Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No stupid. It doesn't. At all. I'm literally rolling on the floor over your stupidity right now.Elected officials representing the will of the people. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
No. What we're saying is that you have an IQ of about 27. And you talk out of your ass. You've literally never read the U.S. Constitution and yet you're sitting here trying to claim how government works.Businesses have used lobbyists to push laws to reduce protections and wages for workers forever. Are you saying it's fine when owners do it, but not when workers do it?
Based on your posts, it's pretty clear that you are the asshole that didn't read the article.We both know you didn't. Your original reply tells us that. But hey this is the internet, you can pretend all you want and call me names. Have at it champ!100% chance you are wrong and a moron. but hey, thanks for playing!
That's so stupid, only you could come up with it.Sure it is. If the workers elect officials that further their interests, that's exactly the way out election system is supposed to work.
- That "system" is our political system, idiot. The free market is our economic system. Dumb ass.
- Even our political system doesn't work that way. We have something called the "U.S. Constitution". You know, that thing you hate? It prevents the exact stupidity you are claiming right now. Dumb ass.
Oh you poor little dumb snowflake. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricts the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and telling private business owners how much they must pay their employees is not one of those powers.There is nothing unconstitutional about electing pro worker representatives, even if you wish it was.
No stupid. It doesn't. At all. I'm literally rolling on the floor over your stupidity right now.Elected officials representing the will of the people. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
If the "will" of the "people" was to execute all black people and assholes with the screen name "Bulldog" and they elected people who were willing to do that, would that be ok? Would that be legal? Constitutional?
You truly are a very special kind of stupid, BD.
No. What we're saying is that you have an IQ of about 27. And you talk out of your ass. You've literally never read the U.S. Constitution and yet you're sitting here trying to claim how government works.Businesses have used lobbyists to push laws to reduce protections and wages for workers forever. Are you saying it's fine when owners do it, but not when workers do it?![]()
Then they shouldn't work an entry-level job designed for a 14 year old, dumb ass.We're talking about people who have to feed their families and put a roof over their heads.![]()
And your point would be....???? It's a FREE market. Nobody forced them to work there. They chose it. They felt the compensation was fair.How many fast food workers are adults?
Half of fast-food workers are 23 or older.
Then they shouldn't work an entry-level job designed for a 14 year old, dumb ass.We're talking about people who have to feed their families and put a roof over their heads.![]()
Those jobs are mostly held by adults, and they are entitled to be treated fairly. What you think about that doesn't matter.
No stupid. It doesn't. At all. I'm literally rolling on the floor over your stupidity right now.Elected officials representing the will of the people. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
If the "will" of the "people" was to execute all black people and assholes with the screen name "Bulldog" and they elected people who were willing to do that, would that be ok? Would that be legal? Constitutional?
You truly are a very special kind of stupid, BD.
Nit pickey, aren't you? Of course all our laws need to be constitutional, but that doesn't preclude electing pro worker representatives any more than it precludes pro rich people representatives.
Oh you poor little dumb snowflake. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricts the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and telling private business owners how much they must pay their employees is not one of those powers.There is nothing unconstitutional about electing pro worker representatives, even if you wish it was.
Yeah...I tend to be "nit picky" when it comes to obeying the law.Nit pickey, aren't you?
Then they shouldn't work an entry-level job designed for a 14 year old, dumb ass.We're talking about people who have to feed their families and put a roof over their heads.![]()
Those jobs are mostly held by adults, and they are entitled to be treated fairly. What you think about that doesn't matter.
How are they not treated fairly? I'm selling my car for $15,000. You agree to buy my car for $15,000. How were you treated unfairly?
No stupid. It doesn't. At all. I'm literally rolling on the floor over your stupidity right now.Elected officials representing the will of the people. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
If the "will" of the "people" was to execute all black people and assholes with the screen name "Bulldog" and they elected people who were willing to do that, would that be ok? Would that be legal? Constitutional?
You truly are a very special kind of stupid, BD.
Nit pickey, aren't you? Of course all our laws need to be constitutional, but that doesn't preclude electing pro worker representatives any more than it precludes pro rich people representatives.
Government forcing companies to pay a wage they approve of is not pro-worker, it's dictatorship or at the very least, Socialism.