What drives anti-government extremists?

[Harry Dresden]

The leftist sees government as a security blanket and a binky.

They love to contradict themselves, they want you to give up your guns and rely on the police, then come down on the police for doing their job.

The far left should not ever be in power!

neither should the far right....do you agree?.....

 

[Kosh]

The leftist sees government as a security blanket and a binky.

They love to contradict themselves, they want you to give up your guns and rely on the police, then come down on the police for doing their job.

The far left should not ever be in power!

neither should the far right....do you agree?.....

Yes I agree, but the far left is the bigger problem once they are removed form power the far left will be easy to remove. Extremists of any kind should not be in power.

However here in the states the far right does not have near the control the far left has.

And the far right and the far left are technically one in the same.

 

[Ibentoken]

How come nobody wants to talk about Kornze, Harry Reid and his son?

 

[Stephanie]

lol, Lakota cracks me up

the left see government for what it is and should be

so they "the FEDERAL government) should take 200 armed agents to seize your homes?
and they should lay on FINE on you if you don't want to PURCHASE something from them
and they should tell you what kind of light bulbs, soda cups size, and that you and your children are little fatasses

what frikken joke
THIS federal government is out of control and has now under Obama become tyrants..he has UNLEASED every government agency on us to put their jackboots on our necks, they are coming after people who they see as political ENEMY'S with the IRS, the EPA will knock you down with regulations that wipe out how many jobs...they have taken over our insurance, our health care LIED to us TO DO IT...yet you post a thread whining about why should anyone be ANTI-government

 

[norwegen]

Here's one explanation from a bunch of anti-government (actually anti-oppressive-government) extremists.

Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript

Enjoy.

Quite true. Parliament's attemps to impose an Anglican Episcopate on the colonists early in the eighteenth century aroused suspicions of precedent and the subordination of liberty to prerogative that proved absolutely real in the 1760s and '70s.

The Americans, members of the commonwealth who enjoyed unprecedented liberties and trememdous levels of happiness and prosperity, confronted a torrent of government intrusion and Toryism with violence and in short order. They concluded during the passage and implemantation of the Stamp Act, the Townsend duties, the Sugar Act, the Tea Act, the Boston Port Act, The Administration of Justice Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Quebec Act, the Quartering Act, the creation of the American Board of Customs Commissioners, stricter enforcement of the Navigation Laws, arbitrary judicial tenure and salaries, and a flurry of other measures and intrusions by Britain that her ministers had embarked on a "deliberate and systematical plan of reducing us to slavery."*

One of those opposing the Whigs was Lord Bute, who said that the people "have too much liberty." Does he sound like a typical lefty? Of course he does. “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

* Thomas Jefferson

 

[Harry Dresden]

I have my own beliefs and opinions, but I'd really like to hear from others.

Why do you add the word extremist? Maybe because anyone who is against the current agenda has been unfairly deemed extremist because libs think anyone not in agreement with them is some kind of radical.

Our founders were anti-government and desired liberty and freedom and a country where the people would be served by government and not the other way around. That sentiment holds true today and those who speak up for our rights are vilified by the left.

Anti-big controlling government is a good thing. Only those wanting government to take the lead in our lives is radical.

OUR FOUNDERS WERE ANTI GOV'T? LOL

Must be why they got rid of that states rights thing for the STRONG FEDERAL GOV'T CONSTITUTION

yea Anti-British Govt.....

 

[Ibentoken]

I had a steak last night. I'm an animal abuser.

 

[norwegen]

Here's one explanation from a bunch of anti-government (actually anti-oppressive-government) extremists.

Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript

Enjoy.

That's anti-monarchy little moron. And later on when the anti-government nutters went against Washington, he crushed their insurrectionist asses.

Did you know Thomas Jefferson was one of these "anti-government nutters"?

I doubt you did.

 

[Ibentoken]

This is for all you Harry Reid lovers.
The Founding Fathers Understood The Importance Of States' Rights | Representative John Becker (R) | The Ohio House of Representatives

 

[norwegen]

You would be correct, if we had a King like they did.

We're approaching one. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of revolution.

And the anti-government nutters here hate a lot more than just what might oppress them.

Name one.

The EPA, the FDA, the IRS, the INS, the DOE, the DEA, the TSA, the D of Ed., The White House currently, the SC often enough, the BLM, and on and on and on, not to mention the VA, SSI, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and UI.

Oh, look. A list of ministries. A reason for the Declaration of Independence.

And these barely scratch the surface in today's American government.

Anti-government. What a laugh. What did you bend over for before bending over for your masters?

 

[Kosh]

Why do you add the word extremist? Maybe because anyone who is against the current agenda has been unfairly deemed extremist because libs think anyone not in agreement with them is some kind of radical.

Our founders were anti-government and desired liberty and freedom and a country where the people would be served by government and not the other way around. That sentiment holds true today and those who speak up for our rights are vilified by the left.

Anti-big controlling government is a good thing. Only those wanting government to take the lead in our lives is radical.

OUR FOUNDERS WERE ANTI GOV'T? LOL

Must be why they got rid of that states rights thing for the STRONG FEDERAL GOV'T CONSTITUTION

yea Anti-British Govt.....

Actually it was anti-European religious dogma Govt.

 

[Harry Dresden]

They love to contradict themselves, they want you to give up your guns and rely on the police, then come down on the police for doing their job.

The far left should not ever be in power!

neither should the far right....do you agree?.....

Yes I agree, but the far left is the bigger problem once they are removed form power the far left will be easy to remove. Extremists of any kind should not be in power.

However here in the states the far right does not have near the control the far left has.

And the far right and the far left are technically one in the same.

However here in the states the far right does not have near the control the far left has.


i dont agree....they are ******* up the Republicans as much as the Far Left is ******* up the Democrats......

 

[Kosh]

neither should the far right....do you agree?.....

Yes I agree, but the far left is the bigger problem once they are removed form power the far left will be easy to remove. Extremists of any kind should not be in power.

However here in the states the far right does not have near the control the far left has.

And the far right and the far left are technically one in the same.

However here in the states the far right does not have near the control the far left has.


i dont agree....they are ******* up the Republicans as much as the Far Left is ******* up the Democrats......

Of course one that leans far left would say that.

Then again what do you consider to be "far right"?

 

[Harry Dresden]

OUR FOUNDERS WERE ANTI GOV'T? LOL

Must be why they got rid of that states rights thing for the STRONG FEDERAL GOV'T CONSTITUTION

yea Anti-British Govt.....

Actually it was anti-European religious dogma Govt.

who was in charge?....

 

[Kosh]

yea Anti-British Govt.....

Actually it was anti-European religious dogma Govt.

who was in charge?....

Depends on who you ask since the French help the colonists.

 

[norwegen]

I guess the primary drivers are ignorance, fear, and hate - mixed with various religious views.

"Huh?"

Those guys who were the most radically liberal and progressive of their day?

What does liberal mean?

 

[Dad2three]

Who authorized the BLM to use force and kill livestock?

Don't know how a court of law works huh? Or who carries out those COURT ORDERS?

Give us a link to the court order, you lying fake.

Wing nuts *shaking head*


Decision and Order - United States v Bundy - 1998.

1998_U_S__Dist__LEXIS_23835


Bureau of Land Management. "Environmental Assessment Temporary Land Closure Corrals and Cattle Impoundment"

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/media...espass EA DOI-BLM-NVS010-2014-0020-EA (2).pdf


United States of America v. Bundy - Document 35
Court Description:

ORDER Granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying as moot 28 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/9/2013


Document 35 :: United States of America v. Bundy :: 2:2012cv00804 :: Nevada District Court :: US Federal District Courts Cases :: Justia

 

[Darkwind]

Here's one explanation from a bunch of anti-government (actually anti-oppressive-government) extremists.

Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript

Enjoy.

Quite true. Parliament's attemps to impose an Anglican Episcopate on the colonists early in the eighteenth century aroused suspicions of precedent and the subordination of liberty to prerogative that proved absolutely real in the 1760s and '70s.

The Americans, members of the commonwealth who enjoyed unprecedented liberties and trememdous levels of happiness and prosperity, confronted a torrent of government intrusion and Toryism with violence and in short order. They concluded during the passage and implemantation of the Stamp Act, the Townsend duties, the Sugar Act, the Tea Act, the Boston Port Act, The Administration of Justice Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Quebec Act, the Quartering Act, the creation of the American Board of Customs Commissioners, stricter enforcement of the Navigation Laws, arbitrary judicial tenure and salaries, and a flurry of other measures and intrusions by Britain that her ministers had embarked on a "deliberate and systematical plan of reducing us to slavery."*

One of those opposing the Whigs was Lord Bute, who said that the people "have too much liberty." Does he sound like a typical lefty? Of course he does. “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

* Thomas Jefferson

Exactly so. Why did they the King need all these taxes?

To pay for his adventurism in America and to cover the costs of government (His) programs that were deemed necessary.

Reminds Me of all the government programs sold to the American people about a compassionate government.

In other words, they dream it up, and the subjects will just have to pay for it.

 

[Dad2three]

"Huh?"

Those guys who were the most radically liberal and progressive of their day?

What does liberal mean?

The opposite of conservative

lib·er·al
adjective \ˈli-b(ə-)rəl\

: believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change : relating to or supporting political liberalism


ull Definition of LIBERAL
1
a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts <liberal education>
b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth
2
a : marked by generosity : openhanded <a liberal giver>
b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way <a liberal meal>


5
: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms


Liberal - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

 

[Dad2three]

Here's one explanation from a bunch of anti-government (actually anti-oppressive-government) extremists.

Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript

Enjoy.

Quite true. Parliament's attemps to impose an Anglican Episcopate on the colonists early in the eighteenth century aroused suspicions of precedent and the subordination of liberty to prerogative that proved absolutely real in the 1760s and '70s.

The Americans, members of the commonwealth who enjoyed unprecedented liberties and trememdous levels of happiness and prosperity, confronted a torrent of government intrusion and Toryism with violence and in short order. They concluded during the passage and implemantation of the Stamp Act, the Townsend duties, the Sugar Act, the Tea Act, the Boston Port Act, The Administration of Justice Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Quebec Act, the Quartering Act, the creation of the American Board of Customs Commissioners, stricter enforcement of the Navigation Laws, arbitrary judicial tenure and salaries, and a flurry of other measures and intrusions by Britain that her ministers had embarked on a "deliberate and systematical plan of reducing us to slavery."*

One of those opposing the Whigs was Lord Bute, who said that the people "have too much liberty." Does he sound like a typical lefty? Of course he does. “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

* Thomas Jefferson

Exactly so. Why did they the King need all these taxes?

To pay for his adventurism in America and to cover the costs of government (His) programs that were deemed necessary.

Reminds Me of all the government programs sold to the American people about a compassionate government.

In other words, they dream it up, and the subjects will just have to pay for it.

Conservatives generally have no idea the 13 colonies agreed to pay England back for defending it during the French and Indian War