ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,723
- 1,830
So here's how the forces of PC conduct a purge..
NY Times Drops "Illegals," As Fox Continues To Cling To Slur | Blog | Media Matters for America
NY Times Drops "Illegals," As Fox Continues To Cling To Slur
New York Times executive editor Bill Keller, currently an op-ed columnist for the paper, answered readers who have repeatedly criticized him and the paper of record for their incessant use of derogatory term "illegals." Keller shared a handful of emails from readers, including from one who noted that the term "reduces human beings to a status label, and a morally loaded one at that."
After consulting the paper's style book, which advised Times journalists to use "illegal immigrant ... rather than the sinister-sounding illegal alien," Keller contacted the Times' "arbiter of style and taste" Phil Corbett who explained that " 'illegals' as a shorthand noun has an unnecessarily pejorative tone, and it is routinely used by the anti-immigration side." Corbett added: "I think it's wise to steer clear."
Keller concluded:
""""Well, vigilant readers, the good news is, you seem to have gotten the style book updated. And I'll resist that particular shorthand in the future.""""""
Just takes a couple of folks "feeling uncomfortable" to get phrases actually banned in the NY Times evidently... And the AP UPS THE ANTE with removing "illegal IMMIGRANTS".. A cascade of Political Correctness driven solely by the Leftist will to "do good" and not offend...
And the BEST PART??? ANYONE that DARES to continue the practice of using the disgraced offensive phrase (like Fox News) is now ""SLURRING"".. A virtual twofer right there my buds...
AP Drops "Illegal Immigrant" From Style Book - TalkLeft: The Politics Of Crime
It's about time. The Associated Press has dropped the term "illegal immigrant" from its stylebook. It explains:
The stylebook no longer sanctions the term “illegal immigrant” or the use of “illegal” to describe a person. Instead, it tells users that “illegal” should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally.
Why did we make the change? The discussions on this topic have been wide-ranging and include many people from many walks of life. (Earlier, they led us to reject descriptions such as “undocumented,” despite ardent support from some quarters, because it is not precise. A person may have plenty of documents, just not the ones required for legal residence
I stopped linking to articles using the word “illegal” in describing a person years ago and urge others do the same. For every news item on immigration, there are ten publications reporting it. Link to one who uses an acceptable rather than deprecated term in their coverage
There it is... The PC machine operates much the same as flash mobs or knock-out games.. Spreads both up and down the chain simultaneously..
Oh no! The NY TIMES doesnt have the right to stop using words! They are a victim of....
Ummm....Self Censorship? Then they called the use of the word "illegal" as a slur?!?! OMG!!! That must mean...IT IS A SLUR!! Because the NY TIMES said it was.
The NY Times also said that Flacaltenn was a shit eater. OMG look at Flacaltenn hes eating a shit sandwhich! Because the NY Times creates reality!
This lady once demanded that I call her cat Mr Snuggles. I was so distraught at being attacked by the PC police that I was forced to forever call him Mr Snuggles against my will