What Form Of Government Is Better Than A Constitutional Republic?

[DudleySmith]

It's quite obvious from your comment you either didn't bother finding out the 10 happiest countries or know nothing about them.

In any event, your ignorance is exceeded only by your smug exceptionalism.

I've been to most of them. They don't have to spend much of anything on defense, and it has been several decades since the last time they were invaded by their neighbors, a fact you're too stupid to acknowledge, since you're just another deviant parrot who doesn't do historical facts, since you don't have any reason to bother with that stuff.

 

[DudleySmith]

The original intent of the Founding Fathers was that the Federal Government was to be limited. It's power and scope was to be limited to specific goals and purposes. Never did the Founders intend for the Federal Government to grab so much power from the States and "We The People." So our current form of government is not a reflection of our Founder's vision.

I certainly agree with your last sentence.

And the other side of the coin is they also didn't want private wealth and giant corporations to have unlimited power and scope either.

 

[cnm]

So our current form of government is not a reflection of our Founder's vision.

Unitary parliamentary democracy is the best form of government, shown by the fact the vast majority of the happiest countries use it.

 

[cnm]

and it has been several decades since the last time they were invaded by their neighbors

Lol. When was the last time the US was invaded by its neighbours?

 

[cnm]

you're just another deviant parrot who doesn't do historical facts

I obviously know more of the history of the 10 happiest countries than do you. All you can do is chant 'USA USA USA'.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Murica hasn't had one of those for over a century, so what model do we have to compare against?

Begging the question fallacy.

None and none.

At this point, it's arguable that a relatively benevolent mafioso capo regime would be a better deal than the "republic" we're currently suffering under.

I think I agree with you but your response is vague enough that I can't say for certain.

Personally ... I like what early America was supposed to be. I think some of the later amendments to the Constitution may have been where "Murica" made a wrong turn. I don't personally believe that every rag-tag, worthless, non-productive American (and non-American, as the case may be) should have a vote. If you work, produce, and participate in America's growth, stability, and greatness and if you're a natural-born citizen ... then you get to vote. If you're a worthless blood sucker who benefits from the welfare system? Then stay home!

 

[SaxonJackson]

Laws and Constitutions are only as good as those willing to abide by them and enforce them.

Put another way, pick a moral people and place them in the worst possible form of government, and they will fix it.

Put an amoral people, i.e. Leftists, in the best possible form of government, and they will destroy it.

Couldn't agree more:

John Adams: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

 

[DudleySmith]

Lol. When was the last time the US was invaded by its neighbours?

View attachment 776013

Just this morning.

 

[Blues Man]

The original intent of the Founding Fathers was that the Federal Government was to be limited. It's power and scope was to be limited to specific goals and purposes. Never did the Founders intend for the Federal Government to grab so much power from the States and "We The People." So our current form of government is not a reflection of our Founder's vision.

I certainly agree with your last sentence.

The ship of "original intent" has sailed and sunk.

The people with the power will never relinquish it and they won't ever have to as long as the moronic population of this country believe that their votes actually matter

 

[cnm]

Personally ... I like what early America was supposed to be.

An oligarchy run by white, male, property owners?

Takes all sorts I guess.

 

[DudleySmith]

I obviously know more of the history of the 10 happiest countries than do you. All you can do is chant 'USA USA USA'.

lol you don't know squat. Smoke another rock and make up another lie, tard.

 

[cnm]

Just this morning.

See? You need a unitary parliamentary constitutional democracy.

Stat.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Finland is the happiest nation so must have the best form of government, a parliamentary representative democracy.

The politics of Finland take place within the framework of a parliamentary representative democracy. ​

But to be clear ... Finland is actually a Republic ... not a "democracy" in the strict sense of the word.

 

[DudleySmith]

An oligarchy run by white, male, property owners?

Takes all sorts I guess.

Yes, that one, the one all those brown and black people flee to instead of to Africa or Central America, dumbass.

 

[cnm]

lol you don't know squat

While you still pretend the 10 countries can be lumped together, because of your ignorance...

 

[DudleySmith]

While you still pretend the 10 countries can be lumped together, because of your ignorance...

Why do you still pretend you know stuff? Because of your ignorance.

 

[cnm]

But to be clear ... Finland is actually a Republic ... not a "democracy" in the strict sense of the word.

Oh. Another ******* idiot who doesn't know the meaning of words. Should have known only those start these sorts of threads.

Democracy is a system of government in which people choose their rulers by voting for them in elections.​

 

[Blues Man]

I obviously know more of the history of the 10 happiest countries than do you. All you can do is chant 'USA USA USA'.

Happiness is too subjective a measure to be reliable.

What makes you happy does not make everyone happy.

You like being told what do to by the ******* government. So of course you think the ******* government is a source of your happiness.......................................

 

[SaxonJackson]

Denmark is next happiest, so a Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy must be next best.

If they are so happy then why do they need NATO?

Denmark is next happiest, so a Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy must be next best.

One thing these two nations have in common is that they're racially homogeneous. They share a similar history, culture, and lifestyle. Of course ... the Globalists are feverishly attempting to destroy that homogeny by importing hoards of so-called "refugees" from the Middle East and Africa. These Globalist "recruits" don't give two hoots about the forms of government enjoyed by Denmark, Finland, or any other European form of government. They're hell-bent on committing crime and creating havoc. They're literal invaders and cancers on whatever society they suck off of.

 

[cnm]

Happiness is too subjective a measure to be reliable.

Would you prefer the sine qua non of American life, freedom?

Freedom Index by Country 2026

Detailed data on freedom index by country throughout the years, including scores for Human Freedom, Personal Freedom, and Economic Freedom.

worldpopulationreview.com

1. Switzerland — 9.11
2. New Zealand — 9.01
3. Denmark — 8.98
4. Estonia — 8.91
5. Ireland — 8.90
6. Canada — 8.85
7. Finland — 8.85
8. Australia — 8.84
9. Sweden — 8.83
10. Luxembourg — 8.80

I'm not going to bother listing the systems/forms of government they have. The majority of them should be pretty obvious.