Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the court defines the constitution
there was a such thing as socialism in this country
Did you go to the Village Idiot School of Grammar or are you literally that stupid?won't work ace , heres the fact, you say something is unconstitutional, I say bullshit and here is why "Bullshit , if it contradicts the constitution you your self can literally take this to court yourself and argue your made up point. Which is totally bullshit , the court defines the constitution not some red neck out in bozo land. " Try to argue that hot rod. POST 94 total nonsense.
Of course it isn't. That's why you look to a bunch of people with fancy titles and robes to do it for you. How's the weather in Hicksville these days?Funny, it still isn't ever defined by some redneck from hicksville.
I've made this clear , yes we should and we have constitutional limits defined by the courts not some redneck from hickFunny, it still isn't ever defined by some redneck from hicksville. By the way how do you spell government spelling expert/ You are a joke.The Court does not define the Constitution. They interpret it. And, like anyone, they make mistakes. Do you think there should be any Constitutional limits on governement?won't work ace , heres the fact, you say something is unconstitutional, I say bullshit and here is why "Bullshit , if it contradicts the constitution you your self can literally take this to court yourself and argue your made up point. Which is totally bullshit , the court defines the constitution not some red neck out in bozo land. " Try to argue that hot rod. POST 94 total nonsense.Lol. Nice job, genius.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .
Heh... sure. Glad you enjoyed it. Do you think we should even have Constitutional limits on government?
Funny, it still isn't ever defined by some redneck from hicksville. By the way how do you spell government spelling expert/ You are a joke.The Court does not define the Constitution. They interpret it. And, like anyone, they make mistakes. Do you think there should be any Constitutional limits on governement?won't work ace , heres the fact, you say something is unconstitutional, I say bullshit and here is why "Bullshit , if it contradicts the constitution you your self can literally take this to court yourself and argue your made up point. Which is totally bullshit , the court defines the constitution not some red neck out in bozo land. " Try to argue that hot rod. POST 94 total nonsense.Lol. Nice job, genius.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .
Heh... sure. Glad you enjoyed it. Do you think we should even have Constitutional limits on government?
Funny, it still isn't ever defined by some redneck from hicksville. By the way how do you spell government spelling expert/ You are a joke.The Court does not define the Constitution. They interpret it. And, like anyone, they make mistakes. Do you think there should be any Constitutional limits on governement?won't work ace , heres the fact, you say something is unconstitutional, I say bullshit and here is why "Bullshit , if it contradicts the constitution you your self can literally take this to court yourself and argue your made up point. Which is totally bullshit , the court defines the constitution not some red neck out in bozo land. " Try to argue that hot rod. POST 94 total nonsense.Lol. Nice job, genius.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .
Heh... sure. Glad you enjoyed it. Do you think we should even have Constitutional limits on government?
Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .The problem with Medicare for all, is that Medicare does not pay the full cost of health care.
The irony of Medicare for All is that gullible progressives think it will remove insurance company profits from the equation. Medicare does the opposite. A lot of people mistakenly think of Medicare as government run insurance. It's not. Medicare farms out insurance to the same companies that you're dealing with now. The only difference between Medicare and private insurance is that the government pays for it, rather than your employer.
That was not quite English.
Reality is, Medicare operates through insurance companies. Insurance companies get paid a fairly decent profit, to process medicare claims.
In fact, we have insurance companies here in Ohio, that ONLY process medicare claims, because essentially you get to make a good profit from just pushing papers around.
In 2011 or so, I remember a fuss over an insurance company, I believe in New York that wanted to increase premiums more than in years. This was a political cry, because Obama care falsely promised to reduce health insurance premiums (a ridiculous claim at face value. when has government actually reduced the cost of anything? Only moron would believe that).
The company was pointing out they were losing money on insurance policies because of Obama Care requirements.
The left-wingers pointed out they posted higher than ever profits.
The problem was, the company was losing money on their private insurance polices that they actually had to pay for.
The higher profits were from the increased load of expanded Medicaid and Medicare.
Medicare will make the super wealthy insurance companies, even more wealthy and filthy rich, for two reasons. One, they don't have to compete. Competition in the market forces down profits, because there is always someone who will offer a lower price to the public, for a smaller profit margin.
With Medicare and Medicaid, there is no competition.
Second, the company doesn't have to pay for care. They just collect the profits from processing Medicare and Medicaid claims. They are not putting out a penny for health care themselves. They just stamp the paperwork, and file it with government.
This is the top of the stupid list for the day.Yes I just said USA pays 4 times more than it should thanks to govt involvement. We need to shift to capitalism wherein there is competition to bring price down and quality up. Are you still confused???Obviously, you made that up. The US pays more per person for HC then anyother free nation in the world.
It's been a slice , to much wasted bandwidth.Did you go to the Village Idiot School of Grammar or are you literally that stupid?won't work ace , heres the fact, you say something is unconstitutional, I say bullshit and here is why "Bullshit , if it contradicts the constitution you your self can literally take this to court yourself and argue your made up point. Which is totally bullshit , the court defines the constitution not some red neck out in bozo land. " Try to argue that hot rod. POST 94 total nonsense.
Rednecks aren't allowed to define the meaning of the constitution, The court does that ,what it means is what they say it means ace. Every redneck I've ever talked to have their own definition of every law in this country and every amendment of the constitution, 90% so stupid and wrong that you can't stop ROTFLthe court defines the constitution
No expert says they define it, they say the court interprets it based on what our genius Founders wrote.
To say they define it sounds like they give it its meaning and not its authors. Liberals often make this mistake. They will usually lack the IQ to understand the principle of limited govt so assume it does not exist.
For someone who likes to throw out the term "redneck" you sure do post like one. It's like reading the posts of an angry, uneducated child.Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.
Medicare , here you go again , all you cowboys are the same , there is no socialism or communism in this country , the only way you comedians can make it so, is if you define what socialism and communism is yourself , right back to the same old bullshit, The make believe world of the hate group they call a party. just one problem it already has a definition and that definition shows how stupid your definition is.there was a such thing as socialism in this country
what do you call medicare ????????
Actually, it's been a fascinating glimpse into your substandard education.It's been a slice , to much wasted bandwidth.
Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .The problem with Medicare for all, is that Medicare does not pay the full cost of health care.
The irony of Medicare for All is that gullible progressives think it will remove insurance company profits from the equation. Medicare does the opposite. A lot of people mistakenly think of Medicare as government run insurance. It's not. Medicare farms out insurance to the same companies that you're dealing with now. The only difference between Medicare and private insurance is that the government pays for it, rather than your employer.
That was not quite English.
Reality is, Medicare operates through insurance companies. Insurance companies get paid a fairly decent profit, to process medicare claims.
In fact, we have insurance companies here in Ohio, that ONLY process medicare claims, because essentially you get to make a good profit from just pushing papers around.
In 2011 or so, I remember a fuss over an insurance company, I believe in New York that wanted to increase premiums more than in years. This was a political cry, because Obama care falsely promised to reduce health insurance premiums (a ridiculous claim at face value. when has government actually reduced the cost of anything? Only moron would believe that).
The company was pointing out they were losing money on insurance policies because of Obama Care requirements.
The left-wingers pointed out they posted higher than ever profits.
The problem was, the company was losing money on their private insurance polices that they actually had to pay for.
The higher profits were from the increased load of expanded Medicaid and Medicare.
Medicare will make the super wealthy insurance companies, even more wealthy and filthy rich, for two reasons. One, they don't have to compete. Competition in the market forces down profits, because there is always someone who will offer a lower price to the public, for a smaller profit margin.
With Medicare and Medicaid, there is no competition.
Second, the company doesn't have to pay for care. They just collect the profits from processing Medicare and Medicaid claims. They are not putting out a penny for health care themselves. They just stamp the paperwork, and file it with government.
Rednecks aren't allowed to define the meaning of the constitution, The court does that ,what it means is what they say it means ace. Every redneck I've ever talked to have their own definition of every law in this country and every amendment of the constitution, 90% so stupid and wrong that you can't stop ROTFLthe court defines the constitution
No expert says they define it, they say the court interprets it based on what our genius Founders wrote.
To say they define it sounds like they give it its meaning and not its authors. Liberals often make this mistake. They will usually lack the IQ to understand the principle of limited govt so assume it does not exist.
Response to what, I told you straight out that I didn't read your comment. Your a hoot.Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .The problem with Medicare for all, is that Medicare does not pay the full cost of health care.
The irony of Medicare for All is that gullible progressives think it will remove insurance company profits from the equation. Medicare does the opposite. A lot of people mistakenly think of Medicare as government run insurance. It's not. Medicare farms out insurance to the same companies that you're dealing with now. The only difference between Medicare and private insurance is that the government pays for it, rather than your employer.
That was not quite English.
Reality is, Medicare operates through insurance companies. Insurance companies get paid a fairly decent profit, to process medicare claims.
In fact, we have insurance companies here in Ohio, that ONLY process medicare claims, because essentially you get to make a good profit from just pushing papers around.
In 2011 or so, I remember a fuss over an insurance company, I believe in New York that wanted to increase premiums more than in years. This was a political cry, because Obama care falsely promised to reduce health insurance premiums (a ridiculous claim at face value. when has government actually reduced the cost of anything? Only moron would believe that).
The company was pointing out they were losing money on insurance policies because of Obama Care requirements.
The left-wingers pointed out they posted higher than ever profits.
The problem was, the company was losing money on their private insurance polices that they actually had to pay for.
The higher profits were from the increased load of expanded Medicaid and Medicare.
Medicare will make the super wealthy insurance companies, even more wealthy and filthy rich, for two reasons. One, they don't have to compete. Competition in the market forces down profits, because there is always someone who will offer a lower price to the public, for a smaller profit margin.
With Medicare and Medicaid, there is no competition.
Second, the company doesn't have to pay for care. They just collect the profits from processing Medicare and Medicaid claims. They are not putting out a penny for health care themselves. They just stamp the paperwork, and file it with government.
So, you have no rational response? Ok.
Actually, it's been a fascinating glimpse into your substandard education.It's been a slice , to much wasted bandwidth.
It's rather obvious why you've been so brainwashed by the left: not much to wash.
Public schools?
Response to what, I told you straight out that I didn't read your comment. Your a hoot.Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .The problem with Medicare for all, is that Medicare does not pay the full cost of health care.
The irony of Medicare for All is that gullible progressives think it will remove insurance company profits from the equation. Medicare does the opposite. A lot of people mistakenly think of Medicare as government run insurance. It's not. Medicare farms out insurance to the same companies that you're dealing with now. The only difference between Medicare and private insurance is that the government pays for it, rather than your employer.
That was not quite English.
Reality is, Medicare operates through insurance companies. Insurance companies get paid a fairly decent profit, to process medicare claims.
In fact, we have insurance companies here in Ohio, that ONLY process medicare claims, because essentially you get to make a good profit from just pushing papers around.
In 2011 or so, I remember a fuss over an insurance company, I believe in New York that wanted to increase premiums more than in years. This was a political cry, because Obama care falsely promised to reduce health insurance premiums (a ridiculous claim at face value. when has government actually reduced the cost of anything? Only moron would believe that).
The company was pointing out they were losing money on insurance policies because of Obama Care requirements.
The left-wingers pointed out they posted higher than ever profits.
The problem was, the company was losing money on their private insurance polices that they actually had to pay for.
The higher profits were from the increased load of expanded Medicaid and Medicare.
Medicare will make the super wealthy insurance companies, even more wealthy and filthy rich, for two reasons. One, they don't have to compete. Competition in the market forces down profits, because there is always someone who will offer a lower price to the public, for a smaller profit margin.
With Medicare and Medicaid, there is no competition.
Second, the company doesn't have to pay for care. They just collect the profits from processing Medicare and Medicaid claims. They are not putting out a penny for health care themselves. They just stamp the paperwork, and file it with government.
So, you have no rational response? Ok.
I told you red necks aren't allowed to define the meaning of the constitution. The court does that and does a great job. You people have no clue what it means, just blubber on, each and everyone of you haters have your own Bozo interpretation of the constitution. Always half witted and self righteous.Rednecks aren't allowed to define the meaning of the constitution, The court does that ,what it means is what they say it means ace. Every redneck I've ever talked to have their own definition of every law in this country and every amendment of the constitution, 90% so stupid and wrong that you can't stop ROTFLthe court defines the constitution
No expert says they define it, they say the court interprets it based on what our genius Founders wrote.
To say they define it sounds like they give it its meaning and not its authors. Liberals often make this mistake. They will usually lack the IQ to understand the principle of limited govt so assume it does not exist.
The court isn't allowed to define the meaning of the constitution either. The people who wrote it, are. And we have their letters and documents stating what it means.
You don't get to just re-define what other people's words mean.
Ok it is your time now it has been a slice.Actually, it's been a fascinating glimpse into your substandard education.It's been a slice , to much wasted bandwidth.
It's rather obvious why you've been so brainwashed by the left: not much to wash.
Public schools?
Agreed. A few errors here and there, fine. Typos happen. But when you just flat out say stuff that isn't even complete sentences on a routine basis.... yeah.... Time to go back to writing class.
Reading it makes everyone ignorant. you sell bullshit nothing else. It's been a sliceResponse to what, I told you straight out that I didn't read your comment. Your a hoot.Try using your brain, take your shit someplace else if my comments aren't up to your standard. It stupid complaining about it, just find someplace else to play , it's called logic. Didn't read you comment. just the redneck beginning.This is crap just like everything from these mental generous's .The problem with Medicare for all, is that Medicare does not pay the full cost of health care.
The irony of Medicare for All is that gullible progressives think it will remove insurance company profits from the equation. Medicare does the opposite. A lot of people mistakenly think of Medicare as government run insurance. It's not. Medicare farms out insurance to the same companies that you're dealing with now. The only difference between Medicare and private insurance is that the government pays for it, rather than your employer.
That was not quite English.
Reality is, Medicare operates through insurance companies. Insurance companies get paid a fairly decent profit, to process medicare claims.
In fact, we have insurance companies here in Ohio, that ONLY process medicare claims, because essentially you get to make a good profit from just pushing papers around.
In 2011 or so, I remember a fuss over an insurance company, I believe in New York that wanted to increase premiums more than in years. This was a political cry, because Obama care falsely promised to reduce health insurance premiums (a ridiculous claim at face value. when has government actually reduced the cost of anything? Only moron would believe that).
The company was pointing out they were losing money on insurance policies because of Obama Care requirements.
The left-wingers pointed out they posted higher than ever profits.
The problem was, the company was losing money on their private insurance polices that they actually had to pay for.
The higher profits were from the increased load of expanded Medicaid and Medicare.
Medicare will make the super wealthy insurance companies, even more wealthy and filthy rich, for two reasons. One, they don't have to compete. Competition in the market forces down profits, because there is always someone who will offer a lower price to the public, for a smaller profit margin.
With Medicare and Medicaid, there is no competition.
Second, the company doesn't have to pay for care. They just collect the profits from processing Medicare and Medicaid claims. They are not putting out a penny for health care themselves. They just stamp the paperwork, and file it with government.
So, you have no rational response? Ok.
So you have no rational response. Got it. Saying you didn't read it, just makes you ignorant. You are proudly proclaiming your ignorance, and acting like I should care.
