Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision

" Perceptions For Sick Expectations "

* Knot Guilty As Intended *

If you don't see it, then you are part of it.
Then eye suppose to seeing it and to being a part of it .

The unusual challenges to legal ethics by the convicted murderer was presented in this thread as a sick joke .
 
" Frame Of References Are Useful As Abortion Choice Legal Teams Practiced Incompetence "

* Chief Justice Needs To Be Spoon Fed Logically Of Course By Blackmun From #RoeVWade *

Who wrote the above nonsense?
The awl eat toe wrote it as justification for sedition of us 14th , 9th and 1st in #dobbs dumbfounded decision .

Under this scheme, each trimester of pregnancy was regulated differently, but the most critical line was drawn at roughly the end of the second trimester, which, at the time, corresponded to the point at which a fetus was thought to achieve “viability,” i.e., the ability to survive outside the womb. Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,”1 it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on previability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. One prominent constitutional scholar wrote that he “would vote for a statute very much like the one the Court end[ed] up drafting” if he were “a legislator,” but his assessment of Roe was memorable and brutal: Roe was “not constitutional law” at all and gave “almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”2


 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top