That didn't take long, enviros suing Trump over repeal of climate endangerment finding

[Anomalism]

So we are really to believe that when Melissa came ashore, there really were 150+ mph sustained winds, except they did not knock down the vast majority of trees, just the oppositek, and wooden shacks were still standing after being hit by those winds...


not a sane answer

Wind instruments and pressure readings determine the category. Trees and shacks survive in spots due to local terrain, gust timing, and building resilience. Damage patterns aren’t a direct measure of sustained wind speed.

 

[EMH]

Wind instruments and pressure readings determine the category. Trees and shacks survive in spots due to local terrain, gust timing, and building resilience. Damage patterns aren’t a direct measure of sustained wind speed.

There is NO PART of Jamaica that shows more than Cat 1 damage.

 

[Anomalism]

There is NO PART of Jamaica that shows more than Cat 1 damage.

That doesn’t change the measured sustained winds. Hurricanes are categorized by wind speed and central pressure, not by uniform destruction on every patch of land. Local variability doesn’t invalidate the meteorological data.

 

[kevinthrowe]

No breakout at all in actual hurricane data...

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

I love to go to the library.
Pick a topic.
Climate change, spirituality, renewable energy, Bible studies, glaciers.
Take out 6 books read, get 6 more read when the shelves have been read one gets a knowledge of the topic and a clear view of the science.
C12 plus heat equal 12- CO2

 

[EMH]

I love to go to the library.
Pick a topic.
Climate change, spirituality, renewable energy, Bible studies, glaciers.
Take out 6 books read, get 6 more read when the shelves have been read one gets a knowledge of the topic and a clear view of the science.
C12 plus heat equal 12- CO2

The actual Earth climate data


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEAN
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE

 

[kevinthrowe]

The actual Earth climate data


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEAN
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE

Go read some footnoted books
The book on the whaleboats sailors notes is a great one.
As is the book on from the English family estate of daily events in nature since 1580

 

[EMH]

Go read some footnoted books
The book on the whaleboats sailors notes is a great one.
As is the book on from the English family estate of daily events in nature since 1580

as soon as you produce a "photo" documenting "ocean rise"

 

[Anomalism]

as soon as you produce a "photo" documenting "ocean rise"

We decided a long time ago that eye balling it isn't accurate in science.

 

[EMH]

We decided a long time ago that eye balling it isn't accurate in science.

I "see," the ocean rise is really there except it is INVISIBLE.... got it...

 

[Anomalism]

I "see," the ocean rise is really there except it is INVISIBLE.... got it...

Eyeballing it isn't how science works bud. You're embarrassing yourself right now.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Here is an excellent explanation of how these idiotic regulations came to be in the first place

 

[EMH]

Eyeballing it isn't how science works bud. You're embarrassing yourself right now.

Then SHOW US some "visible" "ocean rise."

 

[kevinthrowe]

as soon as you produce a "photo" documenting "ocean rise"

Why are so many afraid to acquire new knowledge?
Even a simple google search show climate change is an accepted reality by a vast majority of scientists.
Reading is fundamental

 

[Anomalism]

Then SHOW US some "visible" "ocean rise."

I have explained to you more than once why a photograph can't prove or disprove anything.

Your understanding of science is so infantile that it's hard to take you seriously.

 

[Anomalism]

Here is an excellent explanation of how these idiotic regulations came to be in the first place

So what's your position, exactly? Just curious. Is AGW a hoax?

 

[kevinthrowe]

I have explained to you more than once why a photograph can't prove or disprove anything.

Your understanding of science is so infantile that it's hard to take you seriously.

Those Islands in the pacific show it

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

So what's your position, exactly? Just curious. Is AGW a hoax?

In the sense the political left frames it?

Yes

 

[Anomalism]

In the sense the political left frames it?

Yes

Okay. In what sense is it not a hoax? Or are you just going to dance around saying what you actually think?

 

[jc456]

LOL Well if you like more lead and mercury in your food and atmosphere, Trump is your buddy. But fools like you will probably insist that it does no harm. Ah well, fools and idiots we will always have with us, until they win a Darwin Award.

Where’s that lead and mercury?

 

[jc456]

Okay. In what sense is it not a hoax? Or are you just going to dance around saying what you actually think?

What is it, describe it?