What law(s) would have stopped the Buffalo shooting?

Can you tell me the exact time and location and how many will die when and where the next racist goes off?

Your dwelling on statistics won’t matter one bit to the next dead, wounded and survivors just as they don’t matter in Buffalo. You are a callous soul when you tout stats for an excuse to keep going on with your hobby.


You mean when the next leftist goes off......the Buffalo shooter was a leftist authoritarian...by his own writings...who hated Fox news, never mentioned Tucker, and hated conservatives......
 
They vote you ignorant jackass and in very large numbers and vote for people they think will further their own interests rather than those of the country as a whole.



Ring any bells you ignorant twit?

Tjey vote for middle class twits, like you, dumbass. lol you really need to give up the booze; it's already killed most of your brain cells.
 
A separate viable human life is not developed without the support of a viable human’s body. The woman carrying a fertilized egg has a right to decide what happens inside her body. The scientists can prove the process of potential biological life begins at conception but nothing more than that.,

Now when certain religion is intertwined with a woman the choice to terminate a zygot may not be an option.



AMERICANS HAVE FREEDOM OF AND FROM RELIGION and therefore a woman has a right to privacy regarding pregnancy until such time that she carries a viable human life.



What lies and what racism are you referring to?
What does this have to do with the shooting?
 
Do you fear the word viable.

I’m not advocating killing an unborn ‘child” a zygote is not a child.


YOU MADE A FALSE STATEMENT THAT THE CONSTITUTION Protects the fertilized egg. it does not. AMERICANS BECOME CITIZENS AT BIRTH NOt AT CONCEPTION . DO YIU ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT YOU CAN BE WRONG?
How long has the Constitution been around VS Man, Dumbass?

Why do you think the Constitution determines when life begins?
 
What does this have to do with the shooting?
Republicans fight so hard for the unborn but don’t seem to give a rats ass for the born and viable non-white’s right to life in the pursuit of happiness guaranteed under the Constitution. It’s as if Republicans are only interested in making sure they have plenty of potential white gun owners in the future. Why is it that only House REP Liz CHENEY CALLS OUT Republican failure to address white Supremacists armed to the teeth to commit mass murder.

“The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse.”​
 
Republicans fight so hard for the unborn but don’t seem to give a rats ass for the born and viable non-white’s right to life in the pursuit of happiness guaranteed under the Constitution. It’s as if Republicans are only interested in making sure they have plenty of potential white gun owners in the future. Why is it that only House REP Liz CHENEY CALLS OUT Republican failure to address white Supremacists armed to the teeth to commit mass murder.

“The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse.”​


And that is the bullshit you idiots tell yourselves to justify killing babies......

The democrat party is the party of racism....Republicans had to end slavery, protect the freed blacks from democrats, and push Civil Rights.......now, the democrats keep lying about that history...
 
I don’t. Why are you such a dumb ass asking dumb ass questions and not addressing the point that was made
The discussion is about when life begins, and you brought up the Constitution and when someone is considered a citizen, Dumbass.
 
Maybe a more intense look at people buying any gun that can kill masses of people in seconds? Hunters and sport shooters do not need 100s of bullets' to shoot a deer or target practice. Not the guns fault that people think its cool to carry at Walmart.
 
Maybe a more intense look at people buying any gun that can kill masses of people in seconds? Hunters and sport shooters do not need 100s of bullets' to shoot a deer or target practice. Not the guns fault that people think its cool to carry at Walmart.
The 2nd Amendment isn't about hunting.
 
My son showed me the livestream video the shooter made.

I am not a big fan of capital punishment, but that fucker should be executed post haste.

By firing squad.
 
Republicans fight so hard for the unborn but don’t seem to give a rats ass for the born and viable non-white’s right to life in the pursuit of happiness guaranteed under the Constitution. It’s as if Republicans are only interested in making sure they have plenty of potential white gun owners in the future. Why is it that only House REP Liz CHENEY CALLS OUT Republican failure to address white Supremacists armed to the teeth to commit mass murder.

“The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse.”​
In other words it has nothing to do with the discussion? Here something more closer to the discussion.
No one cares about your Whinning. We had 5 years of democrat hate and violence pushed by CBS NBC ABC CNN MSNBC wapo and other leftists run media and democrat elected officials, sooner or later it was going to happen. It's going to continue so I say fuck you enjoy your creation
 
Personally I'd start by banning murdering folks and once that's done move on to more specifics.


You would think that by now they would have created a law that makes shooting people to death illegal.......they should really get on that...
 
Alex I'll take what is the second amendment for a $1000.

The 2nd amendment, like the entire rest of the Bill of Rights, was only intended to prevent federal jurisdiction.
Sure there ARE individual rights, but the Founders were just trying to start to create a country at all, by getting the states to sign on. So they were totally unwilling to risk all that by making states wary of them being over ruled by federal protection of individual rights.
For example, if the Bill of Rights had ended slavery, then likely the US would never have existed.
The South would have not signed on, they would have sided with the British in the war of 1812, and we would have lost.
 

What law(s) would have stopped the Buffalo shooting?​


Outlawing guns, obviously.

Shooter can't rampage a grocery store without a gun.

Wrong.
We outlaw drugs and that increased their abundance.
Those intend on murder are never going to be deterred by a lesser gun law penalty.
 
Then you will have blood on your hands. You already do! When did you people ever compromise?

It is wrong to try to compromise with someone who wants to disarm the entire population except for the mercenaries of the wealthy elite, like police and military.
That is not just suicidal, but incredibly irresponsible because it ensure a long lasting dictatorship imposes on our descendants, perhaps forever.
 
Republicans fight so hard for the unborn but don’t seem to give a rats ass for the born and viable non-white’s right to life in the pursuit of happiness guaranteed under the Constitution. It’s as if Republicans are only interested in making sure they have plenty of potential white gun owners in the future. Why is it that only House REP Liz CHENEY CALLS OUT Republican failure to address white Supremacists armed to the teeth to commit mass murder.

“The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse.”​
Gee, the constitution only guarantees you the "pursuit" of happiness. There is no guarantee "of happiness".
 
And thus, your inability to demonstrate the necessary relationship between the gun control laws of those 'other countries' and their lower rates of mass shootings.
I accept your concession.

But I disagree there is any correlation at all "between the gun control laws of those 'other countries' and their lower rates of mass shootings".

The reason most countries have much happier people who commit fewer crimes, is because they have better health care, educational opportunities, job opportunities, housing access, etc. They do not have as many unfair taxes that go to fund illegal foreign wars.
So there is absolutely no functional correlation between restrictive gun laws and gun murders.

The claim other countries have stronger gun control laws is just a myth and wrong.
In almost any other country, almost anyone can easily get and own a gun legally.
The fact you have to register, join a gun club, or have some reasonable need, is irrelevant.
The fact is it is not at all hard to do.
The hardest in the world is Japan, and it is still not that hard.
{...
These steps include:
  • Written test, only offered on certain dates.
  • Psychiatric evaulation.
  • Drug test.
  • Criminal background check.
  • Gun skills competency test.
...}
There are over 1 million private guns in Japan.
They can be for security, or just for a collector.
 

Forum List

Back
Top