Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
Think this is very interesting:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A7223-2004Feb2¬Found=true
So what are the issues, according to the writer?
I added the explanation on biotech, for the simple reason that I know some think the Church is anti-science, which is not the case. The questioning comes from the teachings on 'life' and the reasoning behind 'unintended consequences.'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A7223-2004Feb2¬Found=true
A Crossroad for the Catholic Church
By George Weigel
Tuesday, February 3, 2004; Page A19
What "issues" will frame the election to choose a successor to Pope John Paul II? Chances are they're not what you might think.
Consider, for example, what are often reported as the most controversial matters in the pontificate of John Paul II: abortion, homosexuality and ordination of women to the priesthood. The assumption is that, in the next conclave, the cardinal-electors will sort themselves out in conventional "conservative" and "liberal" camps around these questions. In fact, it won't work that way. John Paul II hasn't been teaching the personal opinions of Karol Wojtyla on these matters, he's been teaching the settled doctrine of the Catholic Church. That doctrine isn't going to change in the next pontificate, or in the 10 pontificates after that, because popes are the servants of doctrine, not its masters. What are frequently thought to be "the issues" in the next conclave aren't issues at all...
So what are the issues, according to the writer?
1. Collapsing Catholicism in Europe
2. Radical Islam
3. Biotechnology. The Catholic Church welcomes the new genetic knowledge and its capacity to advance the arts of healing. The Catholic Church also teaches that attempts to remanufacture the human condition by manufacturing (or retrofitting) human beings end up dehumanizing us. How to shape the global debate about the new biotechnologies so that humanity gets to the 22nd century without finding itself ensnared in Aldous Huxley's brave new world is a mega-issue bearing hard on the next conclave...
I added the explanation on biotech, for the simple reason that I know some think the Church is anti-science, which is not the case. The questioning comes from the teachings on 'life' and the reasoning behind 'unintended consequences.'