GLASNOST
Platinum Member
Give me multiple choices and I will answer.What conditions would you accept an abortion, if any?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give me multiple choices and I will answer.What conditions would you accept an abortion, if any?
That's a problem with the majority of "Most of Jewish and Early Christian commentators".Most of Jewish and Early Christian commentators saw it is a harm to the woman, not to the fruit of the womb. Back in the time "premature birth" (especially very premature) usually meant that the fruit of the womb would not survive. Actually, even already born children were often traditionally more seen as a property of the father, rather than "rightful citizen". And in other translations it was not about "harm" but "appearance".
That's how the Jews have been reading it. They have reasons to believe that it was correct understanding.That's a problem with the majority of "Most of Jewish and Early Christian commentators".
Just because the Majority of "Interpreters/Commentators" say something, that doesn't mean that it's True.
It was mentioned among with other questions about property and health. And the fruit of the womb was seen rather as property of father, not a human being (and human beings were also of different values). If a woman (because of other man's actions) lost a fruit of her womb or a fruit of her tree, and her health wasn't significantly decreased (and so we are talking about early pregnancy) the man who did it must pay a reasonable sum of money to the father (and the owner of the tree and/or womb).And,... One has to be able to "Connect th' dots"/ Be capable of Critical Thinking. If the "Unborn Child/Child wasn't important,.... It wouldn't be mentioned Zav.
That's not My Understanding of The Scriptures.That's how the Jews have been reading it. They have reasons to believe that it was correct understanding.
It was mentioned among with other questions about property and health. And the fruit of the womb was seen rather as property of father, not a human being (and human beings were also of different values). If a woman (because of other man's actions) lost a fruit of her womb or a fruit of her tree, and her health wasn't significantly decreased (and so we are talking about early pregnancy) the man who did it must pay a reasonable sum of money to the father (and the owner of the tree and/or womb).
And you, as it is popular among Protestants, rather search for confirmation of your modernist Western ideas, rather actually trying understand Ancient Jews and their laws and ways of life. When you declare "Sola Sriptura!" you often actually mean "Sicut phantasiae meae!"
Even in Bible it is between man, another man and the judges. According Bible, woman shouldn't have any opinion about it.An Abortion performed, if it was to save the life of the Mother, would be between the Mother, Father, & The Almighty GOD.
And when you refuse in shelter to people who overwise could become citizens of America, isn't it a murder or even genocide?But an Abortion, carried out, so as to eliminate the Responsibility of Parenthood,.... Is Murder, and since that number, since Abortion became a "Right" is in the Millions,... Possibly even Genocide.
It is simply not true. The rape of the enemies, or f#cking prostitutes was alloved even without marriage (say nothing about polygamy and selling daughters).This Nation,.... Where "God Bless America!", is so often invoked,...... Should return to it's Biblical Foundation, and that Morality, where Sex before Marriage was not Publicly Accepted.
It's Zeb, if you don't mind. Zavulon is just a kind of modern pronouncing of Zebulun (זְבוּלֻן)That's not My Understanding of The Scriptures.
And don't "Assume" anything about me Zav,....You will embarrass Yourself.
No,... Your Handle states Zavulon, which shortened is "Zav". And You should change Your "Handle".It's Zeb, if you don't mind. Zavulon is just a kind of modern pronouncing of Zebulun (זְבוּלֻן)
Ok. How do you identify yourself? What is your cult?
As you wish, Sick.No,... Your Handle states Zavulon, which shortened is "Zav". And You should change Your "Handle".
And the topic is simple. Fetus is not a human being yet and it can be aborted at any time (if it doesn't hurt woman) for any reason.And as for a "Cult",.... Again,... You Assume a great deal.
Now, FOCUS on the topic, & not these "Head Games" that You want to play.
So what? God knew everything before even the Creation of the World. That's what "Omniscient" means. And it says nothing about equal rights for fetus, child, woman and adult man.Zav, U might want to look in to getting one of those "Neural Implants" designed to help one THINK.
Jer_1:5 “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you. Before you were born, I sanctified you. I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
But if you are for abortions with no restrictions, what if you knew they would be trans or gay and you could abort them? Would that be Ok?
Or better yet, what if you could abort them based on their political views?
As if a life of fetus, or a child, or a woman is equal to a life of adult man. It definitely wasn't in pre-Modern time.My only rule would be, if you want to abort a pregnancy, you have to choose a member of your family to be shot. A life for a life.
It takes two to Tango. If a female doesn't want a baby, use your arsehole or mouth. If a guy doesn't want a baby, aim for the arsehole or mouth.As if a life of fetus, or a child, or a woman is equal to a life of adult man. It definitely wasn't in pre-Modern time.
And, talking about traditional approaches, it wasn't woman's decision. It was man's decision, even in after-birth abortion. You know: "I made you, I can unmake you"
In traditional society it is only man's decision - how he f#ck woman.It takes two to Tango. If a female doesn't want a baby, use your arsehole or mouth. If a guy doesn't want a baby, aim for the arsehole or mouth.
Yes, but don't forget, we live in the present.In traditional society it is only man's decision - how he f#ck woman.
How the degradation was described in Romans 1:26?
--------
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones
--------
And if we live in present and don't follow the rules of Antient Jews, why do you oppose to abortion?Yes, but don't forget, we live in the present.
What makes you think I'm interested in what the Bible and Jews say? I couldn't give two hoots about their opinion.And if we live in present and don't follow the rules of Antient Jews, why do you oppose to abortion?
Ok. If so, why are you against abortion at all?What makes you think I'm interested in what the Bible and Jews say? I couldn't give two hoots about their opinion.
Very basic biology. If you want a baby, open your legs if you're female or if you're a bloke, find a willing woman with open legs. If neither wants a baby, keep the sperm off the egg, use a different orifice. Being pregnant in 99.9% of cases is not hazardous to health. Using healthcare for abortion is merely a contraception. If you don't want a baby and you instigate the makings of one, nature rewards your stupidity with a prize, a baby.Ok. If so, why are you against abortion at all?