God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
First, we know you're a lightweight b/c you can't explain it in your own words.
Second, only four in ten millennials left (and they could come back when they're older).
As for your first link, it's from 2007 (old as yer pud) and today's scientists are mostly atheist. We still have creation scientists which the article ignored.
Another fail on your lightweight part.
There's no such thing as a creation scientist, b/c creation can't be proven scientifically.
And you can't deny, and didn't, that people are leaving religion in droves, because science has shown it to be wrong about way too many things.
That's your ignorance or a lie. I read a thread today that showed creation happened. You know Einstein's equation E=mc2 (squared). Humans can turn matter into energy, but they can't turn energy into matter m=E/c2 (squared). Thus, that is scientific evidence of God. How else did the universe, Earth, and everything in it come to be. It goes to show you and your atheist scientists are wrong, wrong, wrong and evolution is just a theory.
If that's scientific evidence of god, then you should have no problem linking me to a REAL science sight that says this. And none of your fake creation science nonsense, they are NEVER based on science, just the same twisted illogical nonsense that you just put forward.
Just because science hasn't completely solved the Big Bang mystery doesn't mean that it automatically points to an invisible being who rules over everything. C'mon brah, get a grip.
You just got pw3nd and exposed as someone who doesn't know science. Do you know what c2 (squared) is? How can someone make that? Second, what did the matter to energy (which humans can do) create?
I don't want to waste time talking to the scientific illiterate dumbarse which many posters here think you are.
HOLY OBFUSCATION BATMAN!!
So you can't link me. Got it. All you have is fartsmoke.
As usual you can't answer my questions (only two) so until you can a link won't help you. We've discovered not much can help you as you just keeping making sh*t up. It fits why evolution is just a theory.
No, we discovered you were the braggadocio who ended up being the lightweight. Now, you're denying what atheist scientists have claimed. It is obvious you can't put 2+2 together.
"Atheist" scientists say they can't yet see all the way back to the BB, so only have THEORIES, for lack of any hard evidence. But lack of hard evidence never bothered you. Too bad. A little more critical thinking is in order.
Well those are dumb atheist scientists since they have discovered the CMB as proof that the universe had a beginning. Next, the universe had to have energy for matter to form and expand. What do you know... God created space, light (EMS), and separated the light from dark to form night and day (24-hrs) for the Earth.
On the other hand, your side made up a fairy tale. It's the atheist religion disguised as science, i.e. wrong and fake science.
Scientists admit that they can’t see all the way back to the BB. Whatever you make up about it, is just that, made up. But maybe you’re not smart enough to figure that out. Too much fake religion.
No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Why are you reading accounts literally when you yourself reject the literal interpretation as far fetched, dummy?God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
First, we know you're a lightweight b/c you can't explain it in your own words.
Second, only four in ten millennials left (and they could come back when they're older).
As for your first link, it's from 2007 (old as yer pud) and today's scientists are mostly atheist. We still have creation scientists which the article ignored.
Another fail on your lightweight part.
There's no such thing as a creation scientist, b/c creation can't be proven scientifically.
And you can't deny, and didn't, that people are leaving religion in droves, because science has shown it to be wrong about way too many things.
That's your ignorance or a lie. I read a thread today that showed creation happened. You know Einstein's equation E=mc2 (squared). Humans can turn matter into energy, but they can't turn energy into matter m=E/c2 (squared). Thus, that is scientific evidence of God. How else did the universe, Earth, and everything in it come to be. It goes to show you and your atheist scientists are wrong, wrong, wrong and evolution is just a theory.
If that's scientific evidence of god, then you should have no problem linking me to a REAL science sight that says this. And none of your fake creation science nonsense, they are NEVER based on science, just the same twisted illogical nonsense that you just put forward.
Just because science hasn't completely solved the Big Bang mystery doesn't mean that it automatically points to an invisible being who rules over everything. C'mon brah, get a grip.
You just got pw3nd and exposed as someone who doesn't know science. Do you know what c2 (squared) is? How can someone make that? Second, what did the matter to energy (which humans can do) create?
I don't want to waste time talking to the scientific illiterate dumbarse which many posters here think you are.
HOLY OBFUSCATION BATMAN!!
So you can't link me. Got it. All you have is fartsmoke.
As usual you can't answer my questions (only two) so until you can a link won't help you. We've discovered not much can help you as you just keeping making sh*t up. It fits why evolution is just a theory.
No, we discovered you were the braggadocio who ended up being the lightweight. Now, you're denying what atheist scientists have claimed. It is obvious you can't put 2+2 together.
"Atheist" scientists say they can't yet see all the way back to the BB, so only have THEORIES, for lack of any hard evidence. But lack of hard evidence never bothered you. Too bad. A little more critical thinking is in order.
Well those are dumb atheist scientists since they have discovered the CMB as proof that the universe had a beginning. Next, the universe had to have energy for matter to form and expand. What do you know... God created space, light (EMS), and separated the light from dark to form night and day (24-hrs) for the Earth.
On the other hand, your side made up a fairy tale. It's the atheist religion disguised as science, i.e. wrong and fake science.
Scientists admit that they can’t see all the way back to the BB. Whatever you make up about it, is just that, made up. But maybe you’re not smart enough to figure that out. Too much fake religion.
Where do they "admit that they can't see all the way back to the BB?"
Big talk, but nothing to back it up. Only a puny, puny, puny brain. You're worthless, Taz . Replace your avatar with a hot.
That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Because that's how it was written, you're the one who cherry picks parts out. HAIRY BALL LICKER.Why are you reading accounts literally when you yourself reject the literal interpretation as far fetched, dummy?God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
Ok, for disobeying god (for eating the hetero apple and doing it), same thing.God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
No, He did not. That is nowhere in the Bible.
You have a comprehension problem...
No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
No. That's not how it was written. That's how you want to read it because you know reading it like that is wrong and you want it to be wrong. You don't want to understand what it means. You want to discredit it.Because that's how it was written, you're the one who cherry picks parts out. HAIRY BALL LICKER.Why are you reading accounts literally when you yourself reject the literal interpretation as far fetched, dummy?God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
It WAS written to read literally. It's only science that made people move the goalposts.No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Your own behaviors tell you it could not have been written to be read literally so it must have been written to be read allegorically like a fable. Which makes perfect sense as these were stories that were told orally for thousands of years.
The original sin is not disobeying God, dummy, it not taking accountability.Ok, for disobeying god (for eating the hetero apple and doing it), same thing.God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
No, He did not. That is nowhere in the Bible.
You have a comprehension problem...
Nope. Here is what ancient man captured in Genesis.It WAS written to read literally. It's only science that made people move the goalposts.No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Your own behaviors tell you it could not have been written to be read literally so it must have been written to be read allegorically like a fable. Which makes perfect sense as these were stories that were told orally for thousands of years.
I'm sure that Adam would have boasted to anyone alive that he just plugged Eve. What are you talking about?The original sin is not disobeying God, dummy, it not taking accountability.Ok, for disobeying god (for eating the hetero apple and doing it), same thing.God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
No, He did not. That is nowhere in the Bible.
You have a comprehension problem...
That's what YOU captured from Genesis. And you left out the part where god drowns nearly everyone, and that impossible story about a boat with 2 of all the animals we see today on it.Nope. Here is what ancient man captured in Genesis.It WAS written to read literally. It's only science that made people move the goalposts.No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Your own behaviors tell you it could not have been written to be read literally so it must have been written to be read allegorically like a fable. Which makes perfect sense as these were stories that were told orally for thousands of years.
1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation
I am talking about the point of the story. The point of the story that you continue to read literally is not that man disobeyed God, it is that mad failed to take accountability when he disobeyed God. Failing to take accountability is the root cause of all of man's problems.I'm sure that Adam would have boasted to anyone alive that he just plugged Eve. What are you talking about?The original sin is not disobeying God, dummy, it not taking accountability.Ok, for disobeying god (for eating the hetero apple and doing it), same thing.God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
No, He did not. That is nowhere in the Bible.
You have a comprehension problem...
No. That's what anyone who was interested in finding out what that account was all about would conclude because you know for a fact reading those account literally doesn't make sense. Which is why you want everyone to read those accounts literally. You aren't interested in the truth. You are only interested in subordinating religion.That's what YOU captured from Genesis. And you left out the part where god drowns nearly everyone, and that impossible story about a boat with 2 of all the animals we see today on it.Nope. Here is what ancient man captured in Genesis.It WAS written to read literally. It's only science that made people move the goalposts.No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Your own behaviors tell you it could not have been written to be read literally so it must have been written to be read allegorically like a fable. Which makes perfect sense as these were stories that were told orally for thousands of years.
1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation
You must get a sore back moving the goalposts so much and so often. Maybe you should start your own Christian sect.I am talking about the point of the story. The point of the story that you continue to read literally is not that man disobeyed God, it is that mad failed to take accountability when he disobeyed God. Failing to take accountability is the root cause of all of man's problems.I'm sure that Adam would have boasted to anyone alive that he just plugged Eve. What are you talking about?The original sin is not disobeying God, dummy, it not taking accountability.Ok, for disobeying god (for eating the hetero apple and doing it), same thing.God kicked out Adam and Eve out of Eden for having (hetero) sex. It’s right there in the bible. Own it.
And yet you said God kicked Adam and Eve out of the Garden for having hetero sex. Which by the way, He created their "parts" for just that thing, coded it into their DNA and told them to use them and multiply.
You have a comprehension problem...
No, He did not. That is nowhere in the Bible.
You have a comprehension problem...
The truth is the bible makes no sense.No. That's what anyone who was interested in finding out what that account was all about would conclude because you know for a fact reading those account literally doesn't make sense. Which is why you want everyone to read those accounts literally. You aren't interested in the truth. You are only interested in subordinating religion.That's what YOU captured from Genesis. And you left out the part where god drowns nearly everyone, and that impossible story about a boat with 2 of all the animals we see today on it.Nope. Here is what ancient man captured in Genesis.It WAS written to read literally. It's only science that made people move the goalposts.No. I understood that it made no sense if it was meant to read literally just as you did. The only difference is I didn't stop there. You did.That's not what it was when it was written, they thought all the things in it were true. You bastardized the bible because you know some of it can't be true. So you cherry pick out the part you feel like.No cherry picking, Taz. It's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. You yourself reject them because literally they don't make sense. So therefore, you yourself agree that they must be allegorical because they can't be literal.The ones you cherry picked, ball licker.No. Just the ones that were obviously written in an allegorical manner like modern day fables, dummy.Ya, anything that makes no sense is allegorical. A total cop-out, lol.I don't give much thought to others labeling me, Taz. I've done my due diligence.Not what most bible believers think. Making you a heretic.
I also don't shy away from discussions on the meaning of ancient man's accounts. I hold my own just fine.
Your own behaviors tell you it could not have been written to be read literally so it must have been written to be read allegorically like a fable. Which makes perfect sense as these were stories that were told orally for thousands of years.
1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation
