We will benefit from this

True. That's probably why the old regime is still in place.
As my dad would say
"that used to be true."
Venezuela oil is soft coal.

If there is a profit to made,
a risked to be taken,
reasonably assured by the government,
They will line up to explore Venezuela,
Put the Venezuelans back to work.
Let Venezuela be great.
all they needed was a rescue from a bully.
No thugs
Not a shot fired.

Cuba....
 
A brief list of some facts which our pathetic shitlibs and progs cannot handle.

1. Maduro was NOT the actual “leader” of VZ.
2. Because of that, Maduro has exactly NO diplomatic immunity.
3. If the manner in which Maduro was seized violated some precepts of so-called international “law” (an always amusing misnomer), still our courts have jurisdiction over him and his case.
4. Notwithstanding that President Trump did authorize the use force in the capture of Maduro, we are still NOT at war with VZ.
5. As for the lib claim that President Trump has now started “x” number of “wars,” the truth remains. We are not now in any wars at all.

And not one of our Board’s most vocal shitlibs have come even close to addressing those facts.
 
If that fantasy works for you, have at it!
No. The fantasy is all yours.

That’s why you despise facts.

Here’s a novel idea. Why not try to be honest for a refreshing change of pace? I swear, it won’t kill yiu.
 
Harley owners need lots of oil.


Just look at their garage floor.
1767821260607.webp
 
No. The fantasy is all yours.

That’s why you despise facts.

Here’s a novel idea. Why not try to be honest for a refreshing change of pace? I swear, it won’t kill yiu.
You sure as hell won't answer honestly. But I've learn to count on that, from your feeble trolling. It's all you do.
 
You said i couldnt find one but i did. I found a few. Sorry.
You didnt find one. I read your article. It does t say what you claim. Thats why you refuse to post the actual quote.
 
You sure as hell won't answer honestly. But I've learn to count on that, from your feeble trolling. It's all you do.
I did honestly answer. You just don’t care for the answer. So, as per your MO, you resort to mislabeling what I posted.

Sorry, peewee. But your game is old, plodding, stale and simply not working.

As usual.

You’re pretty easy to rebut and so forth because you telegraph when you’ve done of the edge. But we all know that you’re the troll.
 
15th post
You didnt find one. I read your article. It does t say what you claim. Thats why you refuse to post the actual quote.
LOL dude you said this
Im making reasonable predictions about oil prices dropping once production starts in Venezuela. You wont find a single economist in the world who disagrees. YOU on the other hand are are saying a bunch of retard shit that has no basis in reality. :cuckoo:
Then i posted this article that said this
“Many folks are far too optimistic that this will have immediate and measurable effect,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. “It is unlikely. It would take years and even then the impacts may be more measured in pennies per gallon than dimes.”
But even under what GasBuddy’s De Haan called “the most optimistic timelines,” it will take years for oil supply to enter the world market. He and others wonder how much incentive major oil companies have to even tackle such a project, given the geopolitical risks and the steep costs to ramp up production.
Independent energy analyst Rachel Ziemba, who agrees major oil companies may hesitate, also notes that declines in the price of crude – the raw material for consumer products like gasoline – are often not fully passed on to consumers. For example, crude prices were down nearly 20% in 2025, but gas prices fell less than 10%, she said.
The Goldman analysts are forecasting only a $2 per barrel change either up or down, meanwhile, depending on whether the more optimistic or pessimistic scenario comes to pass. That represents only about a 4% change to their base case forecast of $56 a barrel for Brent crude, the world benchmark.

"This won't be as smooth or easy as the administration is indicating," Ziemba told USA TODAY.

The bottom line for consumers? “The potential for additional oil may stabilize oil in the years to come, but don't expect gas price parties with a national average below $2/gal anytime soon,” De Haan said.


You obviously didnt read the article. Apology accepted.
 
I did honestly answer.
Nope. You dodged. Here's the question:
Interesting. After Biden cheated to win the election, would you have supported China performing regime change in the US?

Just curious if you have any consistency in your principles.

Wanna try again? I'm assuming not. But please go on with your trolling. It's what you do best!
 
Nope. You dodged. Here's the question:
No. Repeating your lie doesn’t convert it into a truth.
Wanna try again? I'm assuming not. But please go on with your trolling. It's what you do best!
I already answered your ridiculous faux question. China could not legally seize our President. He has diplomatic immunity.

Maduro did not.

It’s not clear why that straightforward actual answer confuses you so much.

But, you’re here just for the trolling, again, clearly. So, not really a surprise.
 
No. Repeating your lie doesn’t convert it into a truth.

I already answered your ridiculous faux question.
No you're a lying **********. But we already knew that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom