What if capitalist defeated commies? What would be outcomes for entire world? AND what if commies defeated capitalism? What would be outcome ?

vetea

Active Member
May 26, 2022
210
37
31
What would new which will happen or come if any of these come to full power?

I meant how it would help the world? And make it utopia?
 
Last edited:
Unregulated Capitalism is just as bad a Communism...

Just look at the price of insulin, a drug developed over a 100 years ago.


US has no real relationship with Communism... Actually accusations of it should tell us the accuser is an idiot and ignored from then on.

US has many Social Democratic programs which are good and generally popular (Roads, Bridges, Medicare, Police force....). Pure Capitalism means these would end much like pure Communism would mean personal ownership would end..
 
Unregulated Capitalism is just as bad a Communism...

Just look at the price of insulin, a drug developed over a 100 years ago.


US has no real relationship with Communism... Actually accusations of it should tell us the accuser is an idiot and ignored from then on.

US has many Social Democratic programs which are good and generally popular (Roads, Bridges, Medicare, Police force....). Pure Capitalism means these would end much like pure Communism would mean personal ownership would end..
Thats not because of capitalism, dumbass. Thats because the corporatists in the duopoly dont want to import cheaper medicine, all to keep big pharma donors happy.
Please stop spreading propaganda, comrade.
 
Unregulated Capitalism is just as bad a Communism...

Just look at the price of insulin, a drug developed over a 100 years ago.


US has no real relationship with Communism... Actually accusations of it should tell us the accuser is an idiot and ignored from then on.

US has many Social Democratic programs which are good and generally popular (Roads, Bridges, Medicare, Police force....). Pure Capitalism means these would end much like pure Communism would mean personal ownership would end..
So you meant both are harmful? In there purest forms?
 
Even at the height of Soviet Communism, a thriving, but informal (Black Market) Capitalist System existed.

In North Korea, arguably the most strict Communist system on the face of the earth (apart from Massachusetts) has stores that sell luxury good for cash and party members may buy and sell apartments.

Capitalism can eliminate Communism, but Communism can never thoroughly eliminate Capitalism. They just can't build enough gulags and re-education camps.
 
Unregulated Capitalism is just as bad a Communism...

Regulation of Capitalism is the one and only way that corruption can exist. When buying and selling are free and without government regulation, all trades are voluntary and agreeable to both parties.

"When buying and selling are legislated, the first thing to be bought and sold are legislators"

-- P.J. O'Rourke.
 
So you meant both are harmful? In there purest forms?
Nobody knows what the purest form of capitalism can bring because its never been done. The govt cant control themselves from being controlling.
Like how communism has never been fully implemented on a large scale because the govt is greedy.
Thats why the American Constitution is so awesome. It was supposed to keep our central govt in check but the lazy, stupid American people let them do whatever they want.
 
Unregulated Capitalism is just as bad a Communism...

Just look at the price of insulin, a drug developed over a 100 years ago.


US has no real relationship with Communism... Actually accusations of it should tell us the accuser is an idiot and ignored from then on.

US has many Social Democratic programs which are good and generally popular (Roads, Bridges, Medicare, Police force....). Pure Capitalism means these would end much like pure Communism would mean personal ownership would end..
I would love to hear you more.
 
Even at the height of Soviet Communism, a thriving, but informal (Black Market) Capitalist System existed.

In North Korea, arguably the most strict Communist system on the face of the earth (apart from Massachusetts) has stores that sell luxury good for cash and party members may buy and sell apartments.

Capitalism can eliminate Communism, but Communism can never thoroughly eliminate Capitalism. They just can't build enough gulags and re-education camps.
anyways just tell me what are the advantages on large scale and small scale of these both if any of them came into power.
 
Regulation of Capitalism is the one and only way that corruption can exist. When buying and selling are free and without government regulation, all trades are voluntary and agreeable to both parties.

"When buying and selling are legislated, the first thing to be bought and sold are legislators"

-- P.J. O'Rourke.

but capitalism is snatching entire economy from your hands. because each year every member of imf and world bank has to deposite certain amount of money into it. and when they want to take out there own money from imf and world bank than capitalists applies terms and conditions.

and than under those terms and conditions they brought liberalization and globalization. which took over the entire economy from one side and devaete the currency from another side.

so what are you talking ? huh? and now wto agreement is far more dangerous than these poor commies who are doing same thing.
 
Nobody knows what the purest form of capitalism can bring because its never been done. The govt cant control themselves from being controlling.
Like how communism has never been fully implemented on a large scale because the govt is greedy.
Thats why the American Constitution is so awesome. It was supposed to keep our central govt in check but the lazy, stupid American people let them do whatever they want.

how do you know ? that nobody has seen purest form of capitalism ? ask thailand which got finished due to taking loans from capitalists or say imf or world bank. and devalued its currency and sold its resources to imf and world bank.

and the biggest contribution capitalists gave them is they have to turn entire thailand into sex tourism spot.

because thai government saw women and childerns as another raw materials after annexing all herb mountains, rivers, iron mines, gold mines, diamond mines. this or that etc.

so are capitalists saintly ? as commies ? are they ?
 
how do you know ? that nobody has seen purest form of capitalism ? ask thailand which got finished due to taking loans from capitalists or say imf or world bank. and devalued its currency and sold its resources to imf and world bank.

and the biggest contribution capitalists gave them is they have to turn entire thailand into sex tourism spot.

because thai government saw women and childerns as another raw materials after annexing all herb mountains, rivers, iron mines, gold mines, diamond mines. this or that etc.

so are capitalists saintly ? as commies ? are they ?
Capitalists and capitalism are two different things.
You realize capitalism is LACK of govt intervention in the market, correct?
 
Capitalists and capitalism are two different things.
You realize capitalism is LACK of govt intervention in the market, correct?
i meant the capitalism of america which controls both imf and world banks. and they can bring whatever treaty they likes to in the name of terms and conditions. when you wants to take out your own money which you are depositing into both imf and world bank due to being member of these both.
_______________________
so anyways leave this aside and tell what are the outcomes in large scale and small scale and long range scale and short term scale if both of these came into power ?

what would these both do with our world ?
 
i meant the capitalism of america which controls both imf and world banks. and they can bring whatever treaty they likes to in the name of terms and conditions. when you wants to take out your own money which you are depositing into both imf and world bank.
_______________________
so anyways leave this aside and tell what are the outcomes in large scale and small scale and long range scale and short term scale if both of these came into power ?

what would these both do with our world ?
America isnt capitalist.
 
Commies will NEVER "win", and it's clear from the facts as they've been pointed out. Capitalism thrives in even the most authoritarian marxist hell holes, and even in the former USSR during it's earliest years had to tolerate some form of it to avoid collapse. No one has ever had to FORCE someone to be free and exploit their own labor or industriousness to enjoy prosperity. That shit sells itself.

Of the few marxist countries that ever existed, genocide, famines, terrorism, tyranny and poverty of the masses are the hallmarks and it has never been maintained without FORCE. It's also usually the FORCE of armed government thugs that bully disarmed populations.

NEVER FORGET THAT, because it's the reason bed wetting liberal parasites HATE the 2A and the fact they can not impose their will over us. They don't give a rat's ass about "children", they demand whores can murder babies before they're born. It has NOTHING to do with "public safety", it has everything to do with commissar safety.


.
 
Commies will NEVER "win", and it's clear from the facts as they've been pointed out. Capitalism thrives in even the most authoritarian marxist hell holes, and even in the former USSR during it's earliest years had to tolerate some form of it to avoid collapse. No one has ever had to FORCE someone to be free and exploit their own labor or industriousness to enjoy prosperity. That shit sells itself.

Of the few marxist countries that ever existed, genocide, famines, terrorism, tyranny and poverty of the masses are the hallmarks and it has never been maintained without FORCE. It's also usually the FORCE of armed government thugs that bully disarmed populations.


NEVER FORGET THAT, because it's the reason bed wetting liberal parasites HATE the 2A and the fact they can not impose their will over us. They don't give a rat's ass about "children", they demand whores can murder babies before they're born. It has NOTHING to do with "public safety", it has everything to do with commissar safety.


.
Which is why.....

we need machine guns

In addition to my 2nd Amendment right, it is my 1st Amendment religious right to die a warrior's death with a machine gun in my hand and go to Valhalla.
 
Commies will NEVER "win", and it's clear from the facts as they've been pointed out. Capitalism thrives in even the most authoritarian marxist hell holes, and even in the former USSR during it's earliest years had to tolerate some form of it to avoid collapse. No one has ever had to FORCE someone to be free and exploit their own labor or industriousness to enjoy prosperity. That shit sells itself.

Of the few marxist countries that ever existed, genocide, famines, terrorism, tyranny and poverty of the masses are the hallmarks and it has never been maintained without FORCE. It's also usually the FORCE of armed government thugs that bully disarmed populations.

NEVER FORGET THAT, because it's the reason bed wetting liberal parasites HATE the 2A and the fact they can not impose their will over us. They don't give a rat's ass about "children", they demand whores can murder babies before they're born. It has NOTHING to do with "public safety", it has everything to do with commissar safety.

.
British made its all colonise sign world bank and imf treaties from the very day when these two were founded in brettenwoods, america.

and these both were multileteral treaties in which if one sheep does not wants to enter into the barn then other sheeps will force it to join it by all means.

so here goes your rubbish that no one is forcing anyone.
______________________________
and when these two imf and world bank took its members money to make the pond to fill with. they gave money like an idiots and than when they went first time to take some money ( there own money ) imf and world bank applied terms and conditions that you have to devalueate your current in such and such percentages.

so dont say like this that shit sold itself.
__________________
now i do not wish to put commies or marxists here. but i dont think that capitalists are going to take there win this time from them.
 
"Commies" are totalitarian shit stains. Maybe thats why?
America, per se, isnt after Russia. Certain individuals in America are. Im certainly not. I wish we had stayed the hell out of the war.
Shoulda just sold guns and ammo to everyone except the fuckin russians and let the goddamned nips run all the way east of moscow. Then we could have killed all the commies on this side of the world.

By 1945 the nips would have been at war with the krauts and the mongolians would have cut their supply lines in half. Shitler would have died soon regardless and socialism would have shit the bed the same way.

Just needed to get the fuckin krauts to send all the yids to Jerusalem and they would have wiped out the muzbots for us and the world would be a better place.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top