ROTFLMFAO!
You sure know a lot of shady people!
So IM2 don't like most whites....this matters to you? I gotta say...I'm not threatened by him..nor do I think he intends me to be....You, on the other hand, feel threatened..and well you should be!
Your responses are quite telling..for those that want to look..I wonder if you really mean what you communicate to others..as to who you are..ethically?
I don't dislike most whites, I just don't like racist whites. And when a person says America was meant to be only for whites and the 14th amendment is illegal then he should not get pissy when he's called a white supremacist.
The history of this country don't change because you don't like the facts. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the reality is, America was founded for whites. Here is the
FIRST Naturalization law written only months after the ratification of the United States Constitution:
"
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least..."
Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795
Where in the HELL is there any
"racism" on my part? What I stated as FACT is both accurate and honest. Where is there any racism in an honest and accurate portrayal of the facts? Explain to us how a rendering of the facts is racist. IM2 is full of shit and you know it.
Second point: IM 2 knows damn well, my objections to the 14th Amendment are
NOT predicated on race. My objections to the 14th Amendment are predicated on the fact that the 14th Amendment ultimately
nullified the Bill of Rights. AND that is
not my opinion. I can show you how, when applied in the context of gun Rights, the courts gradually eliminated gun Rights and ended up (under a
conservative Court I might add), saying that the government grants you your "
rights." And that, sir, is the antithesis of an
unalienable Right. There is not a damn thing racist about it.
I don't like whataboutism; however, any person that is not black cannot make the racist statements you do in any place in America. There was a Chinese girl on tv a couple of days ago, accused of racism and stripped of her beauty pageant title and kicked out of her sorority for a lot less IM2 gets away with here. Just because I don't kiss his ass does not make me a racist. IM2 is the lowest form of life on earth.
I've gotten pissy because some of us are more equal than others. What IM2 says would get any other race of person banned and removed from this society.
I have no problem with the facts. The facts show that America was built upon a foundation of white supremacy. It is that white supremacy you want to return to. Yet you start crying because you get called a white supremacist. The first naturalization laws excluded people who were already here. The fact that it was racist is undisputed and that's why it's no longer the law.
Your opposition to the 14th amendment is based on race but you try using the claim that it nullified the bill of rights. First off you ignore the fact that the unalienable rights everyone was supposed to have naturally, blacks did not have by written law. Your ignorance in this regard is the fact you used the 1790 Naturalization Act, which stripped unalienable rights from everyone who was not white. In all of your arguments you ignore anyone not white. The 14th amendment did not nullify the Bill of Rights and digging up a right wing legal interpretation doesn't change that.
You said those rights were given by God. That means they cannot be taken away. I'm not talking about gun rights, I am talking about human rights. Limiting to right to use a gun is not the same as basic human freedom. You see after the preamble was written, the so called founders created this document called the constitution that defined our rights. The preamble is not the supreme law of the land.
Now you call me a racist, yet because I know what racism is, I know I haven't said anything racist. You have made a claim that is racist anywhere you go. There is nothing wrong with what I have said. If you found an all black forum and decided to "educate" them, you would get banned. You can only say what you do here. Or on Jerry Springer.
This is not about you kissing anyone's ass. It is about you making a racist claim that America belongs only to whites and that the 14th amendment is illegal because it hasn't been legally ratified so everybody here who is not white are not legal citizens.
PART 1 OF THIS RESPONSE
1) The white people took this land via treaties and the Right of Conquest
2) Yep. the Constitution did exclude blacks, but that is not the real reason for the 14th Amendment. It's a bit more complicated than that
3) As you are criticizing me, you're probably peering through your glasses wherein the glass was made in Japan (which claims to be the most racially pure country in the world.) You're probably sitting on a chair made in one of the Koreas that are 98 + percent racially homogeneous while pecking lies on a keyboard, hooked to a computer made in China (which is well in excess of 90 percent Han Chinese.)
Those countries and many others are homogeneous, but they are not white. So, you think nothing of their "
supremacy." You don't bitch about the slavers who brought blacks to America NOR your black brethren that rounded up them up and sold them to the slavers. Your hatred is reserved for the whites because you are not a damn bit better than anyone else.
YOU ARE A BLACK SUPREMACIST
4) You are wrong about
unalienable Rights. Naturalization is citizenship and
citizenship is a privilege, NOT a Right. Even the black people understand this concept. THAT is why they supported the Democrats (via Ted Kennedy's lobbying efforts) when they force fed us the immigration laws that put in arbitrary numbers of people who could come to the United States. Emmanuel Celler of the Hart - Cellar Act was the
Democrat that introduced that legislation and Philip Hart was the
Democrat Senator that helped him promote it. NOW, you have a real problem IM2:
ALL of Trump's supporters are advocating for the strict enforcement of the immigration laws that the Democrats put into place. The Democrats
real agenda was to flood America with non-whites and subtly commit genocide on the installment plan. Whites are only 1 in 13 of the world's population. By allowing people to come from all other nations equally, your side advocated a displacement of the founders / framers of the country and Constitution. They had to be eliminated, not protected while you sought this elusive "
equality."
Oh I'm going to do this in two parts and hope that someone reads it other than you