Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
If it wasn't something American's would be upset about he wouldn't have whispered the comment.
So what are we in for?
Ideas?
So what are we in for?
Ideas?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nuclear Arms reductions
Putin wants none or little of our nuclear defense shield set up to defend against missile attacks from Russia. If we do set it up that way (to defend against attacks coming from Russia), he will target more places in the USA.If it wasn't something American's would be upset about he wouldn't have whispered the comment.
So what are we in for?
Ideas?
Nuclear Arms reductions
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Putin wants none or little of our nuclear defense shield set up to defend against missile attacks from Russia. If we do set it up that way (to defend against attacks coming from Russia), he will target more places in the USA.If it wasn't something American's would be upset about he wouldn't have whispered the comment.
So what are we in for?
Ideas?
Obama is going to give in and appease the Russians. Obama is a goddamned Marxist!
Nuclear Arms reductions
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Nuclear Arms reductions
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Nuclear Arms reductions
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Zero might be good, but are we willing to trust the Russians or others when they promise to do likewise?
We wouldn't have much of Barry's 'flexibility' to work with if we woke up one morning nuke free only to find out the other guys were just kidding about it.
I figured that but too what level is the question.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Reagan was wrong. He spoke for and about a different nuclear generation.
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Zero might be good, but are we willing to trust the Russians or others when they promise to do likewise?
We wouldn't have much of Barry's 'flexibility' to work with if we woke up one morning nuke free only to find out the other guys were just kidding about it.
Disarmaments are witnessed by the other side
Zero might be good, but are we willing to trust the Russians or others when they promise to do likewise?
We wouldn't have much of Barry's 'flexibility' to work with if we woke up one morning nuke free only to find out the other guys were just kidding about it.
Disarmaments are witnessed by the other side
Right! ...and Hitler built V-2 rockets underground.
Trust your enemy....to be your enemy!
Reagan said we should get down to zero
That is a good target
Zero might be good, but are we willing to trust the Russians or others when they promise to do likewise?
We wouldn't have much of Barry's 'flexibility' to work with if we woke up one morning nuke free only to find out the other guys were just kidding about it.
Disarmaments are witnessed by the other side
Zero might be good, but are we willing to trust the Russians or others when they promise to do likewise?
We wouldn't have much of Barry's 'flexibility' to work with if we woke up one morning nuke free only to find out the other guys were just kidding about it.
Disarmaments are witnessed by the other side
Right! ...and Hitler built V-2 rockets underground.
Trust your enemy....to be your enemy!