Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision

[Monk-Eye]

" Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision "

* Opening Post Circumstance As A Premise Of Contention *

Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'

James Kopp, an anti-abortion activist who murdered an abortion provider, contends that a conviction should be tossed because of the SCOTUS decision that overturned Roe versus Wade.

www.yahoo.com

Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'​

James Charles Kopp, a radical anti-abortion activist who in 1998 murdered a western New York abortion provider, contends that his federal convictions should be dismissed because of the year-old Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe versus Wade.
...
"FACE was intended to protect a 'right' to abortion that thus never existed, and, as such, the fate of FACE attaches to and follows perfectly the fate of Roe," Kopp wrote in the court papers. "Since Roe is now overturned FACE also is now gone and never existed."

FACE, however, still exists and is enforced.


* Perspective Premise On Contention Is That Roe V Wade Is Not Over Ruled By Set Aside By Sedition Of Us 14th 9th 1st Amendments *

#Dobbs is #DumbFounded and #SeditionLaw against US 14th , 9th and 1st amendments .

@ReproRights presented an INEPT WRIGHT TO PRIVACY premise and NOT A LIVE BIRTH premise of #RoeVWade , that is clear from alito response !

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. "

None should need to explain a " Logically , of course " deduction by us constitution to a supreme court justice !

Blackmun wrote in RoeVWade , " Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth. "

Thus , at post natural viability , an ability to survive an imminent live birth was substituted In lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , which was referenced as a " potential life " .

That is , except for a live birth requirement , all circumstances to become a US citizen are incidental .

So , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .

So , in US 10th , by US 14th and by US 9th , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .

Any US citizen has legal standing to prevail against state interests to proscribe abortion as a violation of the equal protection clause of US 14th amendment .

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

usmessageboard.com

* Rebuttal To Claimant Seeking Dismissal Of Murder Charges *

By equitable doctrine , where an individual removes a wright to life of another individual as defines murder , a potential exists where the wright to life of the murderer could be removed , albeit by due process .

As a zygote , or embryo , or fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , each is without constitutional protections , and it therefore not possible to have removed a wright to life , by which to enforce a death penalty as capital punishment , such that the petition to dismiss murder charges is dismissed .

That yearn zealous fervor for martyrdom through homicide , based on ignorance for the dumbfounded , is pitiful .

#AbortionChoice , #AbortionChoiceRepublicans , #ProChoiceRepublicans , #RoeVWade.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Murder is still murder (of an adult).

Don't get this one.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Murder is still murder (of an adult). •••• Don't get this one.

From the link:

In court papers filed this month, Kopp claims that the (2022) Supreme Court ruling proves that "the constitutional right to an abortion does not exist and never did." •••• He also alleges that he was denied in federal court the right to justify his crimes with a defense based on "the humanity of womb children."​

Kopp was in the antiabortion “Saving Baby Fetus” cult movement and was described as a devout Catholic by others in the cult.

Kopp is serving a life sentence because he thought he could murder doctors to save the humanity of womb children.

Kopp has never been a rational human being and now he is citing the most irrational and unconstitutional SCOTUS decision of them all., DOBBS that decided "the constitutional right to an abortion does not exist

Sorta like what you said:

1. There is no such right (to avoid physical harm).

It is neither moral, factual or rational to say that women do not have, as a minimum, an unenumerated constitutional right to anticipate the risk of harm or death to her body and seek a medical procedure that will end it.

hkrgy.23.06.29 #2
hkrgy.23.06.25 #9,217
nf.23.06.30 #3

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision "

* Opening Post Circumstance As A Premise Of Contention *

Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'

James Kopp, an anti-abortion activist who murdered an abortion provider, contends that a conviction should be tossed because of the SCOTUS decision that overturned Roe versus Wade.

www.yahoo.com

Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'​

James Charles Kopp, a radical anti-abortion activist who in 1998 murdered a western New York abortion provider, contends that his federal convictions should be dismissed because of the year-old Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe versus Wade.
...
"FACE was intended to protect a 'right' to abortion that thus never existed, and, as such, the fate of FACE attaches to and follows perfectly the fate of Roe," Kopp wrote in the court papers. "Since Roe is now overturned FACE also is now gone and never existed."

FACE, however, still exists and is enforced.


* Perspective Premise On Contention Is That Roe V Wade Is Not Over Ruled By Set Aside By Sedition Of Us 14th 9th 1st Amendments *

#Dobbs is #DumbFounded and #SeditionLaw against US 14th , 9th and 1st amendments .

@ReproRights presented an INEPT WRIGHT TO PRIVACY premise and NOT A LIVE BIRTH premise of #RoeVWade , that is clear from alito response !

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. "

None should need to explain a " Logically , of course " deduction by us constitution to a supreme court justice !

Blackmun wrote in RoeVWade , " Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth. "

Thus , at post natural viability , an ability to survive an imminent live birth was substituted In lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , which was referenced as a " potential life " .

That is , except for a live birth requirement , all circumstances to become a US citizen are incidental .

So , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .

So , in US 10th , by US 14th and by US 9th , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .

Any US citizen has legal standing to prevail against state interests to proscribe abortion as a violation of the equal protection clause of US 14th amendment .

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

usmessageboard.com

* Rebuttal To Claimant Seeking Dismissal Of Murder Charges *

By equitable doctrine , where an individual removes a wright to life of another individual as defines murder , a potential exists where the wright to life of the murderer could be removed , albeit by due process .

As a zygote , or embryo , or fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , each is without constitutional protections , and it therefore not possible to have removed a wright to life , by which to enforce a death penalty as capital punishment , such that the petition to dismiss murder charges is dismissed .

That yearn zealous fervor for martyrdom through homicide , based on ignorance for the dumbfounded , is pitiful .

#AbortionChoice , #AbortionChoiceRepublicans , #ProChoiceRepublicans , #RoeVWade.

The OP is a sick joke.

 

[HikerGuy83]

It is neither moral, factual or rational to say that women do not have, as a minimum, an unenumerated constitutional right to anticipate the risk of harm or death to her body and seek a medical procedure that will end it.

hkrgy.23.06.29 #2
hkrgy.23.06.25 #9,217
nf.23.06.30 #3

Law does not concern itself with morals.

Rational is a matter of opinion.

Factual......sorry.....it seems that SCOTUS does not agree with you.

Again (and last time), I am not for/against abortion.

I entered this conversation about the legal approach to it.

I can't get past your need to take this approach that essentially says that you are the final arbiter in the discussion.

You are not and we are through.

 

[BackAgain]

Murder is still murder (of an adult).

Don't get this one.

Nothing to get. The OP went around the bend. Hopelessly lost, ever since.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Law does not concern itself with morals.

Rational is a matter of opinion.

Factual......sorry.....it seems that SCOTUS does not agree with you.

Again (and last time), I am not for/against abortion.

I entered this conversation about the legal approach to it.

I can't get past your need to take this approach that essentially says that you are the final arbiter in the discussion.

You are not and we are through.

You are wrong. A woman has the right to make her medical decisions. That SCOTUS got it wrong is immaterial.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You are wrong. A woman has the right to make her medical decisions. That SCOTUS got it wrong is immaterial.

I'll call them right after I finish this post and let them know that they got it wrong.

I am sure they'll get right on it.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

I can't get past your need to take this approach that essentially says that you are the final arbiter in the discussion.

Young voters will have the final say in the discussion:

Cardona said the student debt forgiveness the Biden administration pushed for would have provided relief to 43 million people including 50 percent of Latino students and 40 percent of Black students. •••• “And for Black and Latino families, that would have been a game changer, not just for their families, but for their generation,” Cardona said.​

'I can already see the ads being written': Analyst says GOP will face blowback over SCOTUS rulings

A CNN political analyst said Friday that the Supreme Court’s recent rulings are likely to fuel blowback for Republicans. Democratic strategist Maria Cardona said the student loan forgiveness decision in particular is likely to motivate young Democratic voters in the 2024 election cycle. “…...

www.rawstory.com

​

They are not looking too kindly to Trump’s white Christian nationalists favoring Catholic dominated Supremes who are;

Getting into young people’s bedroom business

and

Paying Back with favoritism to the business yacht and Lear Jet billionaire class and the morals majority authoritarians who sent them there., under the Republican MAGA banner.

​

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

You are wrong. A woman has the right to make her medical decisions.

Contract killing isn’t a “medical decision,” moron.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

The FACE Act is First Amendment violating unconstitutional garbage and should be overturned. It’s none of the feds business and it is absolutely based on the insane premise that Roe concocted from whole cloth.

Hope this goes to SCOTUS, he should win.

Don’t worry, the abortionist piece of shit he killed was just a clump of cells - hopefully he gets released as well. He’s not a danger to any people.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Don’t worry, the abortionist piece of shit he killed was just a clump of cells - hopefully he gets released as well. He’s not a danger to any people.

Holy Fuck!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Contract killing isn’t a “medical decision,” moron.

You sound goofy.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Holy Fuck!

Yeah, that was awesome satire.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Contract killing isn’t a “medical decision,” moron.

MIss Texas is young and relevant to the future of restoring the human rights that your hate-infested, backwards looking, ignorance based, Baby Fetus Saving and gun worshipping cult court is trying to repress. •••• Bishop’s reign as Miss Texas will end this weekend when a new pageant winner is crowned. •••• But Bishop plans to run for the state legislature in the next few years. •••• “We are literally pushed to our wits’ end,” Bishop said of young Texans.​

​

Miss Texas takes on stateâs GOP: report

Texas Democrats haven’t won a statewide election in nearly 30 years since Ann Richards was elected governor in 1994.But an improbable bulwark has emerged against conservative excesses in a ruby red state that's experiencing a seismic demographic shift.Averie Bishop, who last year won the Miss...

www.rawstory.com

​

Nothing to get.

don’t count on it - bckvgn

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Holy Fuck!

What?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Says Hue "

* Specific Interrogative Not Rendered *

The OP is a sick joke.

The activist and its claims are realities .

The OP is a broad reference , was there anything in particular which presents itself as a sick joke ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Says Hue "

* Specific Interrogative Not Rendered *

The activist and its claims are realities .

The OP is a broad reference , was there anything in particular which presents itself as a sick joke ?

If you don't see it, then you are part of it.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Abortion Focus Confused By Extant Blankets "

* Apply Negative Positive Wrights Liberties Protections Endowments And Principles Of Non Violence And Individualism *

MIss Texas is young and relevant to the future of restoring the human rights that your hate-infested, backwards looking, ignorance based, Baby Fetus Saving and gun worshipping cult court is trying to repress.​

Any pretenses for disarming or dispossessing us public of weapons . is absent of causation and consequence , as an armed society is a peaceful society , as an ability to protect oneself in all 360 degrees , as multiple others render perceptions for who is initiating illegitimate aggression , is to remain not assured .

* Traitorous Support For #dobbs Sedition Allusion To Not Addressed Dumbfounded Ignorance *

The sedition of #dobbs occurred because the abortion choice trope mumbled and fumbled with an incompetent premise that an entitlement to abortion was based on a wright to privacy , and alito was not presented with a modicum of address for the actual constitutional basis for #roevwade decision , which is a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , where at post natural viability an ability to survive an imminent live birth was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement , which the roe court referred to as a potential life .

The alito directly addressed the incompetence of the abortion choice legal arguments in #dobbs .

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

Under this scheme, each trimester of pregnancy was regulated differently, but the most critical line was drawn at roughly the end of the second trimester, which, at the time, corresponded to the point at which a fetus was thought to achieve “viability,” i.e., the ability to survive outside the womb. Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,”1 it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on previability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. One prominent constitutional scholar wrote that he “would vote for a statute very much like the one the Court end[ed] up drafting” if he were “a legislator,” but his assessment of Roe was memorable and brutal: Roe was “not constitutional law” at all and gave “almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”2


A wright to privacy in not principle to the constitutional basis for abortion , or for #roevwade , and the abortion choice trope remained complacent , dismissive , arrogant and woefully ignorant for a modicum of understanding for equitable doctrine and live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen that si the foundation of #roevwade and for the legality of abortion .

States are prohibited in us 10th amendment , by us 14th amendment , from protecting a wright to life of any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , that is founded in principles of equitable doctrine and equal protection of negative liberties among individuals .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Who wrote the above nonsense?