What goes around comes around: Trump and the Non Nothing Party!

[Wry Catcher]

The know-Nothing party, by name of American Party, U.S. political party that flourished in the 1850s. The Know-Nothing party was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti-Roman Catholic sentiment that started to manifest itself during the 1840s. A rising tide of immigrants, primarily Germans in the Midwest and Irish in the East, seemed to pose a threat to the economic and political security of native-born Protestant Americans. In 1849 the secret Order of the Star-Spangled Banner formed in New York City, and soon after lodges formed in nearly every other major American city.

See link at : Know-Nothing party | political party, United States

The similarity between the American Party and today's Republikan Party are obvious. Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

 

[P@triot]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

 

[Disir]

The know-Nothing party, by name of American Party, U.S. political party that flourished in the 1850s. The Know-Nothing party was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti-Roman Catholic sentiment that started to manifest itself during the 1840s. A rising tide of immigrants, primarily Germans in the Midwest and Irish in the East, seemed to pose a threat to the economic and political security of native-born Protestant Americans. In 1849 the secret Order of the Star-Spangled Banner formed in New York City, and soon after lodges formed in nearly every other major American city.

See link at : Know-Nothing party | political party, United States

The similarity between the American Party and today's Republikan Party are obvious. Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Wow. Just like racism and the Democrats?

 

[Kosh]

Another failed far left drone thread based on religious dogma not connected to reality!

JFK would not be allowed in the DNC today!

Even their god and Hero FDR would not be allowed even though they support him locking up Americans, attack a country that did not attack the US, Lying the US into a war, etc.

 

[kaz]

The know-Nothing party, by name of American Party, U.S. political party that flourished in the 1850s. The Know-Nothing party was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti-Roman Catholic sentiment that started to manifest itself during the 1840s. A rising tide of immigrants, primarily Germans in the Midwest and Irish in the East, seemed to pose a threat to the economic and political security of native-born Protestant Americans. In 1849 the secret Order of the Star-Spangled Banner formed in New York City, and soon after lodges formed in nearly every other major American city.

See link at : Know-Nothing party | political party, United States

The similarity between the American Party and today's Republikan Party are obvious. Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

The satire section has another thread on the way ...

 

[Nosmo King]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

 

[P@triot]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

 

[guno]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

the uneducated rubes

 

[Nosmo King]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

 

[jknowgood]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

No, queers should not marry. They should be able to get civil unions, with all the benefits of marriage. Marriage is between a male and female. No, the mother should not kill their unborn baby, and science will soon prove they are babies. Hope this helps.

 

[Nosmo King]

Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

No, queers should not marry. They should be able to get civil unions, with all the benefits of marriage. Marriage is between a male and female. No, the mother should not kill their unborn baby, and science will soon prove they are babies. Hope this helps.

What entity would enforce such rules? Perhaps government? How does that square with what we are being told about "limited" government? How can government get out of our lives yet mandate who we love and what women can and cannot decide about their reproductive systems?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The know-Nothing party, by name of American Party, U.S. political party that flourished in the 1850s. The Know-Nothing party was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti-Roman Catholic sentiment that started to manifest itself during the 1840s. A rising tide of immigrants, primarily Germans in the Midwest and Irish in the East, seemed to pose a threat to the economic and political security of native-born Protestant Americans. In 1849 the secret Order of the Star-Spangled Banner formed in New York City, and soon after lodges formed in nearly every other major American city.

See link at : Know-Nothing party | political party, United States

The similarity between the American Party and today's Republikan Party are obvious. Even the Pope has come under fire as too liberal / progressive in the minds of today's neo fascists.

Clinton embraced free trade, Wall Street regulation in emails released by Wikileaks

 

[jknowgood]

Fascism is left-wing you dillhole....

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

No, queers should not marry. They should be able to get civil unions, with all the benefits of marriage. Marriage is between a male and female. No, the mother should not kill their unborn baby, and science will soon prove they are babies. Hope this helps.

What entity would enforce such rules? Perhaps government? How does that square with what we are being told about "limited" government? How can government get out of our lives yet mandate who we love and what women can and cannot decide about their reproductive systems?

Government is in big time. Baker says they won't cater a queer wedding, but will sell them anything in the store. Government closes them down.
Abortion, if someone is caught getting one, they should be sterilized. So they won't have a chance to kill again and the doctor should lose his license. Since he took an oath to save lives not kill them.

 

[Nosmo King]

The only people who believe that are Right Wingers who flunked political science 101.

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

No, queers should not marry. They should be able to get civil unions, with all the benefits of marriage. Marriage is between a male and female. No, the mother should not kill their unborn baby, and science will soon prove they are babies. Hope this helps.

What entity would enforce such rules? Perhaps government? How does that square with what we are being told about "limited" government? How can government get out of our lives yet mandate who we love and what women can and cannot decide about their reproductive systems?

Government is in big time. Baker says they won't cater a queer wedding, but will sell them anything in the store. Government closes them down.
Abortion, if someone is caught getting one, they should be sterilized. So they won't have a chance to kill again and the doctor should lose his license. Since he took an oath to save lives not kill them.

So you're in favor of government intradiction in personal lives. How do you square that with Conservative doctrine that says government should not interfere in personal lives?

 

[jknowgood]

Fascism is totalitarianism you idiot. The polar opposite of right-wing, limited government ideology. You people are scary stupid...

Should homosexuals marry? Should a woman get an abortion? Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

No, queers should not marry. They should be able to get civil unions, with all the benefits of marriage. Marriage is between a male and female. No, the mother should not kill their unborn baby, and science will soon prove they are babies. Hope this helps.

What entity would enforce such rules? Perhaps government? How does that square with what we are being told about "limited" government? How can government get out of our lives yet mandate who we love and what women can and cannot decide about their reproductive systems?

Government is in big time. Baker says they won't cater a queer wedding, but will sell them anything in the store. Government closes them down.
Abortion, if someone is caught getting one, they should be sterilized. So they won't have a chance to kill again and the doctor should lose his license. Since he took an oath to save lives not kill them.

So you're in favor of government intradiction in personal lives. How do you square that with Conservative doctrine that says government should not interfere in personal lives?

Well we could charge them with murder and send them to prison for life. Would that be better.
Abortion is obviously interfering with the personal life of the baby.

 

[P@triot]

Should homosexuals marry?

That's for the people of each state to decide. See - the fascist progressive believes that everyone should be forced to accept gay marriage. The conservative says people should be free to decide for themselves.

Should a woman get an abortion?

Nobody has the right to take another human life. This is as stupid as declaring that outlawing murder (as we have done from the beginning of time) is "fascist".

Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

Yeah...that's what freedom is sparky. It includes the freedom to be racist, hateful, bigoted, etc. Progressive fascist believe thugs everyone should be forced to accept what they do. Do you see a pattern here sparky?

 

[Nosmo King]

Should homosexuals marry?

That's for the people of each state to decide. See - the fascist progressive believes that everyone should be forced to accept gay marriage. The conservative says people should be free to decide for themselves.

Should a woman get an abortion?

Nobody has the right to take another human life. This is as stupid as declaring that outlawing murder (as we have done from the beginning of time) is "fascist".

Should bigots be permitted to discriminate because the Bible told them so?

Yeah...that's what freedom is sparky. It includes the freedom to be racist, hateful, bigoted, etc. Progressive fascist believe thugs everyone should be forced to accept what they do. Do you see a pattern here sparky?

Actually, it's not a matter of forced acceptance but equality under the law. Someone married in Maryland is married in California and Maine and Iowa. Your stilted notion would call that basic freedom into question.

On human life, when an in vitro fertilization clinic purges their freezers, are they committing mass murder? What's the difference? Should a woman expecting triplets be allowed to drive in the HOV lane? What's human life? An embryo or an actual living human?

While people certainly have the right to be bigots, when the ACT upon that bigotry is when they harm the rights of others.

 

[P@triot]

While people certainly have the right to be bigots, when the ACT upon that bigotry is when they harm the rights of others.

You do not have the right to my labor. Therefore, your rights are never "harmed" by my acting on bigotry. Nice try.

 

[Nosmo King]

While people certainly have the right to be bigots, when the ACT upon that bigotry is when they harm the rights of others.

You do not have the right to my labor. Therefore, your rights are never "harmed" by my acting on bigotry. Nice try.

If your business is open to the public, if you business is licensed by the state, your labor is directly connected to these conditions.

 

[P@triot]

Actually, it's not a matter of forced acceptance but equality under the law. Someone married in Maryland is married in California and Maine and Iowa. Your stilted notion would call that basic freedom into question.

The U.S. Constitution says otherwise. No state is required to recognize the marriage of another state. Sorry. It has nothing to do with "freedom". That's a vintage false narrative (and ironic coming from the side that unilaterally rejects freedom in favor of collectivism and a bat-shit crazy ideology). You are free to get married. Nobody is preventing that. But a state is free not to recognize that marriage.