We're All Bipartisan at Heart

[Truthmatters]

the people don't want your party


you have to CHEAT to gain office

 

[Avatar4321]

If you believed in democracy you cant love the republican party

I believe in the Republic.

 

[Avatar4321]

the people don't want your party


you have to CHEAT to gain office

Again:

Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy

 

[Truthmatters]

Your right, I'm all for bipartisanship so long as all parties are operating within the strict limits of the Constitution, AS WRITTEN. Yep I'm for that.

and you are not the one who gets to tell us what the constitution means.


that is not within YOUR powers in this country.
Stop thinking YOUR the dictator here

No. The Constitution is what gets to say what the Constitution means.

For example, when the Constitution says "Congress shall make no law," it means that Congress shall make no law. Not some laws. Not alot of laws. Not laws only if this applies. No laws. Zero. Zilch Nada. None.

does EVERYONE in the country see the constitution and define it exactly like your idiot mind does?


NO


that mean you think EVERYONE should do what YOU say.


Go to hell you dictator

 

[Truthmatters]

the people don't want your party


you have to CHEAT to gain office

Again:

Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy

you gave three names and NO EVIDENCE of anything.

I gave you a 30 years of cases that culminated in a scotus decision.


YOUR PARTY cheats and the right wing leaning SCOTUS agrees your party needs to be punished for cheating non stop for 30 years.


Now what idiot?

 

[Avatar4321]

and you are not the one who gets to tell us what the constitution means.


that is not within YOUR powers in this country.
Stop thinking YOUR the dictator here

No. The Constitution is what gets to say what the Constitution means.

For example, when the Constitution says "Congress shall make no law," it means that Congress shall make no law. Not some laws. Not alot of laws. Not laws only if this applies. No laws. Zero. Zilch Nada. None.

does EVERYONE in the country see the constitution and define it exactly like your idiot mind does?


NO


that mean you think EVERYONE should do what YOU say.


Go to hell you dictator

Most people don't define something according to their mind. Most people use dictionaries.

 

[Avatar4321]

the people don't want your party


you have to CHEAT to gain office

Again:

Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy

you gave three names and NO EVIDENCE of anything.

I gave you a 30 years of cases that culminated in a scotus decision.


YOUR PARTY cheats and the right wing leaning SCOTUS agrees your party needs to be punished for cheating non stop for 30 years.


Now what idiot?

Evidence is public record. And im not going to post it for you when I know you are going to completely ignore it.

 

[Immanuel]

The poll also showed that Democrats are generally more willing to compromise than Republicans or Independents. Over 60 percent of Democrats said that “more compromise” was preferable, while only 55 percent of Independents and 38 percent of Republicans agreed. In addition, Democrats preferred compromise over ideological intransigence by a 41 percent margin, while Republicans said they sought the same by only a 2 percent margin.

Self-identified “Tea Party supporters” notched the most significant opposition to compromise, with only 39 percent supporting some form of it. Nonetheless, 40 percent of Tea Partiers still preferred tangible results to ideological purity.

Poll: 53 Percent Favor Compromise in Congress

That is funny, but you need to define the word compromise. To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

 

[mamooth]

Al Gore
Al Franken

Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face.

John Kennedy

With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.

Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer.

 

[mamooth]

To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.

 

[Immanuel]

To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.

There you go using words you don't know the meaning of again. Democrats weren't looking for compromise, they wanted it all. That is the problem. Democrats do not compromise. They demand complete and absolute submission.

 

[Avatar4321]

Al Gore
Al Franken

Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..

Good thing it's not dishonest then. Al Gore tried to steal Florida in 2000. He was stopped.
Al Franken had votes magically appear from the back of someone's car. He wasn't.

John Kennedy

With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.

Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer

You are unfamiliar with the dead who voted in large numbers in Chicago? Nixon could have disputed it, but he had more class than future candidates.

Just because your ignorant of something doesn't mean the rest of us are.

 

[Avatar4321]

To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.

What are you smoking? It certainly was the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise. And they did so with glee trying to blame Republicans for it.

And you're claiming others are living in fantasy.

 

[Truthmatters]

Again:

Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy

you gave three names and NO EVIDENCE of anything.

I gave you a 30 years of cases that culminated in a scotus decision.


YOUR PARTY cheats and the right wing leaning SCOTUS agrees your party needs to be punished for cheating non stop for 30 years.


Now what idiot?

Evidence is public record. And im not going to post it for you when I know you are going to completely ignore it.

when have you FACED the 30 year court record that goes all the way to the SCOTUS saying **** the republican party keep punishing them for cheating in elections?


when have you EVER admitted that is a cold hard undeniable fact that PROVES your party is NOT WANTED by the people so you have to CHEAT to win?



when did you EVER face those facts?

 

[Truthmatters]

To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.

What are you smoking? It certainly was the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise. And they did so with glee trying to blame Republicans for it.

And you're claiming others are living in fantasy.

your ******* insane

 

[Truthmatters]

Al Gore
Al Franken

Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..

Good thing it's not dishonest then. Al Gore tried to steal Florida in 2000. He was stopped.
Al Franken had votes magically appear from the back of someone's car. He wasn't.

John Kennedy

With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.

Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer

You are unfamiliar with the dead who voted in large numbers in Chicago? Nixon could have disputed it, but he had more class than future candidates.

Just because your ignorant of something doesn't mean the rest of us are.

Go get the court cases in which they were found guilty and punished for these crimes?



I gave you 30 years of court records which PROVE it about your party

 

[Edgetho]

Al Gore
Al Franken

Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..

Good thing it's not dishonest then. Al Gore tried to steal Florida in 2000. He was stopped.
Al Franken had votes magically appear from the back of someone's car. He wasn't.

John Kennedy

With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.

Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer

You are unfamiliar with the dead who voted in large numbers in Chicago? Nixon could have disputed it, but he had more class than future candidates.

Just because your ignorant of something doesn't mean the rest of us are.

Sam Giancana stuffed ballot boxes in Cook County (Chicago), throwing that State to Kennedy.

LBJ (aka; Landslide Lyndon) was a known election fraudster and also stuffed more than a few ballot boxes, while 'losing' several others, to throw Texas into the dimocrap win column.

Did they 'steal' the election? Almost certainly.

In fact, there were numerous FBI wire-taps with mobsters talking about how ungrateful JFK was to them for throwing the election his way....

Look, people. When I say that the dimocrap party is a criminal organization and not a political party, I'm not just hurling insults.......

From Tammany Hall to Al Capone and Mayor Daley's Chicago.... Wherever there is crime and corruption, the dimocrap party is knee-deep in it.

To this day, they haven't changed....... And they never will. It's what they are. It's who they are.

Criminals in a criminal organization.

And their voters aren't any better.

 

[Edgetho]

the people don't want your party


you have to CHEAT to gain office

It isn't cheating. It's simply trying to prevent the stupidest motherfuckers on Earth -- You, and people like you, from voting.

You're too stupid to vote.

You prove it every time you cast a ballot. Every post you make, every opinion you have.....

You shouldn't vote and, for the good of mankind, you shouldn't breed.

 

[LoneLaugher]

The poll also showed that Democrats are generally more willing to compromise than Republicans or Independents. Over 60 percent of Democrats said that “more compromise” was preferable, while only 55 percent of Independents and 38 percent of Republicans agreed. In addition, Democrats preferred compromise over ideological intransigence by a 41 percent margin, while Republicans said they sought the same by only a 2 percent margin.

Self-identified “Tea Party supporters” notched the most significant opposition to compromise, with only 39 percent supporting some form of it. Nonetheless, 40 percent of Tea Partiers still preferred tangible results to ideological purity.

Poll: 53 Percent Favor Compromise in Congress

That is funny, but you need to define the word compromise. To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

You believe that?

 

[LoneLaugher]

To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.

Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.

What are you smoking? It certainly was the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise. And they did so with glee trying to blame Republicans for it.

And you're claiming others are living in fantasy.

You believe that, huh?