“U.S. Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Tallahassee ruled Aug. 21 that Florida's gay marriage ban, passed by voters in 2008, is unconstitutional.”
Citizens' civil liberties are not subject to majority rule, the states have no authority to violate one's civil rights.
Who cares....it isn't a universally accepted right and is therefore not considered "constitutional".
Can't help that.
This is exactly why a good handful of the Found Fathers were wary of ever including a Bill of Rights in the first place. They knew future generations would foolishly interpret that only the rights specifically enumerated were rights to the exclusion of all others. It seems their fears were justified.
Like making stuff up ?
I am simply stating a fact.
If it were a constitutionaly protected right, there would be no court battles going on right now.
Just because some judge says it......does not make it so.
The fact that some would like it to be that way is what the Founders were wary of.
Have a day.
I am sorry? What exactly am I making up again? Quite a few of the Founding Fathers were very wary of supporting a Bill of Rights for the exact same reasons I mentioned above.
The 9th Amendment states: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The fact you don't believe court battles are not going on that concern constitutionally protected rights is quite shockingly ignorant on your part.