Aquarian
Member
- Oct 16, 2003
- 440
- 2
- 16
The bible teaches many things. Some people accept all the lessons, some only a portion, some few or none. I thought I might take a moment to list the lessons I've taken to heart (some with caveats). I'll not be talking about the ones I have reservations about in this thread, just the ones I'm attempting to incorporate into my life.
"Judge not, lest ye be judged."
This, along with "vengeance is mine, sayeth the lord", is one I try to follow. It's not easy to do all the time, especially when cut off in traffic. I also make allowances for earthly judgements to be passed on those who would try to or have cut short the earthly stay of others altho I balk at the ultimate punishment as a general rule.
"As you do unto the least among you, so you do unto me"
As said by Jesus. This one seems straightforward, treat every single person with the same respect that you would Jesus himself. But perhaps it's not as cleancut as that. For instance, how would you follow this principle in regards to a pathological killer? Certainly, you wouldn't lock jesus up in a mental ward, would you? Well, maybe you'd have to. Maybe, if Jesus chose to appear as a killer, the proper course would be to restrain him and attempt treatment in as humane a way as possible. Dunno, this one can make the brain hurt at times...
Thou shalt not kill
Another clear message seemingly. Doesn't really leave much leeway when written that way. On the other hand, there is question as to the actual meaning of the hebrew word used in the original "ratsach", whether it was the word for kill or murder. I don't have on hand the references, but from what I've read, translated one way forbids all taking of life period, no exceptions (kill) whereas the other way (murder) was a more specific kind of killing that was forbidden. We all draw the line somewhere, but theoretically there can be only one right answer. Where does that line belong, what types of killing might be ok? self-defense, defense of country, defense of others, etc. There are those amongst us who are willing to 'turn the other cheek' no matter how grave the offense, but it is clear that others who are not.
Thou Shalt not steal
Generally a good one, but in times of hunger I don't think I'd have any problem reverting to Harlan Ellison's rules on property ownership: "If it's not nailed down, it's mine. If it was nailed down, but I can pry it loose, it wasn't nailed down properly to begin with and therefor is mine" (from memory, apologies to Mr Ellison if i've gotten it wrong)
I'll stop there and see if I've gone around the bend in thinking this would be a good thing to discuss here or not based on the comments received...
"Judge not, lest ye be judged."
This, along with "vengeance is mine, sayeth the lord", is one I try to follow. It's not easy to do all the time, especially when cut off in traffic. I also make allowances for earthly judgements to be passed on those who would try to or have cut short the earthly stay of others altho I balk at the ultimate punishment as a general rule.
"As you do unto the least among you, so you do unto me"
As said by Jesus. This one seems straightforward, treat every single person with the same respect that you would Jesus himself. But perhaps it's not as cleancut as that. For instance, how would you follow this principle in regards to a pathological killer? Certainly, you wouldn't lock jesus up in a mental ward, would you? Well, maybe you'd have to. Maybe, if Jesus chose to appear as a killer, the proper course would be to restrain him and attempt treatment in as humane a way as possible. Dunno, this one can make the brain hurt at times...
Thou shalt not kill
Another clear message seemingly. Doesn't really leave much leeway when written that way. On the other hand, there is question as to the actual meaning of the hebrew word used in the original "ratsach", whether it was the word for kill or murder. I don't have on hand the references, but from what I've read, translated one way forbids all taking of life period, no exceptions (kill) whereas the other way (murder) was a more specific kind of killing that was forbidden. We all draw the line somewhere, but theoretically there can be only one right answer. Where does that line belong, what types of killing might be ok? self-defense, defense of country, defense of others, etc. There are those amongst us who are willing to 'turn the other cheek' no matter how grave the offense, but it is clear that others who are not.
Thou Shalt not steal
Generally a good one, but in times of hunger I don't think I'd have any problem reverting to Harlan Ellison's rules on property ownership: "If it's not nailed down, it's mine. If it was nailed down, but I can pry it loose, it wasn't nailed down properly to begin with and therefor is mine" (from memory, apologies to Mr Ellison if i've gotten it wrong)
I'll stop there and see if I've gone around the bend in thinking this would be a good thing to discuss here or not based on the comments received...