If the memo is all fact, why would there need to be a rebuttal memo? That sounds like partisan politics. "let me explain why those people suck"..

I mean, we dont even know what it says..
What if there was a REASON for it?
You are doing what you are bitching about...
Why dont ALL you people wait until the damn thing comes out?
How can we know it is all facts when it was divided on strictly partisan lines? Doesn’t that seem suspiciously one sided?
I am disturbed at the refusal to release all...it is like the Fusion GPS hearing.
Overall, I think it shows that the Intelligence Committee in the House can't be trusted to be fair and nonpartisan in their investigation. They're not even trying.
I see their point in not asking the FBI/DOJ to "brief" the committee on why it shouldn't release the memo--the memo presents damning information against the FBI/DOJ. Of course the committee doesn't want to hear them try to wiggle/lie their way out of it using their standard veil of secrecy and "classified" information. At least, that is how the people who wrote the memo think of it.
I don't like that Nunes didn't read the underlying documents that justify the memo. Many on the committee who are supporting the memo didn't. So to me it certainly seems partisan rather than real, factual concern.
I'm really saddened by this. If the FBI is overstepping its bounds, it won't be the first time, but the timing here? And the underlying concern--the FISA court's decision to re-up an investigation that MAY have included clues from the Steele dossier?
SO WHAT?