It's a perfectly accurate portrayal of just how ugly Trumpsters can get.What is in error? Quote the piece that isn’t accurate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's a perfectly accurate portrayal of just how ugly Trumpsters can get.What is in error? Quote the piece that isn’t accurate?
Exactly.It’s suicide for him to. It proves you right
Broke, these people aren’t for truth. I posted the videoExactly.
It’s “ugly” for people to express disdain for things that cause decay and degradation in America? Isn’t it uglier for those like yourself and Unkotare to support the things you know for an absolute fact cause decay and degradation to the nation you claim to love?It's a perfectly accurate portrayal of just how ugly Trumpsters can get.
Everything you post is repugnant. I mean, that's why you do it, right?It’s “ugly” for people to ...
how are trump supporters reacist exactly? name something?I am not assuming, I'm observing. And where have you ever seen me make such ^^^ an accusation?
I’m simply direct, concise and unafraid of that pesky truth / reality that scares the piss out you and Unkotare .Everything you post is repugnant. I mean, that's why you do it, right?
General welfare means just that 'general' or what is beneficial to all Americans and not just favored or targeted groups.If you voted for Trump there’s a good chance you’re a lot like me with regard to why....I voted for him on two policies almost exclusively...First and foremost on how he would deal with illegal Mexicans and the border and second on how he would yank lowlifes off the Democrat induced welfare plantation.
Anyhoo, as we approach the point where welfare reform will be visited I ask for your opinions on EXACTLY what you think our founders meant when they used the phrase “GENERAL WELFARE” in the constitution?
Attention all Smartest Guys In The Room, and legal scholars:
Please spare us the case citations such as the U.S. vs Butler case and the like. I’m interested in YOUR opinions.
I get that folks like you are against pointing out flaws in our country! To actually say black on black crime is never discussed on main stream media is racist right? Telling truth's is not allowed in demofk 101, as stated by this demofkerEverything you post is repugnant. I mean, that's why you do it, right?
Uruguay. Uruguay is nice.The vast majority of Mexican immigrants are here illegally and or on stolen citizenships with illegal lineage.…either way they are present without the peoples consent.
Like all good real Americans with standards and expectations I’m “scared to death” of America becoming a Los Angeles like brown shithole.
If you didn’t hate America you’d feel the same way.
Why can’t you point us to a brown community, city, state or nation that we should want to model America after?
Who lives their lives creating profit for the bosses?Uhh. Who is it that invests the capital, takes the most risk, and creates the jobs again? You Socialists are pathetic.
I’m simply direct, concise and unafraid of that pesky truth / reality that scares the piss out you and Unkotare .
The fact that neither of you can answer the most basic of question tells us all we need to know. You don’t care about the state and future of the union…you care about the feelings of people breaking into our nation against our will.
That’s REPUGNANT
Keep reading, and consider who you jump into bed with.What is in error? Quote the piece that isn’t accurate?
What is "suicide" to whom?It’s suicide for him to. ...
There is no such thing as illegal lineage. No citizen needs BrokeLoser's consent.<snip>The vast majority of Mexican immigrants are here illegally and or on stolen citizenships with illegal lineage.…either way they are present without the peoples consent.
<snip>
how are trump supporters reacist [sic] exactly? name something? ...
dblack fails to comprehend the power to tax includes the power to spend the tax for the general welfare of the citizens and the country.The real problem with the general welfare clause starts when we accept the conceit that it amounts to an implied, general power to spend money. The clause supports and limits the power to tax, not a presumed power to spend. It's a subtle distinction, but it's the exploit liberals have used since the beginning to expand the power of the federal government.
Without workers owners and management have empty work places.Uhh. Who is it that invests the capital, takes the most risk, and creates the jobs again? You Socialists are pathetic.
There is no such thing.... on stolen citizenships with illegal lineage.…