Zone1 What is Wrong with Inequality?

Life isn't fair, I get it. I also feel children shouldn't suffer because of the failures of their parents.
So why aren't you forcing the parents to live up to their responsibilities instead of vilifying the responsible adults in this country?
 
What you’re asking is:

How does if benefit OTHER PEOPLE when a rich person leaves the money he earned to his kids?

The answer is: who says it has to? It’s the father’s money to do with what he wants.
Not how life works. I have enough money to build a really big bomb in my basement. Should you care if you live next door?
 
Dodge Charger

He was referring to inheritance, not earned income.

Having a country's economy, government, and culture run by lottery winners wouldn't be much different from what our system really is.
Why is someone amassing wealth through a life time of hard work and good decisions akin to "winning the lottery"? Why do YOU or anyone else have the right to declare that person shouldn't be able to determine where the wealth they created and paid taxes on as they were doing so...goes? You on the left are like a pack of Hyenas who don't make the kill but are more than willing to gang up on the lioness who did and steal what that lion worked to get. You can mask your greed in flowery rhetoric but at the end of the day you're just another Kleptoparasite stealing what you didn't work for!
 
I'm not talking about the people you want to STEAL the money from, Alang...I'm talking about the people you want to GIVE that money to! The left always talks about how people deserve a "living wage" and I'm just curious how much that's going to be in your "workers utopia"!
Only Suckers Believe in "RichKids on Our Side"

Strawman. If the common people controlled Liberalism instead of the Preppy Progressives from the HeirHead Harvard Hierarchy, they wouldn't give to it to lazy moochers. Only spoiled degenerates who are themselves Daddy-moochers have done that.
 
Only Suckers Believe in "RichKids on Our Side"

Strawman. If the common people controlled Liberalism instead of the Preppy Progressives from the HeirHead Harvard Hierarchy, they wouldn't give to it to lazy moochers. Only spoiled degenerates who are themselves Daddy-moochers have done that.
At this point...what is "Liberalism"? Do you even know anymore? The Democrat Party of today doesn't seem to!
 
If you don't have the money then you can't start-up or expand your business. They don't call it capitalism for nothing.
If there is a market for more sales and more profit you will find a way to get the money.

You do not expand just because you came across more money
 
A ladder of thorns? LOL A little melodramatic there, don't you think, Sage? The truth is...people are literally dying to get into the US so they can climb that ladder because the fact is...there are few places on earth where it's easier to become wildly successful than the US!
When Some People Are Allowed to Slide Uphill, the World Is Upside-Down


It wouldn't require extreme personal sacrifice if it weren't an easy elevator ride for those who make the rules for others on getting ahead.
 
Last edited:
I don't consider it stealing since this 2nd generation has done nothing to earn it.


That is up to the person who earned the money. If Bill Gates had only one child to give $10M to he'd have to decide what to do with the rest. He could put in his will to give to a university or a charity, build a pyramid or send his body to Mars. Or he could give it to a "workers utopia". It is money he earned so he gets to decide, except for hording it for his family (if he is married she gets it all until she dies).
You mean other than being the child of the person who DID and because of that should be able to bequeath that wealth to anyone they see fit...especially their own children? I grew up on a large farm. Should my father not have been able to pass that property to me at his demise?
 
15th post
Having enough money to break the law is not the same as breaking the law, moron. Wipe that crap off of your arm from reaching so far up your ass for that nonsense.
Semantics. Let's say I built a huge storage tank in my basement and filled it with gasoline.
 
Regardless of the impact on the rest of society? I consider an income of $500K/year as financial security since it puts you in the top 5% of US earners.
So now you're the authority on how much people should earn? How communistic of you, comrade.
 
Back
Top Bottom