what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.

According to Director Comey, there are no privacy rights. So there.
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Apparently, they're accused of accessing and releasing completely true information, which allegedly changed some people's minds about who to vote for.

I know, the horror, right?


Poor Bernie sanders got the shaft from his peeps


sad really
 
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
Fine.

You may very well be right.

Now, give us a defensible metric, by which we may measure the extent or degree to which the November 8, 2016 election was actually influenced by such leaks-releases.

Until you (collectively) can do that, this is all just background noise, to a great many people, and it smacks of sour grapes and Sore Loser syndrome.

Doesn't mean that there isn't one helluva lot of genuine and legitimate concern over such activity, just that it is being deflected to some substantial extent by such arguments.

And, frankly, although I, too, want to get to the bottom of this, so that these offshore phukkers can't come at us again like this, and declaring here and now that if there was collusion between Americans and Russians on this, that I want our own collaborators (metaphorically) crucified in the criminal courts... at the same time, I want and need to know...

Given that the vast majority of people had made up their minds to vote for Clinton or Trump
long before those leaks-releases hit the airwaves, how many people changed their vote from Clinton to Trump, largely on the basis of those leaks-releases?

My guess is, in a nation of 310,000,000 souls, you can probably count that number, nationwide, on one set of fingers and one set of toes.

In that hyper-narrow context... how many votes were actually changed by those leaks-releases... it seems reasonable to call it a Flea... a Gnat... a Pimple... negligible... nichts... nada... nothing.

The Dems are using this a an emotional crutch to explain (in part) their humiliation at the polls on November 8th; they need to stop that, grow up, look at their fruitcake agenda and their present-age disdain for White Christian America and the spendthrift ways, and change all that, rather than continuing to delude themselves.

Or so it seems, to this observer.
 
Last edited:
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.

Translation:

They exposed the fraud, corruption, and lawlessness of the Clintons and the DNC.


You forgot to add "yet again" to the end of your post.
 
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
Evidence of this?? ..... :cool:

lol. Read a ******* paper.
just link us
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
i guess it worked. who did the hacking ?

Why did you start a thread on a topic that there's already been 100 threads on?

Go back and read those threads and you'll find your answer.
none of those threads are mine.

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_election...
The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian ... Russian officials have repeatedly denied involvement in any DNC hacks or leaks. Obama ordered a report on foreign interventions in the 2016 elections.
 
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.

Translation:

They exposed the fraud, corruption, and lawlessness of the Clintons and the DNC.

So Trump is full of shit to be complaining about being wiretapped, even if it were true?


Why are you changing the subject?
 
Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.
Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.
I didn't know the Fed's have a "Thought Police" bureau? ..... :cool:
I don't think they do. They do have a "usual suspects list" when it comes to treason, espionage, and running dogs and lackeys for the Russians.
 
Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.
Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.
I didn't know the Fed's have a "Thought Police" bureau? ..... :cool:
there would be if clinton won... eyee yi ya...
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

What did the new black panthers do ?? Stand around ?
 
this is the wikipedia account:

The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 United States elections.[1] An intelligence community assessment stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."[2]
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

What did the new black panthers do ?? Stand around ?
well let's see...
 
Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.

Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.

Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.
 
Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.

Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.

Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.
Keep tabs of those who talk against the American system in a way that aids and abet the enemy is the actions of a 'thought police.' Who knew?
 
the way this is written...

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), representing 17 intelligence agencies, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and leaked its documents to WikiLeaks.[3] In early January 2017, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper testified before a Senate committee that Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign went beyond hacking, and included disinformation and the dissemination of fake news often promoted on social media.[4] Six federal agencies have also been investigating possible links between the Kremlin and Trump's associates, including his advisers Carter Page, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, as well as how money was possibly funneled from Russia into the US to aid Trump's election.[5][6]

U.S. intelligence agencies assessed that Putin "personally directed" the operation.[7] CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and DNI James R. Clapper agreed on the "scope, nature and intent" of Russia's alleged interference to assist Trump.[8] Several cybersecurity firms stated that the cyberattacks were committed by Russian intelligence groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.[9] In October 2016, U.S. President Barack Obama used the red phone line to directly contact Putin and issue a warning to him regarding the cyber attacks.[10] Russian officials have repeatedly denied involvement in any DNC hacks or leaks.[11][12][13]

Obama ordered a report on foreign interventions in the 2016 elections.[14] U.S. Senators called for a bipartisan investigation.[15] President-elect Donald Trump initially rejected the report, saying that Democrats were reacting to their election loss,[16] and attacked the intelligence agencies in a transition team statement.[17] Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell expressed confidence in U.S. intelligence and supported a bipartisan investigation,[18] which was started by the Senate Intelligence Committee on January 24, 2017.[19] On December 29, 2016, the U.S. expelled 35 Russian diplomats, denied access to two Russia-owned compounds, and broadened existing sanctions on Russian entities and individuals.[20] Several members of the Trump campaign have had contacts with Russian officials, which are currently being investigated.
 
Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.

Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.

Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.
Keep tabs of those who talk against the American system in a way that aids and abet the enemy is the actions of a 'thought police.' Who knew?

So we are going back to the days of J. Edger, interesting that the more we claim to progress, the further back we go.
 
15th post
So we are going back to the days of J. Edger, interesting that the more we claim to progress, the further back we go.
US agencies have always collected info on American citizens who actively support the efforts of countries whose actions are not in the US best interests. You know that, Papa.
 
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.

Translation:

They exposed the fraud, corruption, and lawlessness of the Clintons and the DNC.

Yeah, basically.

Don't get me wrong. IF the Russians or anyone else hacked e-mails, then it's illegal and should be investigated and dealt with on that basis. But it doesn't constitute "rigging the election", nor does it in any way invalidate the results of the election.
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

You mean other than not also illegally hacking and publicizing private RNC emails? Gee, I don't know...
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.


Probably the worst of it was: Bernie Sanders was also campaigning on a rigged election. The Russians hacked into the DNC database and released an email showing Debbie Wasserman's (DNC chair) anxiety over Sanders campaigning in that manner, and it sent Sanders supporters into a RAGE. Even though Hillary Clinton beat him by 3,775,237 votes they still believed that the primary was rigged against him, and they swallowed up the Russian news. Wasserman was fired over her comments. Trump moved in immediately to sweep up the collateral damage, and was actually appealing to them to move over to his column, actually citing Debbie Wasserman's email that it was proof, that the primary was rigged against Bernie Sanders.

In fact, we had many Sanders supporters on this board that were continually threatening that if Sanders didn't win the primary they were going to vote for Trump. I imagine many of them did.

Putin is also responsible for spreading all kinds of FAKE news on social media outlets, of course all negative and untrue about Hillary Clinton. Since the Youth in this country use social media outlets as their source of news, it did it's damage there also.

Not only that but we were watching Russian FAKE news all over this board. Reich wingers would pick up on all the FAKE news coming out of social media outlets and would bring them to this board with enough conspiracy theories that could fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. They believed it. The worst one being Hillary Clinton was running a child sex operation out of a pizza joint in Washington D.C that almost became very deadly.
Pizzagate: How a Clinton conspiracy theory led to a D.C. shooting

Regardless, collusion with a foreign adversary to interefere into an American election will be considered Treason, regardless if it changed one single vote. We consider cyber attacks to be the 21st century--Act of War.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia



Donald Trump NEVER stopped with the wikileaks--actually stating he LOVES Wikileaks. Basically praising Julian Assange who has been holed up in an Ecuador Embassy over the last 4 years with UK policie surrounding it, trying to avoid extradition back to the U.S. to face charges for what he did to G.W. Bush. Wikileaks basically putting a target on every one of our soldiers backs, and recently releasing CLASSIFIED CIA tactics on how we catch terrorists.
Why is Julian Assange still inside the embassy of Ecuador?
WikiLeaks says it has obtained trove of CIA hacking tools



179928_600.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom