypocrites regarding natural rights.

 

[danielpalos]

u stupid bible thumping asshole u prob think biden isnt a senile old tool too

Right-wingers probably think they have some "gospel Truth" instead of the, just plain immorality of false witness bearing.