Zone1 What is Wrong with Inequality?

MAGA opposes minimum wage, unions, worker safety, healthcare, worker benefits

They have sold out to the wealthy
Minimum wage has negatively distorted economies, unions are disastrous, safety is important, health care is important hence why it's better in the UK, it's easy to give benefits and hard to take them away but everyone should by law experience self employment for 5 years after leaving school so there wouldn't be so many entitled arsehole employees in the workplace.

Tell me how someone got poor because someone got wealthy? I would like one of the anti-wealthy to explain their logic.
 
Last edited:
In before: Yes it hurts society because we cannot seize your assets and redistribute them. For good purposes of course.
The left’s sense of entitlement to other people’s money is unreal. Instead of thinking, “what can I do with my life to make sure I earn enough to live comfortably?,” they think “how can I get my hands on the money of people who DID do what was responsible and wise to earn enough to live comfortably.”
 
No limit on your earnings, only limits on how much you can leave for you kids. If you're over that limit do what Bill Gates did, spend some and give some to charity.
"Prep" School Means "Prepare" for College, an Obsolete Aristocratic Institution

Gates's charity is anti-American. His attitude is that Third Worlders don't have the chance of getting ahead that we have. He thinks everybody here is in the place they deserve.

He's a big hero to the ignorant High IQs. So why doesn't he propose that inheritances give them the same lifestyle in college that his own birth-class has? Paid-up tuition and what is far more important, an adult allowance.
 
Minimum wage has negatively distorted economies, unions as disastrous, safety is important, health care is important hence why it's better in the UK, it's easy to give benefits and hard to take them away but everyone should by law experience self employment for 5 years after leaving school so there wouldn't be so many entitled arsehole employees in the workplace.

Tell me how someone got poor because someone got wealthy? I would like one of the anti-wealthy to explain their logic.
Thanks for confirming my point
 
The MW also should be adjusted according to region, the same way the GS scale is.
The marketplace does that. They are going to pay what the job market demands. Glassdoor.com also has salary comparisons by area and have done that since before I retired over ten years ago.
 
Thanks for confirming my point
You said -

MAGA opposes minimum wage, unions, worker safety, healthcare, worker benefits.

I'm UK, Maga is some kind of American petty squabble. So I confirmed your point that I agreed with some and didn't agree with others? Do you even know what you're writing :dunno:

You didn't answer the question.
 
Last edited:
The Government already taxed you when you were making your fortune...why should they have the right to tax that AGAIN just because you died? They didn't do anything to EARN that money!
Chameleon Rhetoric

Notice how Pretty Preppyboy JFK bloviated, "Ask not what your country (= the government) can do for you; ask what you can do for your country (= the American people).

The heirs are the real grave-robbers. Their Daddies have no right to enable that. It shows he feels no responsibility to society and a level playing field. He may have gotten rich fair and square, but he obviously doesn't believe in that.
 
Chameleon Rhetoric

Notice how Pretty Preppyboy JFK bloviated, "Ask not what your country (= the government) can do for you; ask what you can do for your country (= the American people).
JFK said "ask what you can do for your country."

Not Government will let you keep what we feel is enough of your earnings and redistribute the rest for your country.
 
Yep. They want the unmotivated to have the same as the driven…..the lazy to have the same as the hard workers….the below-average to have the same as the intelligent…..the irresponsible to have the same as the conscientious.

There’s no incentive to even try if the socialists are just going to equitize you.
You mix in birth and brown-nosing with worth.
 
You mix in birth and brown-nosing with worth.
No I don’t. Stop looking at what other people inherit, and just focus on making your life as comfortable as possible. You’re not entitled to OPM.

Comparison is the thief of joy.
 
I agree….but there’s got to be a compromise.

The MW also should be adjusted according to region, the same way the GS scale is.
You don't have to (and should really never try!) to legislate a Minimum Wage...that's something that will take care of itself and always has. Competition means that good employees are sought after and paid a higher wage. What you see as "compromise" is simply Government attempting to be "fair" (and I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they mean well) yet in doing so they end up intruding on a free market system that regulates itself and that intrusion almost always gives negative results.
 
Oinkonomics

This little piggy went to market, which is a paradise for plutocratic preppy parasites. Only employees should get dividends, not absentee owners.
Employees get a paycheck and they receive that paycheck whether the company is making a profit or it isn't. The investors that risked capital to finance that company receive dividends if the company shows a profit. If it doesn't...then they don't make a thing. Why would employees get dividends when they haven't risked capital?
 
15th post
Yes they are…and corporations make a profit off of every one of those workers
Leftists Have Always Been a Fake Alternative to the Right Wing They Were Born In

Then why doesn't the blue-collar-hating snob Left ever define "take-home pay" as the difference between what the employee produces for the owners and what they pay him out of that?

The greatest Grand Larceny is corporate patents. The self-styled "educated party" never mentions how High IQ employee-inventors get screwed royal (royalty being the greatest hereditary tyranny of all).
 
I hate to break this to you, Winger but very few workers start their careers "educated" to do the job they'll be doing! There is almost always a training period during which the business is generally paying two people to do one job because the "trainee" needs to be taught how to do the job by first watching the trainer do it and then by having them watch as they do it! When I had a trainee? I seldom was making a profit off of them. It was costing me money. Money that I understood had to be spent if I wanted a competent staff but money that was spent without a guarantee that the trainee would work out.
Preparation Is the Most Important Part of Production

Opinionists who pretend to understand economics don't understand economic growth. Theory is static; activity is dynamic.
 
Leftists Have Always Been a Fake Alternative to the Right Wing They Were Born In

Then why doesn't the blue-collar-hating snob Left ever define "take-home pay" as the difference between what the employee produces for the owners and what they pay him out of that?
Because the Left doesn't want to fix anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom