Truth be told, I don't think the story is literal. It's the story for the beginning of a new cult.that would explain it!![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Truth be told, I don't think the story is literal. It's the story for the beginning of a new cult.that would explain it!![]()
That's my guess.there were humans without souls?
Then they said, “Let us make life in our image, in our likeness, the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky the livestock and all the wild animals, and all the creatures that move along the ground.”
I think you're on to something. The creation was covenantal.There were human being before Adam and Eve. Their creation story is told in Genesis 1.
Adam and Eve were created in Genesis 2. By the separate description of Adam being created and then later Eve, the story shows something special about Adam and Eve different from the original humans.
Maybe they were the first humans with souls. Maybe they were pro-Jews in some way.
So when Cain was banished, he was banished to live with people outside of his specially created family.
That's how I read it. I'm no theologean or Biblical scholar.
Yes, I meant to say "proto-Jews," but from your response, you clearly saw past that error. Probably not the best term to use.I think you're on to something. The creation was covenantal.
Pro Jew in a sense. Jews' ancestors, according to the Bible. Not the ancestors of all humankind.
Yes, that is how I read it.Pretty much the entire Bible is an autobiography of this particular people, and one of the first ones to put pen to paper knew little or nothing of nature or how the world worked. His intention seems mainly to impress upon his people that they were in covenant with God, the sun, moon, and stars serving merely as a backdrop.
in the land of Nod?
I think this goes contrary to the first seven days in the Bible
You lie quite easily.they lived a very primitive existence without same sex marriage, fluid genders, or single mother households
in the land of Nod?
I think this goes contrary to the first seven days in the Bible
Yet Christians sing of Adam's sin as a happy fault and necessary to God's plan. Would you refrain from sin and screw up Yahweh's plan?This has to be in order for all humans to be fallen in Adam.
Too stupid to warrant a reply.All humans come from Adam and Eve.
When the children of Adam and Eve wanted to find a mate, THEY WENT TO A CITY. What does that tell you?Were there human beings before Adam and Eve?
Yet Christians sing of Adam's sin as a happy fault and necessary to God's plan. Would you refrain from sin and screw up Yahweh's plan?
Too stupid to warrant a reply.
When the children of Adam and Eve wanted to find a mate, THEY WENT TO A CITY. What does that tell you?
OK, nice catch! Thanks! They didn't go to a city. In genesis Cain went to the land of Nod and built a city. Aside from that who was Cain afraid of being murdered by if there were no other people around and who was going to populate Cains city if there were no other people around? That was my point relative to the question of the OP.Book, Chapter and Verse?
OK, nice catch! Thanks! They didn't go to a city. In genesis Cain went to the land of Nod and built a city. Aside from that who was Cain afraid of being murdered by if there were no other people around and who was going to populate Cains city if there were no other people around? That was my point relative to the question of the OP.
Adam and Eve were obviously not the first human beings even according to Genesis where the talking serpent remains an obvious metaphor to this day for a despicable existing human archetype not unlike the big bad wolf.
If someone tries to convince you that you can set aside the command of God that prohibits idolatry, worship a Jewish man, and not die, you are standing before a direct descendant of that ever elusive talking serpent of old.
I would suggest avoiding making direct eye contact, back away very slowly, turn around, and then run like hell.
people could live for 1000 years?And the age of man in those days could well reach to 1000 years. (Gen. 5:1-27) Cain knew there would be plenty of other people around in his lifetime who would know he murdered his brother.

Yes it is. No creature on earth other than a human being talks. The story was written to educate Hebrew children about the dangers of losing your mind for life to a cunning cult leader. The pharaoh wore a serpent on his head.The talking serpent is no proof that other humans existed
people could live for 1000 years?
Methuselah lived for 969 years. If you divide 969 by 12 you end up with about 81 years old, about twice the lifespan of most people living back then. Obviously the stories reflect a time when people used a lunar calendar.
Yes it is. No creature on earth other than a human being talks.