What Form Of Government Is Better Than A Constitutional Republic?

[cnm]

One thing these two nations have in common is that they're racially homogeneous.

Doesn't know the meaning of words and is a racist. Let's go for the trifecta.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Oh. Another ******* idiot who doesn't know the meaning of words. Should have known only that start these sorts of threads.

Democracy is a system of government in which people choose their rulers by voting for them in elections.​

"The politics of Finland take place within the framework of a parliamentary representative democracy. Finland is a republic whose head of state is President Sauli Niinistö, ..."

Politics of Finland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[SaxonJackson]

Unitary parliamentary democracy is the best form of government, shown by the fact the vast majority of the happiest countries use it.

Like I said earlier ... Finland is a pretty successful Republic and, for the time being, their people enjoy the fruits of the structure of that Republic.

 

[Blues Man]

Would you prefer the sine qua non of American life, freedom?

Freedom Index by Country 2026

Detailed data on freedom index by country throughout the years, including scores for Human Freedom, Personal Freedom, and Economic Freedom.

worldpopulationreview.com

1. Switzerland — 9.11
2. New Zealand — 9.01
3. Denmark — 8.98
4. Estonia — 8.91
5. Ireland — 8.90
6. Canada — 8.85
7. Finland — 8.85
8. Australia — 8.84
9. Sweden — 8.83
10. Luxembourg — 8.80

I'm not going to bother listing the systems/forms of government they have. The majority of them should be pretty obvious.

IDGAF about other countries.



Happiness is 100% subjective and therefore completely meaningless as a measure of anything.

 

[cnm]

"The politics of Finland take place within the framework of a parliamentary representative democracy. Finland is a republic whose head of state is President Sauli Niinistö, ..."

It chooses its government by voting for it in elections, you slack jawed yokel.

 

[cnm]

Like I said earlier

Yes, but you demonstrate you have all the comprehension of the average slack jawed US yokel, so there's that.

 

[cnm]

Happiness is 100% subjective and therefore completely meaningless as a measure of anything.

Therefore so is the best form of government. So this OP, thread and your contributions to it may as well never have existed.

 

[cnm]

IDGAF about other countries.

As though the US has other forms of government with which to compare itself.

You guys are outdoing yourselves on this thread.

 

[Blues Man]

Therefore so is the best form of government. So this OP, thread and your contributions to it may as well never have existed.

Government is completely irrelevant to a person's happiness.

Happiness is internal and not given to you by the ******* government.

You people are so ******* pathetic that you relinquish yourselves completely to the ******* government.

 

[Blues Man]

As though the US has other forms of government with which to compare itself.

You guys are outdoing yourselves on this thread.

Unlike you I don't depend on government to make me happy.

IMO ALL government is nothing but a necessary evil

 

[SaxonJackson]

It chooses its government by voting for it in elections, you slack jawed yokel.

I guess you'll have to call Finland and correct them on their terminology. They consider themselves a "republic."

Here's an example of a true "democracy": Three wolves and a sheep "vote" on what's for dinner.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Yes, but you demonstrate you have all the comprehension of the average slack jawed US yokel, so there's that.

Coming from a Marxist who can't comprehend Finland's form of government.

 

[cnm]

Unlike you I don't depend on government to make me happy.

I love how you keep running away from 'freedom'.

 

[Blues Man]

I love how you keep running away from 'freedom'.

I'm not I'm telling you government does not provide happiness to anyone but you are so beholden to the idea that government is responsible for your happiness that you are utterly incapable of understanding that.

 

[cnm]

Coming from a Marxist who can't comprehend Finland's form of government.

Hilarity. Who lives in a country ranked miles freer - and happier - than the US.

 

[cnm]

I'm not I'm telling you government does not provide happiness to anyone but you are so beholden to the idea that government is responsible for your happiness that you are utterly incapable of understanding that.

From the evidence it is quite obvious that different forms of government are more or less conducive to citizens' happiness. And Freedom.

Your country has drawn a short straw. Sorry about that, but you'll have to recognise the problem before you can change.

 

[Blues Man]

From the evidence it is quite obvious that different forms of government are more or less conducive to citizens' happiness. And Freedom.

Your country has drawn a short straw. Sorry about that, but you'll have to recognise the problem before you can change.

Entirely subjective therefore meaningless.

And herein lies the difference between you and me. I don't let other people tell me what makes me happy and I don't care what makes other people happy even if they are mistaken when they think happiness is provided by the government.

 

[Pete7469]

The original intent of the Founding Fathers was that the Federal Government was to be limited. It's power and scope was to be limited to specific goals and purposes. Never did the Founders intend for the Federal Government to grab so much power from the States and "We The People." So our current form of government is not a reflection of our Founder's vision.

I certainly agree with your last sentence.

It would seem obvious from all of the quotes and texts I've read as well.

Of course the bed wetters even attempt to mischaracterize things Jesus Christ Himself said in Gospels, not He, nor the founders suggested support of a high tax nanny state ruling over a disarmed herd of slaves that can be culled and manipulated by the whim of a handful of globalist elite egghead deviant lunatics.

Even if you reject my assertion that the objective of the left is a dystopian marxist hell hole, there remains no evidence to support any other assertion that the founders inserted the 10th Amendment into the COTUS so that the states could deal with domestic issues in different ways and so that people could migrate when states became to detrimental to the standards of living people expect.

 

[cnm]

I mean, is anyone here going to argue that living in an autocracy is not less conducive to one's happiness and freedom?

Blues Man?

 

[cnm]

Entirely subjective therefore meaningless.

Yeah, right.